S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
Log in
NYSE:MSCI

MSCI Competitors

$414.52
+8.22 (+2.02 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$409.44
Now: $414.52
$420.58
50-Day Range
$393.34
MA: $423.19
$453.19
52-Week Range
$218.65
Now: $414.52
$455.81
Volume639,187 shs
Average Volume548,257 shs
Market Capitalization$34.23 billion
P/E Ratio61.96
Dividend Yield0.77%
Beta0.91

Competitors

MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) Vs. UBER, FIS, MELI, NTES, GPN, and ZG

Should you be buying MSCI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "business services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to MSCI, including Uber Technologies (UBER), Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), MercadoLibre (MELI), NetEase (NTES), Global Payments (GPN), and Zillow Group (ZG).

Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) and MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

70.6% of Uber Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of MSCI shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of Uber Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of MSCI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Uber Technologies and MSCI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Uber Technologies-53.12%-43.27%-17.01%
MSCI34.28%-226.94%15.60%

Volatility and Risk

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSCI has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Uber Technologies and MSCI, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Uber Technologies043002.88
MSCI03402.57

Uber Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $60.2105, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. MSCI has a consensus price target of $463.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given Uber Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Uber Technologies is more favorable than MSCI.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Uber Technologies and MSCI's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Uber Technologies$14.15 billion6.45$-8,506,000,000.00($6.81)-7.60
MSCI$1.56 billion21.97$563.65 million$6.4464.37

MSCI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Uber Technologies. Uber Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fidelity National Information Services (NYSE:FIS) and MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSCI has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fidelity National Information Services and MSCI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fidelity National Information Services-0.83%6.88%4.08%
MSCI34.28%-226.94%15.60%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.5% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of MSCI shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of MSCI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. MSCI pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MSCI pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fidelity National Information Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and MSCI has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Fidelity National Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fidelity National Information Services and MSCI's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fidelity National Information Services$10.33 billion8.30$298 million$5.6124.60
MSCI$1.56 billion21.97$563.65 million$6.4464.37

MSCI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Fidelity National Information Services and MSCI, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fidelity National Information Services061912.81
MSCI03402.57

Fidelity National Information Services presently has a consensus price target of $159.2692, indicating a potential upside of 15.41%. MSCI has a consensus price target of $463.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given Fidelity National Information Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Fidelity National Information Services is more favorable than MSCI.

MercadoLibre (NASDAQ:MELI) and MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

MercadoLibre has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSCI has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MercadoLibre and MSCI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MercadoLibre-0.12%-0.22%-0.08%
MSCI34.28%-226.94%15.60%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.6% of MercadoLibre shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of MSCI shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of MercadoLibre shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of MSCI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MercadoLibre and MSCI's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MercadoLibre$2.30 billion35.58$-172,000,000.00($1.68)-975.07
MSCI$1.56 billion21.97$563.65 million$6.4464.37

MSCI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MercadoLibre. MercadoLibre is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for MercadoLibre and MSCI, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MercadoLibre041302.76
MSCI03402.57

MercadoLibre presently has a consensus target price of $1,599.5882, indicating a potential downside of 2.35%. MSCI has a consensus target price of $463.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given MSCI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MSCI is more favorable than MercadoLibre.

Summary

MSCI beats MercadoLibre on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

NetEase (NASDAQ:NTES) and MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

NetEase has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSCI has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NetEase and MSCI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NetEase20.47%19.03%10.97%
MSCI34.28%-226.94%15.60%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.3% of MSCI shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.7% of NetEase shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of MSCI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

NetEase pays an annual dividend of $0.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. MSCI pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. NetEase pays out 26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MSCI pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MSCI has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. MSCI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares NetEase and MSCI's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NetEase$8.51 billion8.26$3.09 billion$2.9337.49
MSCI$1.56 billion21.97$563.65 million$6.4464.37

NetEase has higher revenue and earnings than MSCI. NetEase is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for NetEase and MSCI, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NetEase011102.92
MSCI03402.57

NetEase presently has a consensus target price of $103.7111, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. MSCI has a consensus target price of $463.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given MSCI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MSCI is more favorable than NetEase.

