AEVA vs. MAPS, HBIO, GOEV, MASS, INVZ, CVGI, MPAA, STRT, CPS, and XOS
Should you be buying Aeva Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Aeva Technologies include WM Technology (MAPS), Harvard Bioscience (HBIO), Canoo (GOEV), 908 Devices (MASS), Innoviz Technologies (INVZ), Commercial Vehicle Group (CVGI), Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA), Strattec Security (STRT), Cooper-Standard (CPS), and XOS (XOS).
WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) and Aeva Technologies (NYSE:AEVA) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.
22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.9% of Aeva Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 41.3% of WM Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Aeva Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Aeva Technologies has a consensus price target of $11.90, indicating a potential upside of 284.49%. Given WM Technology's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aeva Technologies is more favorable than WM Technology.
WM Technology has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aeva Technologies has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Aeva Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Aeva Technologies and 1 mentions for WM Technology. Aeva Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat WM Technology's score of 0.97 indicating that WM Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Aeva Technologies received 3 more outperform votes than WM Technology when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 51.35% of users gave WM Technology an outperform vote while only 48.89% of users gave Aeva Technologies an outperform vote.
WM Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Aeva Technologies. Aeva Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WM Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
WM Technology has a net margin of -56.88% compared to WM Technology's net margin of -3,463.20%. Aeva Technologies' return on equity of -25.02% beat WM Technology's return on equity.
Summary
WM Technology beats Aeva Technologies on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Aeva Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AEVA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AEVA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartThis chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Aeva Technologies Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools