S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:CSOD

Cornerstone OnDemand Competitors

$50.52
-1.09 (-2.11 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$50.19
Now: $50.52
$51.87
50-Day Range
$40.90
MA: $45.51
$55.18
52-Week Range
$22.22
Now: $50.52
$55.50
Volume457,411 shs
Average Volume452,655 shs
Market Capitalization$3.29 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.37

Competitors

Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) Vs. FB, SE, TWTR, EQIX, EBAY, and CSGP

Should you be buying CSOD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "internet software & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Cornerstone OnDemand, including Facebook (FB), SEA (SE), Twitter (TWTR), Equinix (EQIX), eBay (EBAY), and CoStar Group (CSGP).

Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Facebook and Cornerstone OnDemand's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facebook$70.70 billion10.38$18.49 billion$6.4340.07
Cornerstone OnDemand$576.52 million5.70$-4,050,000.00$1.1743.18

Facebook has higher revenue and earnings than Cornerstone OnDemand. Facebook is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cornerstone OnDemand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Facebook and Cornerstone OnDemand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Facebook32.00%23.27%18.12%
Cornerstone OnDemand-4.70%51.19%6.97%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

65.0% of Facebook shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Facebook shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Facebook and Cornerstone OnDemand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Facebook143712.88
Cornerstone OnDemand13402.38

Facebook presently has a consensus target price of $324.65, suggesting a potential upside of 26.02%. Cornerstone OnDemand has a consensus target price of $55.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Facebook's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Facebook is more favorable than Cornerstone OnDemand.

Volatility and Risk

Facebook has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cornerstone OnDemand has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Facebook beats Cornerstone OnDemand on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

SEA (NYSE:SE) and Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SEA and Cornerstone OnDemand's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SEA$2.18 billion35.43$-1,462,800,000.00($2.27)-103.83
Cornerstone OnDemand$576.52 million5.70$-4,050,000.00$1.1743.18

Cornerstone OnDemand has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SEA. SEA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cornerstone OnDemand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SEA and Cornerstone OnDemand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SEA-38.59%-144.79%-22.93%
Cornerstone OnDemand-4.70%51.19%6.97%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

74.4% of SEA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of SEA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for SEA and Cornerstone OnDemand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SEA12702.60
Cornerstone OnDemand13402.38

SEA presently has a consensus target price of $190.1818, suggesting a potential downside of 19.31%. Cornerstone OnDemand has a consensus target price of $55.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Cornerstone OnDemand's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cornerstone OnDemand is more favorable than SEA.

Volatility and Risk

SEA has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cornerstone OnDemand has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cornerstone OnDemand beats SEA on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Twitter and Cornerstone OnDemand's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twitter$3.46 billion17.78$1.47 billion$1.9938.72
Cornerstone OnDemand$576.52 million5.70$-4,050,000.00$1.1743.18

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Cornerstone OnDemand. Twitter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cornerstone OnDemand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Twitter and Cornerstone OnDemand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Twitter-31.70%-12.42%-7.89%
Cornerstone OnDemand-4.70%51.19%6.97%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

73.2% of Twitter shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Twitter shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Twitter and Cornerstone OnDemand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Twitter1221402.35
Cornerstone OnDemand13402.38

Twitter presently has a consensus target price of $59.9079, suggesting a potential downside of 22.26%. Cornerstone OnDemand has a consensus target price of $55.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Cornerstone OnDemand's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cornerstone OnDemand is more favorable than Twitter.

Volatility and Risk

Twitter has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cornerstone OnDemand has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cornerstone OnDemand beats Twitter on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Equinix (NASDAQ:EQIX) and Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Equinix and Cornerstone OnDemand's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Equinix$5.56 billion10.41$507.45 million$22.8128.42
Cornerstone OnDemand$576.52 million5.70$-4,050,000.00$1.1743.18

Equinix has higher revenue and earnings than Cornerstone OnDemand. Equinix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cornerstone OnDemand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Equinix and Cornerstone OnDemand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Equinix7.58%4.62%1.74%
Cornerstone OnDemand-4.70%51.19%6.97%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.4% of Equinix shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Equinix shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Equinix and Cornerstone OnDemand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Equinix021712.95
Cornerstone OnDemand13402.38

Equinix presently has a consensus target price of $821.8947, suggesting a potential upside of 26.77%. Cornerstone OnDemand has a consensus target price of $55.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. Given Equinix's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Equinix is more favorable than Cornerstone OnDemand.

Volatility and Risk

Equinix has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cornerstone OnDemand has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Equinix beats Cornerstone OnDemand on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.1% of eBay shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of eBay shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares eBay and Cornerstone OnDemand's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eBay$10.80 billion3.55$1.79 billion$2.3224.32
Cornerstone OnDemand$576.52 million5.70$-4,050,000.00$1.1743.18

eBay has higher revenue and earnings than Cornerstone OnDemand. eBay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cornerstone OnDemand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for eBay and Cornerstone OnDemand, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eBay0131202.48
Cornerstone OnDemand13402.38

eBay presently has a consensus target price of $67.20, suggesting a potential upside of 19.11%. Cornerstone OnDemand has a consensus target price of $55.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. Given eBay's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe eBay is more favorable than Cornerstone OnDemand.

