OTCMKTS:ECT

ECA Marcellus Trust I Competitors

$0.40
-0.01 (-2.86 %)
(As of 07/30/2020)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.38
Now: $0.40
$0.41
50-Day Range
$0.40
MA: $0.40
$0.40
52-Week Range
$0.26
Now: $0.40
$1.72
Volume22,400 shs
Average Volume66,792 shs
Market Capitalization$7.05 million
P/E Ratio5.00
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2

Competitors

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) Vs. VYEY, GBR, CKX, AXAS, PGHEF, and PERS

Should you be buying ECT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to ECA Marcellus Trust I, including Victory Oilfield Tech (VYEY), New Concept Energy (GBR), CKX Lands (CKX), Abraxas Petroleum (AXAS), Pengrowth Energy (PGHEF), and SandRidge Permian Trust (PERS).

Victory Oilfield Tech (OTCMKTS:VYEY) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. 97.6% of Victory Oilfield Tech shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Victory Oilfield Tech and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Victory Oilfield TechN/AN/AN/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I46.53%4.37%4.32%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Victory Oilfield Tech and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Victory Oilfield Tech0000N/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I0000N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Victory Oilfield Tech and ECA Marcellus Trust I's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victory Oilfield Tech$1.03 million26.95$-27,310,000.00N/AN/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I$4.15 million1.70$2.90 millionN/AN/A

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher revenue and earnings than Victory Oilfield Tech.

Volatility and Risk

Victory Oilfield Tech has a beta of 2.56, indicating that its share price is 156% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Victory Oilfield Tech on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) and New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and New Concept Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ECA Marcellus Trust I46.53%4.37%4.32%
New Concept Energy533.42%-6.01%-3.15%

Volatility and Risk

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, suggesting that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for ECA Marcellus Trust I and New Concept Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ECA Marcellus Trust I0000N/A
New Concept Energy0000N/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and New Concept Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECA Marcellus Trust I$4.15 million1.70$2.90 millionN/AN/A
New Concept Energy$590,000.0045.06$-2,350,000.00N/AN/A

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher revenue and earnings than New Concept Energy.

CKX Lands (NYSEAMERICAN:CKX) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares CKX Lands and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CKX Lands51.55%2.45%2.38%
ECA Marcellus Trust I46.53%4.37%4.32%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CKX Lands and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CKX Lands0000N/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I0000N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

4.9% of CKX Lands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of CKX Lands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CKX Lands and ECA Marcellus Trust I's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CKX Lands$810,000.0031.52$250,000.00N/AN/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I$4.15 million1.70$2.90 millionN/AN/A

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher revenue and earnings than CKX Lands.

Volatility and Risk

CKX Lands has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, suggesting that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Abraxas Petroleum (NASDAQ:AXAS) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Abraxas Petroleum and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Abraxas Petroleum0000N/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I0000N/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Abraxas Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Abraxas Petroleum and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Abraxas Petroleum-313.53%-61.90%-15.09%
ECA Marcellus Trust I46.53%4.37%4.32%

Volatility and Risk

Abraxas Petroleum has a beta of 3.53, meaning that its share price is 253% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, meaning that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Abraxas Petroleum and ECA Marcellus Trust I's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Abraxas Petroleum$129.15 million0.19$-65,000,000.00N/AN/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I$4.15 million1.70$2.90 millionN/AN/A

ECA Marcellus Trust I has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Abraxas Petroleum.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Abraxas Petroleum on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pengrowth Energy (OTCMKTS:PGHEF) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and ECA Marcellus Trust I's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pengrowth Energy$408.45 million0.06$-431,500,000.00N/AN/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I$4.15 million1.70$2.90 millionN/AN/A

ECA Marcellus Trust I has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pengrowth Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Pengrowth Energy and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pengrowth Energy-147.21%-193.94%-25.06%
ECA Marcellus Trust I46.53%4.37%4.32%

Volatility and Risk

Pengrowth Energy has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, indicating that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.5% of Pengrowth Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Pengrowth Energy and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pengrowth Energy0000N/A
ECA Marcellus Trust I0000N/A

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Pengrowth Energy on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) and SandRidge Permian Trust (OTCMKTS:PERS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of SandRidge Permian Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.0% of SandRidge Permian Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, suggesting that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SandRidge Permian Trust has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and SandRidge Permian Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ECA Marcellus Trust I46.53%4.37%4.32%
SandRidge Permian Trust71.65%19.68%19.68%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for ECA Marcellus Trust I and SandRidge Permian Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ECA Marcellus Trust I0000N/A
SandRidge Permian Trust0000N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and SandRidge Permian Trust's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECA Marcellus Trust I$4.15 million1.70$2.90 millionN/AN/A
SandRidge Permian Trust$22.44 million1.08$17.29 millionN/AN/A

SandRidge Permian Trust has higher revenue and earnings than ECA Marcellus Trust I.

