Safe & Green (SGBX) Competitors

Singing Machine (NASDAQ:MICS) and Safe & Green (NASDAQ:SGBX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, community ranking, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Do analysts rate MICS or SGBX?

Singing Machine presently has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 351.21%. Given Safe & Green's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Singing Machine is more favorable than Safe & Green.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Singing Machine	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Safe & Green	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Does the MarketBeat Community believe in MICS or SGBX?

Safe & Green received 1 more outperform votes than Singing Machine when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 66.67% of users gave Safe & Green an outperform vote while only 50.00% of users gave Singing Machine an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Singing Machine	Outperform Votes 1 50.00%	Underperform Votes 1 50.00%
Safe & Green	Outperform Votes 2 66.67%	Underperform Votes 1 33.33%

Which has more risk and volatility, MICS or SGBX?

Singing Machine has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Safe & Green has a beta of -2.6, indicating that its stock price is 360% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the media favor MICS or SGBX?

In the previous week, Safe & Green had 1 more articles in the media than Singing Machine. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Safe & Green and 5 mentions for Singing Machine. Safe & Green's average media sentiment score of 0.09 beat Singing Machine's score of 0.06 indicating that Singing Machine is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Singing Machine	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Safe & Green	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MICS or SGBX?

Safe & Green has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Singing Machine. Singing Machine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe & Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Singing Machine	$39.30M	0.10	-$4.64M	-$2.28	-0.39
Safe & Green	$24.40M	0.19	-$4.20M	-$1.08	-0.23

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MICS or SGBX?

3.5% of Safe & Green shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.5% of Singing Machine shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Safe & Green shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Is MICS or SGBX more profitable?

Singing Machine has a net margin of -25.06% compared to Singing Machine's net margin of -85.63%. Safe & Green's return on equity of -66.86% beat Singing Machine's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Singing Machine	-25.06%	-66.86%	-32.33%
Safe & Green	-85.63%	-150.41%	-59.09%

Summary

Singing Machine beats Safe & Green on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.