Summary

MSCI beats NetEase on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Global Payments (NYSE:GPN) and MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Global Payments has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSCI has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Global Payments and MSCI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Global Payments6.75%6.46%4.06%
MSCI34.28%-226.94%15.60%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.7% of Global Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of MSCI shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Global Payments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of MSCI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Global Payments pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. MSCI pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Global Payments pays out 13.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MSCI pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Payments has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and MSCI has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. MSCI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Global Payments and MSCI's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Payments$4.91 billion11.90$430.61 million$5.8633.79
MSCI$1.56 billion21.97$563.65 million$6.4464.37

MSCI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Payments. Global Payments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Global Payments and MSCI, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Global Payments042602.87
MSCI03402.57

Global Payments presently has a consensus target price of $209.5862, indicating a potential upside of 5.86%. MSCI has a consensus target price of $463.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given MSCI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MSCI is more favorable than Global Payments.

Summary

MSCI beats Global Payments on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zillow Group (NASDAQ:ZG) and MSCI (NYSE:MSCI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Zillow Group has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSCI has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Zillow Group and MSCI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Zillow Group-11.54%-9.76%-5.70%
MSCI34.28%-226.94%15.60%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

26.0% of Zillow Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of MSCI shares are held by institutional investors. 18.5% of Zillow Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of MSCI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Zillow Group and MSCI's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zillow Group$2.74 billion14.90$-305,360,000.00($1.48)-114.74
MSCI$1.56 billion21.97$563.65 million$6.4464.37

MSCI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Zillow Group. Zillow Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSCI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Zillow Group and MSCI, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Zillow Group241602.64
MSCI03402.57

Zillow Group presently has a consensus target price of $167.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.37%. MSCI has a consensus target price of $463.60, indicating a potential upside of 11.84%. Given MSCI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MSCI is more favorable than Zillow Group.

