NYSE:SPGI

S&P Global Competitors

$377.73
+1.29 (+0.34 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 02:45 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$373.02
Now: $377.73
$378.90
50-Day Range
$326.53
MA: $353.88
$378.07
52-Week Range
$265.92
Now: $377.73
$379.87
Volume39,650 shs
Average Volume1.70 million shs
Market Capitalization$90.99 billion
P/E Ratio37.85
Dividend Yield0.81%
Beta1

Competitors

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) Vs. ACN, FIS, FISV, ADP, GPN, and WM

Should you be buying SPGI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "business services" are considered alternatives and competitors to S&P Global, including Accenture (ACN), Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), Fiserv (FISV), Automatic Data Processing (ADP), Global Payments (GPN), and Waste Management (WM).

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Accenture (NYSE:ACN) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Accenture pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. S&P Global pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Accenture pays out 47.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years and Accenture has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

S&P Global has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Accenture has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares S&P Global and Accenture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&P Global33.20%1,009.75%25.22%
Accenture11.74%29.32%13.92%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares S&P Global and Accenture's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$6.70 billion13.58$2.12 billion$9.5339.64
Accenture$44.33 billion4.13$5.11 billion$7.4638.61

Accenture has higher revenue and earnings than S&P Global. Accenture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for S&P Global and Accenture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&P Global001213.08
Accenture071402.67

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $402.5385, indicating a potential upside of 6.55%. Accenture has a consensus price target of $276.0455, indicating a potential downside of 4.21%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Accenture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.9% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Accenture shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Accenture shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

S&P Global beats Accenture on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Fidelity National Information Services (NYSE:FIS) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Dividends

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. S&P Global pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years and Fidelity National Information Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fidelity National Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

S&P Global has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares S&P Global and Fidelity National Information Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&P Global33.20%1,009.75%25.22%
Fidelity National Information Services-0.83%6.88%4.08%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares S&P Global and Fidelity National Information Services' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$6.70 billion13.58$2.12 billion$9.5339.64
Fidelity National Information Services$10.33 billion9.17$298 million$5.6127.14

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fidelity National Information Services. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for S&P Global and Fidelity National Information Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&P Global001213.08
Fidelity National Information Services061712.79

S&P Global currently has a consensus price target of $402.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 6.55%. Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus price target of $159.9583, suggesting a potential upside of 5.08%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Fidelity National Information Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.9% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of S&P Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

S&P Global beats Fidelity National Information Services on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Fiserv (NASDAQ:FISV) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

S&P Global has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Fiserv has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares S&P Global and Fiserv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&P Global33.20%1,009.75%25.22%
Fiserv6.01%8.75%3.90%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares S&P Global and Fiserv's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$6.70 billion13.58$2.12 billion$9.5339.64
Fiserv$10.19 billion8.18$893 million$4.0031.16

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fiserv. Fiserv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for S&P Global and Fiserv, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&P Global001213.08
Fiserv032912.94

S&P Global currently has a consensus price target of $402.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 6.55%. Fiserv has a consensus price target of $129.7188, suggesting a potential upside of 4.07%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Fiserv.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.9% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Fiserv shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of S&P Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Fiserv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

S&P Global beats Fiserv on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

S&P Global has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.9% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Automatic Data Processing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of S&P Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Automatic Data Processing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares S&P Global and Automatic Data Processing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&P Global33.20%1,009.75%25.22%
Automatic Data Processing17.07%46.13%5.94%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares S&P Global and Automatic Data Processing's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$6.70 billion13.58$2.12 billion$9.5339.64
Automatic Data Processing$14.59 billion5.64$2.47 billion$5.9232.48

Automatic Data Processing has higher revenue and earnings than S&P Global. Automatic Data Processing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Automatic Data Processing pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. S&P Global pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 62.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years and Automatic Data Processing has raised its dividend for 47 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for S&P Global and Automatic Data Processing, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&P Global001213.08
Automatic Data Processing49502.06

S&P Global currently has a consensus price target of $402.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 6.55%. Automatic Data Processing has a consensus price target of $169.9375, suggesting a potential downside of 11.62%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Automatic Data Processing.

Summary

S&P Global beats Automatic Data Processing on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Global Payments (NYSE:GPN) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

S&P Global has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Global Payments has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.9% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of Global Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Global Payments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares S&P Global and Global Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&P Global33.20%1,009.75%25.22%
Global Payments6.75%6.46%4.06%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares S&P Global and Global Payments' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$6.70 billion13.58$2.12 billion$9.5339.64
Global Payments$4.91 billion12.75$430.61 million$5.8636.22

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than Global Payments. Global Payments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Global Payments pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. S&P Global pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Payments pays out 13.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years and Global Payments has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. S&P Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for S&P Global and Global Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&P Global001213.08
Global Payments042502.86

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $402.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 6.55%. Global Payments has a consensus price target of $211.3214, suggesting a potential downside of 0.56%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Global Payments.

Summary

S&P Global beats Global Payments on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and Waste Management (NYSE:WM) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

S&P Global has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.9% of S&P Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.4% of Waste Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of S&P Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares S&P Global and Waste Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&P Global33.20%1,009.75%25.22%
Waste Management10.66%25.84%6.54%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares S&P Global and Waste Management's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$6.70 billion13.58$2.12 billion$9.5339.64
Waste Management$15.46 billion3.68$1.67 billion$4.4030.59

S&P Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Waste Management. Waste Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Waste Management pays an annual dividend of $2.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. S&P Global pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waste Management pays out 52.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has raised its dividend for 48 consecutive years and Waste Management has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for S&P Global and Waste Management, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&P Global001213.08
Waste Management25602.31

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $402.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 6.55%. Waste Management has a consensus price target of $122.5833, suggesting a potential downside of 8.94%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe S&P Global is more favorable than Waste Management.

