Which has higher valuation and earnings, NDAQ or SPGI?

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Nasdaq. Nasdaq is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nasdaq $8.22B 5.95 $1.79B $3.32 26.03 S&P Global $15.34B 8.56 $4.47B $15.80 28.06

Is NDAQ or SPGI more profitable?

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 23.15%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 17.51% beat S&P Global's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nasdaq 23.15% 17.51% 7.06% S&P Global 30.37% 17.26% 9.21%

Does the media prefer NDAQ or SPGI?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 29 more articles in the media than Nasdaq. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 17 mentions for Nasdaq. Nasdaq's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Nasdaq is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nasdaq 9 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive S&P Global 19 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SPGI or SSNC?

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio S&P Global $15.34B 8.56 $4.47B $15.80 28.06 SS&C Technologies $6.27B 2.55 $796.90M $3.23 20.53

Does the media prefer SPGI or SSNC?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 36 more articles in the media than SS&C Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 10 mentions for SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that SS&C Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment S&P Global 19 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SS&C Technologies 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, SPGI or APTV?

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aptiv. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio S&P Global $15.34B 8.56 $4.47B $15.80 28.06 Aptiv $20.66B 0.60 $165M $1.69 34.82

Is SPGI or APTV more profitable?

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.77%. Aptiv's return on equity of 17.83% beat S&P Global's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets S&P Global 30.37% 17.26% 9.21% Aptiv 1.77% 17.83% 7.08%

Does the media prefer SPGI or APTV?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 41 more articles in the media than Aptiv. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 5 mentions for Aptiv. Aptiv's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Aptiv is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment S&P Global 19 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aptiv 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to BR or SPGI?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 30 more articles in the media than Broadridge Financial Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 16 mentions for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Broadridge Financial Solutions 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive S&P Global 19 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SPGI or EFX?

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio S&P Global $15.34B 8.56 $4.47B $15.80 28.06 Equifax $6.07B 3.43 $660.30M $5.68 30.77

Is SPGI or EFX more profitable?

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Equifax's net margin of 11.12%. Equifax's return on equity of 20.41% beat S&P Global's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets S&P Global 30.37% 17.26% 9.21% Equifax 11.12% 20.41% 8.27%

Does the media favor SPGI or EFX?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 21 more articles in the media than Equifax. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 25 mentions for Equifax. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment S&P Global 19 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 7 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Equifax 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

S&P Global (SPGI) Competitors

$443.32 -3.90 (-0.87%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$444.50 +1.18 (+0.27%)

As of 07:51 PM Eastern

Compare

SPGI vs. NDAQ, SSNC, APTV, BR, and EFX

Should you buy S&P Global stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares S&P Global with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with S&P Global include Nasdaq (NDAQ), SS&C Technologies (SSNC), Aptiv (APTV), Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR), and Equifax (EFX).

How does S&P Global compare to Nasdaq?

Nasdaq (NASDAQ:NDAQ) and S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Nasdaq pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Nasdaq pays out 37.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nasdaq has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and S&P Global has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Nasdaq has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 23.15%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 17.51% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nasdaq	23.15%	17.51%	7.06%
S&P Global	30.37%	17.26%	9.21%

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Nasdaq. Nasdaq is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nasdaq	$8.22B	5.95	$1.79B	$3.32	26.03
S&P Global	$15.34B	8.56	$4.47B	$15.80	28.06

In the previous week, S&P Global had 29 more articles in the media than Nasdaq. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 17 mentions for Nasdaq. Nasdaq's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Nasdaq is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nasdaq	9 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
S&P Global	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Nasdaq currently has a consensus target price of $107.54, indicating a potential upside of 24.42%. S&P Global has a consensus target price of $534.35, indicating a potential upside of 20.53%. Given Nasdaq's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Nasdaq is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nasdaq	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

72.5% of Nasdaq shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Nasdaq shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

S&P Global beats Nasdaq on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to SS&C Technologies?

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and SS&C Technologies (NASDAQ:SSNC) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of SS&C Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of SS&C Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to SS&C Technologies' net margin of 12.65%. SS&C Technologies' return on equity of 20.15% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
S&P Global	30.37%	17.26%	9.21%
SS&C Technologies	12.65%	20.15%	7.05%

S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SS&C Technologies has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. SS&C Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. S&P Global pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SS&C Technologies pays out 33.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and SS&C Technologies has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $534.35, indicating a potential upside of 20.53%. SS&C Technologies has a consensus price target of $96.13, indicating a potential upside of 44.98%. Given SS&C Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SS&C Technologies is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
SS&C Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global	$15.34B	8.56	$4.47B	$15.80	28.06
SS&C Technologies	$6.27B	2.55	$796.90M	$3.23	20.53

In the previous week, S&P Global had 36 more articles in the media than SS&C Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 10 mentions for SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that SS&C Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
S&P Global	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SS&C Technologies	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

S&P Global beats SS&C Technologies on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to Aptiv?