Summary

MSCI beats Zillow Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


MSCI Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Uber Technologies logo
UBER
Uber Technologies
1.8$51.75+0.6%$91.27 billion$14.15 billion-13.00
Fidelity National Information Services logo
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
2.3$138.00+0.6%$85.72 billion$10.33 billion-766.67
MercadoLibre logo
MELI
MercadoLibre
1.7$1,638.11+1.5%$81.69 billion$2.30 billion-10,237.55Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
NetEase logo
NTES
NetEase
1.8$109.85+1.1%$70.28 billion$8.51 billion35.95Dividend Cut
News Coverage
Global Payments logo
GPN
Global Payments
2.1$197.99+0.7%$58.46 billion$4.91 billion117.85Insider Selling
Zillow Group logo
ZG
Zillow Group
1.1$169.82+6.2%$40.87 billion$2.74 billion-86.64High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Zillow Group logo
Z
Zillow Group
1.2$161.33+5.5%$38.83 billion$2.74 billion-82.31Insider Selling
Gap Up
eBay logo
EBAY
eBay
2.2$56.42+0.7%$38.39 billion$10.80 billion7.85
CoStar Group logo
CSGP
CoStar Group
1.8$823.76+0.5%$32.47 billion$1.40 billion110.57Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Etsy logo
ETSY
Etsy
1.3$220.27+10.3%$27.77 billion$818.38 million122.37Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
FLEETCOR Technologies logo
FLT
FLEETCOR Technologies
1.7$277.31+2.1%$23.13 billion$2.65 billion33.45Analyst Report
Gap Down
Farfetch logo
FTCH
Farfetch
1.5$65.88+3.1%$22.37 billion$1.02 billion-19.10Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
TCOM
Trip.com Group
0.9$39.45+0.3%$21.82 billion$5.13 billion-73.06Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Lyft logo
LYFT
Lyft
1.5$55.70+0.4%$17.69 billion$3.62 billion-10.37Insider Selling
Broadridge Financial Solutions logo
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
2.0$142.49+0.5%$16.50 billion$4.53 billion35.18
Akamai Technologies logo
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
1.9$94.50+1.0%$15.38 billion$2.89 billion27.71Analyst Revision
Fair Isaac logo
FICO
Fair Isaac
1.8$457.55+2.0%$13.38 billion$1.29 billion57.99News Coverage
The Western Union logo
WU
The Western Union
2.1$23.22+1.3%$9.54 billion$5.29 billion16.01Insider Selling
News Coverage
WEX logo
WEX
WEX
1.6$208.35+4.6%$9.19 billion$1.72 billion72.85Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Fiverr International logo
FVRR
Fiverr International
1.2$269.97+2.2%$8.37 billion$107.07 million-627.82
Nielsen logo
NLSN
Nielsen
1.1$22.41+1.3%$8.02 billion$6.50 billion-53.36Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
HealthEquity logo
HQY
HealthEquity
1.6$82.35+1.5%$6.77 billion$531.99 million1,647.33
CNXC
Concentrix
1.8$123.51+4.8%$6.42 billion$4.72 billion20.97Gap Up
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
0.8$76.50+2.1%$6.12 billionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
CDK Global logo
CDK
CDK Global
2.2$50.14+1.8%$6.10 billion$1.96 billion33.88Dividend Announcement
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers logo
RBA
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
2.0$54.32+0.9%$5.97 billion$1.32 billion34.38Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Grubhub logo
GRUB
Grubhub
1.2$64.07+1.6%$5.94 billion$1.31 billion-51.26
American Well logo
AMWL
American Well
1.3$24.47+3.7%$5.75 billionN/A0.00Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
TriNet Group logo
TNET
TriNet Group
1.5$80.27+2.9%$5.30 billion$3.86 billion18.50Gap Down
Maximus logo
MMS
Maximus
2.3$81.28+2.0%$4.99 billion$3.46 billion23.91Gap Down
MPLN
MultiPlan
1.7$7.11+1.8%$4.75 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
Alliance Data Systems logo
ADS
Alliance Data Systems
2.6$96.50+4.9%$4.61 billion$5.58 billion13.85Gap Up
WNS logo
WNS
WNS
1.8$74.71+3.1%$3.72 billion$928.30 million36.99Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
Envestnet logo
ENV
Envestnet
1.6$64.02+25.0%$3.45 billion$900.13 million-492.46Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.6$181.93+1.3%$3.32 billion$571.85 million22.54Gap Down
HMS logo
HMSY
HMS
1.6$36.79+0.1%$3.26 billion$626.40 million60.30Earnings Announcement
ExlService logo
EXLS
ExlService
1.3$84.62+1.1%$2.86 billion$991.35 million37.28Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
PHR
Phreesia
1.6$61.25+2.0%$2.70 billion$124.78 million-102.08Gap Up
ACCD
Accolade
1.5$44.32+1.2%$2.45 billionN/A0.00
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.5$83.63+2.5%$2.35 billion$133.96 million132.75Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$34.71+0.5%$2.33 billion$354.20 million38.57
EVO Payments logo
EVOP
EVO Payments
1.4$25.46+5.8%$2.10 billion$485.78 million-94.30Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
B. Riley Financial logo
RILY
B. Riley Financial
1.1$65.82+10.0%$1.77 billion$652.11 million41.66Dividend Increase
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
RPAY
Repay
1.6$21.80+1.1%$1.73 billion$104.60 million-64.12Upcoming Earnings
Cardtronics logo
CATM
Cardtronics
1.3$38.55+0.2%$1.71 billion$1.35 billion77.10Earnings Announcement
CBIZ logo
CBZ
CBIZ
1.4$30.15+1.9%$1.64 billion$948.42 million21.69Insider Selling
Gap Down
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
1.6$23.89+2.6%$1.27 billion$490.34 million40.49Gap Up
Radware logo
RDWR
Radware
1.7$26.06+1.2%$1.22 billion$252.07 million89.86
CNDT
Conduent
1.4$5.38+2.2%$1.13 billion$4.47 billion-1.64Analyst Upgrade
Insider Buying
Gap Down
i3 Verticals logo
IIIV
i3 Verticals
1.9$33.20+0.0%$1.07 billion$150.13 million-830.00
This page was last updated on 2/27/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.