BWMN vs. LMB, HCKT, WLDN, MTRX, CECO, PESI, III, SLNG, UGRO, and HURN
Should you be buying Bowman Consulting Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Bowman Consulting Group include Limbach (LMB), The Hackett Group (HCKT), Willdan Group (WLDN), Matrix Service (MTRX), CECO Environmental (CECO), Perma-Fix Environmental Services (PESI), Information Services Group (III), Stabilis Solutions (SLNG), urban-gro (UGRO), and Huron Consulting Group (HURN).
Limbach (NASDAQ:LMB) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, community ranking, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.
Limbach has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Limbach received 190 more outperform votes than Bowman Consulting Group when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 58.97% of users gave Bowman Consulting Group an outperform vote while only 55.76% of users gave Limbach an outperform vote.
Limbach presently has a consensus target price of $39.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.91%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $46.33, indicating a potential upside of 48.65%. Given Limbach's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Limbach.
Limbach has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Limbach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Limbach has a net margin of 4.93% compared to Limbach's net margin of -2.43%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 21.75% beat Limbach's return on equity.
55.9% of Limbach shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Limbach shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, Limbach had 6 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Limbach and 9 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Limbach's score of -0.04 indicating that Limbach is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Limbach beats Bowman Consulting Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Bowman Consulting Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BWMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BWMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
