California Resources Competitors

DXI Capital (OTCMKTS:DXIEF) and California Resources (OTCMKTS:CRCQQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

35.7% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of California Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares DXI Capital and California Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares DXI Capital and California Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

DXI Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than California Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for DXI Capital and California Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

California Resources beats DXI Capital on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) and California Resources (OTCMKTS:CRCQQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for ECA Marcellus Trust I and California Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and California Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and California Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than California Resources.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.7% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats California Resources on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Coast Oil Trust (OTCMKTS:ROYTL) and California Resources (OTCMKTS:CRCQQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Coast Oil Trust and California Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Coast Oil Trust and California Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pacific Coast Oil Trust and California Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pacific Coast Oil Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than California Resources.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.1% of Pacific Coast Oil Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.7% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pacific Coast Oil Trust beats California Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Whiting USA Trust II (OTCMKTS:WHZT) and California Resources (OTCMKTS:CRCQQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Whiting USA Trust II and California Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Whiting USA Trust II and California Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Whiting USA Trust II has higher earnings, but lower revenue than California Resources.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Whiting USA Trust II and California Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

35.7% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of California Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Whiting USA Trust II beats California Resources on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

HKN (OTCMKTS:HKNI) and California Resources (OTCMKTS:CRCQQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for HKN and California Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares HKN and California Resources' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

HKN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than California Resources.

Profitability

This table compares HKN and California Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

35.7% of California Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of HKN shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of California Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

California Resources (OTCMKTS:CRCQQ) and Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares California Resources and Groove Botanicals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for California Resources and Groove Botanicals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.7% of California Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of California Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.1% of Groove Botanicals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares California Resources and Groove Botanicals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Groove Botanicals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than California Resources.

Summary

Groove Botanicals beats California Resources on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.