Cushman & Wakefield (CWK) Competitors

Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE:CWK) and Latam Logistic Properties (NYSE:LPA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer CWK or LPA?

Cushman & Wakefield received 196 more outperform votes than Latam Logistic Properties when rated by MarketBeat users.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Cushman & Wakefield	Outperform Votes 196 67.59%	Underperform Votes 94 32.41%
Latam Logistic Properties	N/A	N/A

Does the media favor CWK or LPA?

In the previous week, Latam Logistic Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Cushman & Wakefield. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Latam Logistic Properties and 1 mentions for Cushman & Wakefield. Cushman & Wakefield's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Latam Logistic Properties' score of 0.52 indicating that Cushman & Wakefield is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cushman & Wakefield	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Latam Logistic Properties	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has more volatility and risk, CWK or LPA?

Cushman & Wakefield has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Latam Logistic Properties has a beta of 7.77, suggesting that its stock price is 677% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CWK or LPA?

95.6% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Latam Logistic Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cushman & Wakefield shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 32.0% of Latam Logistic Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Do analysts rate CWK or LPA?

Cushman & Wakefield currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.14%. Given Cushman & Wakefield's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cushman & Wakefield is more favorable than Latam Logistic Properties.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cushman & Wakefield	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
Latam Logistic Properties	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	N/A

Is CWK or LPA more profitable?

Cushman & Wakefield has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Latam Logistic Properties' net margin of 0.00%. Cushman & Wakefield's return on equity of 12.41% beat Latam Logistic Properties' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cushman & Wakefield	0.13%	12.41%	2.64%
Latam Logistic Properties	N/A	-2.67%	-1.05%

Which has better earnings & valuation, CWK or LPA?

Latam Logistic Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cushman & Wakefield.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cushman & Wakefield	$9.49B	0.25	-$35.40M	$0.04	256.38
Latam Logistic Properties	$40.67M	36.75	$3.14M	N/A	N/A

Summary

Cushman & Wakefield beats Latam Logistic Properties on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.