Which has better valuation & earnings, NDAQ or SPGI?

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Nasdaq. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nasdaq, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nasdaq $8.22B 6.27 $1.79B $3.43 26.88 S&P Global $15.34B 7.52 $4.47B $16.38 23.88

Is NDAQ or SPGI more profitable?

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 22.60%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 18.38% beat S&P Global's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nasdaq 22.60% 18.38% 7.63% S&P Global 31.37% 17.74% 9.24%

Does the media refer more to NDAQ or SPGI?

In the previous week, Nasdaq had 3 more articles in the media than S&P Global. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Nasdaq and 14 mentions for S&P Global. Nasdaq's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat S&P Global's score of 0.26 indicating that Nasdaq is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nasdaq 2 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral S&P Global 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SSNC or SPGI?

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio SS&C Technologies $6.27B 2.96 $796.90M $3.48 22.72 S&P Global $15.34B 7.52 $4.47B $16.38 23.88

Does the media prefer SSNC or SPGI?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 12 more articles in the media than SS&C Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for S&P Global and 2 mentions for SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat S&P Global's score of 0.26 indicating that SS&C Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SS&C Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive S&P Global 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, SPGI or APTV?

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aptiv. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio S&P Global $15.34B 7.52 $4.47B $16.38 23.88 Aptiv $20.40B 0.45 $165M $1.06 41.42

Is SPGI or APTV more profitable?

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.17%. S&P Global's return on equity of 17.74% beat Aptiv's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets S&P Global 31.37% 17.74% 9.24% Aptiv 1.17% 17.10% 7.03%

Does the media refer more to SPGI or APTV?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 11 more articles in the media than Aptiv. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for S&P Global and 3 mentions for Aptiv. S&P Global's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Aptiv's score of 0.17 indicating that S&P Global is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment S&P Global 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Aptiv 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer BR or SPGI?

In the previous week, S&P Global had 4 more articles in the media than Broadridge Financial Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for S&P Global and 10 mentions for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat S&P Global's score of 0.26 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Broadridge Financial Solutions 3 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive S&P Global 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, EFX or SPGI?

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Equifax $6.44B 2.60 $660.30M $5.69 25.09 S&P Global $15.34B 7.52 $4.47B $16.38 23.88

Is EFX or SPGI more profitable?

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat S&P Global's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Equifax 10.73% 21.61% 8.41% S&P Global 31.37% 17.74% 9.24%

Does the media prefer EFX or SPGI?

In the previous week, Equifax and Equifax both had 14 articles in the media. S&P Global's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Equifax's score of 0.02 indicating that S&P Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Equifax 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral S&P Global 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

S&P Global (SPGI) Competitors

$396.06 +5.14 (+1.31%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$396.06 +0.00 (+0.00%)

As of 05:24 PM Eastern

Compare

SPGI vs. NDAQ, SSNC, APTV, BR, and EFX

Should you buy S&P Global stock or one of its competitors? S&P Global's main competitors and comparable companies include Nasdaq (NDAQ), SS&C Technologies (SSNC), Aptiv (APTV), Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR), and Equifax (EFX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does S&P Global compare to Nasdaq?

Nasdaq (NASDAQ:NDAQ) and S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Nasdaq pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Nasdaq pays out 36.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Nasdaq has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years and S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

72.5% of Nasdaq shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Nasdaq shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Nasdaq. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nasdaq, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nasdaq	$8.22B	6.27	$1.79B	$3.43	26.88
S&P Global	$15.34B	7.52	$4.47B	$16.38	23.88

Nasdaq currently has a consensus target price of $109.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.51%. S&P Global has a consensus target price of $522.24, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Nasdaq.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nasdaq	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 22.60%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 18.38% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nasdaq	22.60%	18.38%	7.63%
S&P Global	31.37%	17.74%	9.24%

In the previous week, Nasdaq had 3 more articles in the media than S&P Global. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Nasdaq and 14 mentions for S&P Global. Nasdaq's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat S&P Global's score of 0.26 indicating that Nasdaq is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nasdaq	2 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
S&P Global	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Nasdaq has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

S&P Global beats Nasdaq on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to SS&C Technologies?

SS&C Technologies (NASDAQ:SSNC) and S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, S&P Global had 12 more articles in the media than SS&C Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for S&P Global and 2 mentions for SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat S&P Global's score of 0.26 indicating that SS&C Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SS&C Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
S&P Global	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

96.9% of SS&C Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.0% of SS&C Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than SS&C Technologies. SS&C Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SS&C Technologies	$6.27B	2.96	$796.90M	$3.48	22.72
S&P Global	$15.34B	7.52	$4.47B	$16.38	23.88

SS&C Technologies has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

SS&C Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $92.63, indicating a potential upside of 17.13%. S&P Global has a consensus price target of $522.24, indicating a potential upside of 33.49%. Given S&P Global's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe S&P Global is more favorable than SS&C Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SS&C Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to SS&C Technologies' net margin of 13.16%. SS&C Technologies' return on equity of 21.20% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SS&C Technologies	13.16%	21.20%	7.19%
S&P Global	31.37%	17.74%	9.24%

SS&C Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. SS&C Technologies pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. SS&C Technologies has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Summary

S&P Global beats SS&C Technologies on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to Aptiv?