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Aptiv (NYSE:APTV) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.77%. Aptiv's return on equity of 17.83% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
S&P Global	30.37%	17.26%	9.21%
Aptiv	1.77%	17.83%	7.08%

S&P Global currently has a consensus price target of $534.35, suggesting a potential upside of 20.53%. Aptiv has a consensus price target of $82.50, suggesting a potential upside of 40.18%. Given Aptiv's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aptiv is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Aptiv	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	22 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aptiv has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, S&P Global had 41 more articles in the media than Aptiv. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 5 mentions for Aptiv. Aptiv's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Aptiv is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
S&P Global	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aptiv	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Aptiv pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. S&P Global pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aptiv pays out 52.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Aptiv shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Aptiv shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aptiv. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global	$15.34B	8.56	$4.47B	$15.80	28.06
Aptiv	$20.66B	0.60	$165M	$1.69	34.82

Summary

Aptiv beats S&P Global on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to Broadridge Financial Solutions?

Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE:BR) and S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, S&P Global had 30 more articles in the media than Broadridge Financial Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 16 mentions for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadridge Financial Solutions	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
S&P Global	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Broadridge Financial Solutions. Broadridge Financial Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadridge Financial Solutions	$6.89B	2.49	$839.50M	$9.34	15.90
S&P Global	$15.34B	8.56	$4.47B	$15.80	28.06

Broadridge Financial Solutions pays an annual dividend of $3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 41.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Broadridge Financial Solutions has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years and S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Broadridge Financial Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $221.57, indicating a potential upside of 49.16%. S&P Global has a consensus target price of $534.35, indicating a potential upside of 20.53%. Given Broadridge Financial Solutions' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Broadridge Financial Solutions is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadridge Financial Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

90.0% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions' net margin of 15.03%. Broadridge Financial Solutions' return on equity of 40.14% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadridge Financial Solutions	15.03%	40.14%	12.87%
S&P Global	30.37%	17.26%	9.21%

Summary

S&P Global beats Broadridge Financial Solutions on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to Equifax?

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. S&P Global pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and Equifax has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

S&P Global has a net margin of 30.37% compared to Equifax's net margin of 11.12%. Equifax's return on equity of 20.41% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
S&P Global	30.37%	17.26%	9.21%
Equifax	11.12%	20.41%	8.27%

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $534.35, indicating a potential upside of 20.53%. Equifax has a consensus price target of $223.39, indicating a potential upside of 27.82%. Given Equifax's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Equifax is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Equifax	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, S&P Global had 21 more articles in the media than Equifax. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for S&P Global and 25 mentions for Equifax. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat S&P Global's score of 0.66 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
S&P Global	19 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	7 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Equifax	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Equifax shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Equifax shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global	$15.34B	8.56	$4.47B	$15.80	28.06
Equifax	$6.07B	3.43	$660.30M	$5.68	30.77

Summary

S&P Global beats Equifax on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get S&P Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SPGI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SPGI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	S&P Global	Securities Exchanges Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$132.38B	$64.98B	$14.23B	$23.61B
Dividend Yield	0.87%	1.47%	5.67%	4.01%
P/E Ratio	28.06	19.50	20.56	31.06
Price / Sales	8.56	7.46	43.84	21.43
Price / Cash	20.19	17.20	19.63	25.43
Price / Book	4.24	5.10	2.26	4.79
Net Income	$4.47B	$2.40B	$1.14B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	8.88%	6.69%	0.48%	1.67%
1 Month Performance	4.27%	-0.46%	2.23%	2.58%
1 Year Performance	-16.36%	-15.05%	12.87%	17.63%

S&P Global Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SPGI S&P Global	4.935 of 5 stars	$443.32 -0.9%	$534.35 +20.5%	-15.8%	$132.38B	$15.34B	28.06	44,500	Trending News Analyst Upgrade
NDAQ Nasdaq	4.9571 of 5 stars	$76.85 -2.2%	$106.79 +39.0%	-6.1%	$43.46B	$8.22B	23.15	9,525
SSNC SS&C Technologies	4.973 of 5 stars	$62.94 -1.1%	$96.13 +52.7%	-21.8%	$15.16B	$6.27B	19.49	28,800	Gap Up
APTV Aptiv	4.7314 of 5 stars	$59.31 -1.7%	$82.46 +39.0%	-17.5%	$12.55B	$20.40B	35.09	140,000	Analyst Forecast
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions	4.9641 of 5 stars	$136.16 -1.3%	$221.57 +62.7%	-40.2%	$15.75B	$7.32B	14.58	15,000	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SPGI) was last updated on 7/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

S&P Global (SPGI) Competitors