H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:HNNMY) and CyberAgent (OTCMKTS:CYAGF) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.
Earnings and Valuation
This table compares H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) and CyberAgent's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio |
---|
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) | $24.63 billion | 1.42 | $1.43 billion | $0.17 | 28.18 |
CyberAgent | $4.44 billion | 2.05 | $61.46 million | N/A | N/A |
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has higher revenue and earnings than CyberAgent.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) and CyberAgent, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score |
---|
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) | 3 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2.14 |
CyberAgent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 |
Profitability
This table compares H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) and CyberAgent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets |
---|
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) | 1.62% | 5.72% | 1.87% |
CyberAgent | 1.37% | 10.78% | 5.36% |
Institutional and Insider Ownership
0.0% of H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Risk & Volatility
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CyberAgent has a beta of -0.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) beats CyberAgent on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.