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Aptiv (NYSE:APTV) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Aptiv's net margin of 1.17%. S&P Global's return on equity of 17.74% beat Aptiv's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
S&P Global	31.37%	17.74%	9.24%
Aptiv	1.17%	17.10%	7.03%

87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Aptiv shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Aptiv shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $522.24, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Aptiv has a consensus price target of $73.60, suggesting a potential upside of 67.60%. Given Aptiv's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aptiv is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Aptiv	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

In the previous week, S&P Global had 11 more articles in the media than Aptiv. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for S&P Global and 3 mentions for Aptiv. S&P Global's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Aptiv's score of 0.17 indicating that S&P Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
S&P Global	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Aptiv	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

S&P Global has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aptiv has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aptiv. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global	$15.34B	7.52	$4.47B	$16.38	23.88
Aptiv	$20.40B	0.45	$165M	$1.06	41.42

Summary

S&P Global beats Aptiv on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to Broadridge Financial Solutions?

Broadridge Financial Solutions (NYSE:BR) and S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions' net margin of 15.04%. Broadridge Financial Solutions' return on equity of 40.25% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadridge Financial Solutions	15.04%	40.25%	12.97%
S&P Global	31.37%	17.74%	9.24%

90.0% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Broadridge Financial Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadridge Financial Solutions pays an annual dividend of $4.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Broadridge Financial Solutions pays out 45.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Broadridge Financial Solutions has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years and S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Broadridge Financial Solutions has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, S&P Global had 4 more articles in the media than Broadridge Financial Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for S&P Global and 10 mentions for Broadridge Financial Solutions. Broadridge Financial Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat S&P Global's score of 0.26 indicating that Broadridge Financial Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadridge Financial Solutions	3 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
S&P Global	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Broadridge Financial Solutions. Broadridge Financial Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadridge Financial Solutions	$7.48B	2.40	$1.12B	$9.62	16.53
S&P Global	$15.34B	7.52	$4.47B	$16.38	23.88

Broadridge Financial Solutions currently has a consensus target price of $216.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.82%. S&P Global has a consensus target price of $522.24, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Broadridge Financial Solutions' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Broadridge Financial Solutions is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadridge Financial Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Summary

S&P Global beats Broadridge Financial Solutions on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does S&P Global compare to Equifax?

Equifax (NYSE:EFX) and S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

96.2% of Equifax shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of S&P Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Equifax has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&P Global has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. S&P Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Equifax	$6.44B	2.60	$660.30M	$5.69	25.09
S&P Global	$15.34B	7.52	$4.47B	$16.38	23.88

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Equifax	10.73%	21.61%	8.41%
S&P Global	31.37%	17.74%	9.24%

In the previous week, Equifax and Equifax both had 14 articles in the media. S&P Global's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Equifax's score of 0.02 indicating that S&P Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Equifax	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
S&P Global	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Equifax presently has a consensus price target of $206.90, suggesting a potential upside of 44.92%. S&P Global has a consensus price target of $522.24, suggesting a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Equifax's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Equifax is more favorable than S&P Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Equifax	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
S&P Global	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&P Global pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and S&P Global has raised its dividend for 53 consecutive years.

Summary

S&P Global beats Equifax on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get S&P Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SPGI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SPGI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	S&P Global	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$116.76B	$5.18B	$13.44B	$22.98B
Dividend Yield	1.00%	7.56%	6.03%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	24.18	29.62	24.47	28.01
Price / Sales	7.61	1,183.21	497.78	17.31
Price / Cash	17.44	47.67	29.46	19.10
Price / Book	3.79	3.49	2.71	4.72
Net Income	$4.47B	$415.67M	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.89%	-0.16%	-0.22%	0.89%
1 Month Performance	-10.66%	-2.77%	-3.18%	-4.97%
1 Year Performance	-17.19%	11.09%	11.24%	5.65%

S&P Global Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SPGI S&P Global	4.9611 of 5 stars	$396.06 +1.3%	$522.24 +31.9%	-18.5%	$116.76B	$15.34B	24.18	44,500	Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast
NDAQ Nasdaq	4.7726 of 5 stars	$92.62 -1.0%	$110.30 +19.1%	+5.2%	$51.77B	$8.74B	27.00	9,525
SSNC SS&C Technologies	4.7927 of 5 stars	$78.00 -0.8%	$92.63 +18.8%	-10.0%	$18.30B	$6.56B	22.41	28,800
APTV Aptiv	4.9551 of 5 stars	$43.63 -2.6%	$74.80 +71.4%	-50.1%	$9.06B	$20.52B	41.16	140,000	Analyst Forecast
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions	4.9061 of 5 stars	$162.86 -0.6%	$216.00 +32.6%	-32.2%	$18.57B	$7.48B	16.93	16,000	Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SPGI) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

S&P Global (SPGI) Competitors