MSCI vs. ICE, MCO, CME, IBKR, NDAQ, MKTX, AROW, UBER, FI, and RELX
Should you be buying MSCI stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of MSCI include Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), Moody's (MCO), CME Group (CME), Interactive Brokers Group (IBKR), Nasdaq (NDAQ), MarketAxess (MKTX), Arrow Financial (AROW), Uber Technologies (UBER), Fiserv (FI), and Relx (RELX).
MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) and Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE:ICE) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, community ranking, valuation and profitability.
MSCI pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Intercontinental Exchange pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. MSCI pays out 43.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Intercontinental Exchange is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Intercontinental Exchange has higher revenue and earnings than MSCI. Intercontinental Exchange is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
MSCI currently has a consensus price target of $570.53, indicating a potential upside of 16.04%. Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $148.29, indicating a potential upside of 10.83%. Given MSCI's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe MSCI is more favorable than Intercontinental Exchange.
90.0% of MSCI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Intercontinental Exchange shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of MSCI shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Intercontinental Exchange shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
MSCI has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Intercontinental Exchange received 292 more outperform votes than MSCI when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 72.63% of users gave Intercontinental Exchange an outperform vote while only 65.67% of users gave MSCI an outperform vote.
MSCI has a net margin of 44.55% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 24.24%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 12.76% beat MSCI's return on equity.
In the previous week, Intercontinental Exchange had 1 more articles in the media than MSCI. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Intercontinental Exchange and 10 mentions for MSCI. MSCI's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Intercontinental Exchange's score of 1.00 indicating that MSCI is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Intercontinental Exchange beats MSCI on 11 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get MSCI News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MSCI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MSCI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