Summary

SandRidge Permian Trust beats ECA Marcellus Trust I on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


ECA Marcellus Trust I Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Victory Oilfield Tech logo
VYEY
Victory Oilfield Tech
0.8$0.99-4.0%$26.64 million$1.03 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Down
GBR
New Concept Energy
0.7$5.18-1.0%$26.58 million$590,000.0012.95
CKX
CKX Lands
0.5$13.16-5.0%$25.53 million$810,000.0065.80
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$2.97-1.7%$24.96 million$129.15 million0.00
Pengrowth Energy logo
PGHEF
Pengrowth Energy
0.6$0.04-0.0%$24.93 million$408.45 million0.00Gap Down
PERS
SandRidge Permian Trust
0.7$0.46-4.1%$23.15 million$22.44 million2.88Gap Down
BRN
Barnwell Industries
0.8$2.72-6.3%$22.97 million$18.35 million-4.77Gap Down
BDGR
Black Dragon Resource Companies
0.0$0.00-0.0%$22.94 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Camber Energy logo
CEI
Camber Energy
0.5$0.90-2.2%$22.50 million$400,000.000.00
HPST
Hempstract
0.0$0.28-7.2%$22.24 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
HENC
Hero Technologies
0.0$0.13-0.0%$20.51 millionN/A0.00
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$4.73-15.6%$20.36 million$452.66 million-0.02Gap Down
Gulfport Energy logo
GPORQ
Gulfport Energy
0.6$0.05-5.0%$19.77 million$1.35 billion0.00Gap Up
U.S. Energy logo
USEG
U.S. Energy
0.8$4.20-0.5%$19.64 million$6.57 million0.00
GSPE
GulfSlope Energy
0.6$0.01-0.0%$17.88 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
MXC
Mexco Energy
0.6$8.09-1.9%$16.76 million$2.74 million-53.93
Sow Good logo
ANFC
Sow Good
0.7$5.75-11.3%$15.78 million$470,000.000.00Gap Down
EPEGQ
EP Energy
0.5$0.06-0.0%$15.29 million$820 million-0.02
Houston American Energy logo
HUSA
Houston American Energy
0.5$1.82-1.6%$12.70 million$1 million0.00News Coverage
HKRSQ
Halcon Resources
0.6$0.07-2.0%$12.14 million$224.68 million0.00Gap Down
BXEFF
Bellatrix Exploration
0.4N/AN/A$11.64 million$148.67 million-0.01Gap Up
BXEFD
Bellatrix Exploration
0.4N/AN/A$11.64 million$176.47 million-0.02
Sundance Energy Australia logo
SDCJF
Sundance Energy Australia
0.6$0.15-66.7%$11.34 million$164.93 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Up
GrowMax Resources logo
APEOF
GrowMax Resources
0.9$0.05-0.0%$10.70 millionN/A5.01
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.2$0.05-0.0%$8.38 million$1.35 billion0.00News Coverage
XOGAQ
Extraction Oil & Gas
0.9$0.06-0.0%$8.30 million$906.64 million-0.01
XOGAQ
Extraction Oil & Gas
0.9$0.06-0.0%$8.30 million$906.64 million-0.01
RVDO
Riverdale Oil and Gas
0.0$0.28-7.2%$7.59 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
DWOG
Deep Well Oil & Gas
0.8$0.03-0.0%$6.92 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
SDTTU
SandRidge Mississippian Trust I
0.7$0.24-0.0%$6.72 million$6.39 million6.00
SDRMU
SandRidge Mississippian Trust II
0.7$0.13-2.2%$6.37 million$10.15 million1.83
Royale Energy logo
ROYL
Royale Energy
0.7$0.11-0.0%$6.07 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
CRBO
Carbon Energy
0.6$2.90-0.0%$6.02 million$116.63 million0.00
CRBOD
Carbon Energy
0.1$2.90-0.0%$6.02 million$116.63 million0.00
BDCO
Blue Dolphin Energy
0.8$0.45-0.0%$5.71 million$309.26 million0.00
DXIEF
DXI Capital
0.6$0.45-0.0%$5.40 million$950,000.000.00
ECTM
ECA Marcellus Trust I
0.7$0.30-1.7%$5.28 million$4.15 million7.38
ROYTL
Pacific Coast Oil Trust
0.0$0.13-1.0%$5.02 million$54.18 million0.00News Coverage
Gap Up
HKNI
HKN
0.0$6.04-0.0%$2.36 millionN/A0.00
WHZT
Whiting USA Trust II
0.9$0.13-0.0%$2.30 million$46.97 million0.57
UNTCQ
Unit
0.1$0.04-0.0%$2.21 million$674.63 million0.00
Sundance Energy logo
SNDE
Sundance Energy
1.3$0.31-0.0%$2.13 million$203.58 million-0.53News Coverage
Gap Down
RRRI
Rock Ridge Resources
0.0$0.02-0.0%$1.68 millionN/A0.00
PSJEY
Petsec Energy
0.0$0.02-0.0%$1.67 million$1.09 million0.00
CHAPQ
Chaparral Energy
0.2N/AN/A$1.67 million$236.35 million0.00Gap Down
ROSEQ
Rosehill Resources
0.5$0.04-0.0%$1.56 million$302.28 million-0.01
Groove Botanicals logo
GRVE
Groove Botanicals
0.2$0.05-0.0%$1.48 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
FECOF
FEC Resources
0.5$0.00-0.0%$1.47 millionN/A0.00
CRCQQ
California Resources
0.2$0.03-0.0%$1.39 million$2.63 billion0.00
LLEXQ
Lilis Energy
0.0$0.01-0.0%$1.31 million$66.06 million0.00
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.