Profitability

This table compares eBay and Cornerstone OnDemand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eBay50.42%82.73%11.84%
Cornerstone OnDemand-4.70%51.19%6.97%

Volatility and Risk

eBay has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cornerstone OnDemand has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

eBay beats Cornerstone OnDemand on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cornerstone OnDemand (NASDAQ:CSOD) and CoStar Group (NASDAQ:CSGP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.9% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of CoStar Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Cornerstone OnDemand shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of CoStar Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cornerstone OnDemand and CoStar Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cornerstone OnDemand$576.52 million5.70$-4,050,000.00$1.1743.18
CoStar Group$1.40 billion23.20$314.96 million$9.1290.32

CoStar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cornerstone OnDemand. Cornerstone OnDemand is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoStar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Cornerstone OnDemand and CoStar Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cornerstone OnDemand13402.38
CoStar Group00903.00

Cornerstone OnDemand presently has a consensus target price of $55.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 10.19%. CoStar Group has a consensus target price of $920.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.68%. Given CoStar Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CoStar Group is more favorable than Cornerstone OnDemand.

Profitability

This table compares Cornerstone OnDemand and CoStar Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cornerstone OnDemand-4.70%51.19%6.97%
CoStar Group17.57%7.58%6.05%

Volatility and Risk

Cornerstone OnDemand has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CoStar Group has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

CoStar Group beats Cornerstone OnDemand on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Cornerstone OnDemand Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Facebook logo
FB
Facebook
2.3$257.62-1.1%$733.62 billion$70.70 billion29.34Insider Selling
News Coverage
SEA logo
SE
SEA
1.2$235.69-0.1%$77.08 billion$2.18 billion-80.17Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Twitter logo
TWTR
Twitter
1.3$77.06-3.2%$61.51 billion$3.46 billion-55.84Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Equinix logo
EQIX
Equinix
2.6$648.34-1.5%$57.89 billion$5.56 billion127.13Ex-Dividend
Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
eBay logo
EBAY
eBay
2.2$56.42-0.7%$38.39 billion$10.80 billion7.85
CoStar Group logo
CSGP
CoStar Group
1.8$823.76-0.5%$32.47 billion$1.40 billion110.57Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
VeriSign logo
VRSN
VeriSign
1.7$194.03-1.9%$21.94 billion$1.23 billion28.79
Akamai Technologies logo
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
1.9$94.50-1.0%$15.38 billion$2.89 billion27.71Analyst Revision
ANGI Homeservices logo
ANGI
ANGI Homeservices
0.8$14.95-0.6%$7.47 billion$1.33 billion1,496.00Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
J2 Global logo
JCOM
J2 Global
1.5$111.38-1.6%$5.08 billion$1.37 billion25.14Analyst Report
LivePerson logo
LPSN
LivePerson
1.4$65.62-11.4%$4.39 billion$291.61 million-35.28Analyst Report
Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
SPS Commerce logo
SPSC
SPS Commerce
1.5$100.73-3.5%$3.58 billion$279.12 million89.14Insider Selling
Gap Down
Envestnet logo
ENV
Envestnet
1.6$64.02-25.0%$3.45 billion$900.13 million-492.46Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.6$181.93-1.3%$3.32 billion$571.85 million22.54Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Yelp logo
YELP
Yelp
1.4$37.71-1.6%$2.79 billion$1.01 billion-221.81Decrease in Short Interest
Cimpress logo
CMPR
Cimpress
1.6$99.08-3.5%$2.58 billion$2.48 billion65.18Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.5$83.63-2.5%$2.35 billion$133.96 million132.75Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$34.71-0.5%$2.33 billion$354.20 million38.57
Perficient logo
PRFT
Perficient
1.5$55.69-0.8%$1.84 billion$565.53 million54.60Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
Opendoor Technologies logo
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies
1.6$28.02-2.4%$1.45 billionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
1.6$23.89-2.6%$1.27 billion$490.34 million40.49Gap Up
Brightcove logo
BCOV
Brightcove
1.6$21.78-0.1%$866.98 million$184.46 million-58.86
Blucora logo
BCOR
Blucora
1.9$16.20-5.2%$778.31 million$717.95 million-2.81News Coverage
Gap Down
Liquidity Services logo
LQDT
Liquidity Services
1.4$15.61-1.2%$545.15 million$205.94 million-141.91Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
ZIX logo
ZIXI
ZIX
1.9$7.38-25.5%$420.59 million$173.43 million-23.81High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.27-2.1%$405.92 million$200.63 million-54.50
RealNetworks logo
RNWK
RealNetworks
0.8$4.37-1.1%$167.27 million$172.11 million-8.74
DHI Group logo
DHX
DHI Group
2.0$3.11-0.0%$162.47 million$149.37 million-5.27
Travelzoo logo
TZOO
Travelzoo
1.1$13.52-1.2%$152.91 million$111.41 million-10.40Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Marchex logo
MCHX
Marchex
1.7$3.00-4.0%$118.71 million$106.13 million-4.23Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Down
Synacor logo
SYNC
Synacor
0.7$2.13-0.9%$84.44 million$121.85 million-7.10Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Support.com logo
SPRT
Support.com
0.4$2.14-4.2%$41.47 million$63.33 million71.36Gap Down
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.