BAH vs. FCN, G, STX, OMC, J, CPAY, APTV, FDS, KSPI, and BR
Should you be buying Booz Allen Hamilton stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Booz Allen Hamilton include FTI Consulting (FCN), Genpact (G), Seagate Technology (STX), Omnicom Group (OMC), Jacobs Solutions (J), Corpay (CPAY), Aptiv (APTV), FactSet Research Systems (FDS), Joint Stock Company Kaspi.kz (KSPI), and Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR). These companies are all part of the "business services" sector.
FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, community ranking, analyst recommendations and earnings.
FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, FTI Consulting had 5 more articles in the media than Booz Allen Hamilton. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for FTI Consulting and 9 mentions for Booz Allen Hamilton. FTI Consulting's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Booz Allen Hamilton's score of 0.84 indicating that Booz Allen Hamilton is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Booz Allen Hamilton received 307 more outperform votes than FTI Consulting when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 65.01% of users gave Booz Allen Hamilton an outperform vote while only 54.37% of users gave FTI Consulting an outperform vote.
FTI Consulting presently has a consensus target price of $255.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.76%. Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus target price of $145.11, suggesting a potential downside of 3.64%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Booz Allen Hamilton.
FTI Consulting has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Booz Allen Hamilton. FTI Consulting is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Booz Allen Hamilton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
FTI Consulting has a net margin of 8.51% compared to FTI Consulting's net margin of 3.96%. FTI Consulting's return on equity of 65.31% beat Booz Allen Hamilton's return on equity.
99.4% of FTI Consulting shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of FTI Consulting shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
FTI Consulting and Booz Allen Hamilton tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Booz Allen Hamilton News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BAH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BAH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Booz Allen Hamilton Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