Summary

S&P Global beats Waste Management on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.


S&P Global Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Accenture logo
ACN
Accenture
2.0$288.04+0.5%$182.29 billion$44.33 billion35.47Insider Selling
Fidelity National Information Services logo
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
2.1$152.27+0.0%$94.70 billion$10.33 billion-845.94Analyst Report
News Coverage
Fiserv logo
FISV
Fiserv
1.5$124.62+0.4%$83.70 billion$10.19 billion94.41Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Automatic Data Processing logo
ADP
Automatic Data Processing
2.4$192.31+0.2%$82.49 billion$14.59 billion33.39
Global Payments logo
GPN
Global Payments
2.1$212.24+1.7%$63.71 billion$4.91 billion126.33Analyst Report
News Coverage
Waste Management logo
WM
Waste Management
1.8$134.60+0.1%$56.73 billion$15.46 billion35.61Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Spotify Technology logo
SPOT
Spotify Technology
1.3$272.12+3.0%$50.26 billion$7.58 billion-63.88
Thomson Reuters logo
TRI
Thomson Reuters
1.3$91.59+0.4%$45.51 billion$5.91 billion24.36Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
DocuSign logo
DOCU
DocuSign
1.7$219.11+1.9%$44.78 billion$973.97 million-185.69
IHS Markit logo
INFO
IHS Markit
1.6$103.82+0.3%$43.86 billion$4.29 billion47.84Analyst Report
News Coverage
Rocket Companies logo
RKT
Rocket Companies
1.1$21.55+2.1%$43.68 billionN/A0.00
IQVIA logo
IQV
IQVIA
1.7$217.57+0.6%$41.46 billion$11.09 billion239.09Upcoming Earnings
Unusual Options Activity
Trane Technologies logo
TT
Trane Technologies
1.9$166.67+3.4%$41.08 billion$16.60 billion44.68Analyst Report
Palantir Technologies logo
PLTR
Palantir Technologies
1.2$21.44+2.3%$39.98 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Aptiv logo
APTV
Aptiv
2.1$134.60+4.2%$37.95 billion$14.36 billion20.21
Paychex logo
PAYX
Paychex
1.5$97.12+0.7%$34.75 billion$4.04 billion33.15
Republic Services logo
RSG
Republic Services
2.6$104.85+0.2%$33.39 billion$10.30 billion32.87Analyst Report
Waste Connections logo
WCN
Waste Connections
1.9$116.57+0.1%$30.55 billion$5.39 billion149.45Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Verisk Analytics logo
VRSK
Verisk Analytics
1.7$184.00+0.3%$29.96 billion$2.61 billion58.97Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Copart logo
CPRT
Copart
1.3$120.84+0.8%$28.77 billion$2.21 billion42.40Decrease in Short Interest
Slack Technologies logo
WORK
Slack Technologies
1.2$42.04+0.6%$24.37 billion$630.42 million-72.48Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
FLEETCOR Technologies logo
FLT
FLEETCOR Technologies
1.9$285.30+2.0%$24.27 billion$2.65 billion34.41Analyst Revision
Futu logo
FUTU
Futu
1.4$136.67+30.2%$24.12 billion$136.28 million162.70News Coverage
Gap Up
Equifax logo
EFX
Equifax
1.4$191.44+1.0%$23.09 billion$3.51 billion53.33Upcoming Earnings
TransUnion logo
TRU
TransUnion
1.8$96.65+0.2%$18.53 billion$2.66 billion57.19Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Broadridge Financial Solutions logo
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
1.8$158.11+1.4%$18.06 billion$4.53 billion39.04
WPP logo
WPP
WPP
1.5$65.50+3.7%$17.61 billion$16.90 billion13.13
Omnicom Group logo
OMC
Omnicom Group
2.0$78.59+0.9%$17.06 billion$14.95 billion17.78Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gartner logo
IT
Gartner
1.0$190.06+1.0%$17.03 billion$4.25 billion79.86
GDS logo
GDS
GDS
1.5$80.16+1.9%$14.70 billion$592.15 million-154.15
PagSeguro Digital logo
PAGS
PagSeguro Digital
1.9$43.60+2.3%$14.62 billion$1.39 billion52.53Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
FactSet Research Systems logo
FDS
FactSet Research Systems
1.4$319.19+0.6%$12.01 billion$1.49 billion32.44Decrease in Short Interest
The Interpublic Group of Companies logo
IPG
The Interpublic Group of Companies
2.2$29.97+1.6%$11.89 billion$10.22 billion20.81
Booz Allen Hamilton logo
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
2.1$83.53+1.6%$11.68 billion$7.46 billion22.76
Black Knight logo
BKI
Black Knight
1.9$74.11+1.3%$11.46 billion$1.18 billion49.08Analyst Report
News Coverage
Elastic logo
ESTC
Elastic
1.8$120.53+2.2%$11.05 billion$427.62 million-80.35
The Western Union logo
WU
The Western Union
1.9$25.96+0.7%$10.62 billion$5.29 billion17.90Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
GFL Environmental logo
GFL
GFL Environmental
1.4$32.84+2.0%$10.50 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Morningstar logo
MORN
Morningstar
0.8$236.42+0.5%$10.21 billion$1.18 billion58.09
WEX logo
WEX
WEX
1.6$219.29+3.2%$10.00 billion$1.72 billion76.68Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Robert Half International logo
RHI
Robert Half International
2.0$81.12+0.4%$9.22 billion$6.07 billion28.46Upcoming Earnings
Nielsen logo
NLSN
Nielsen
1.1$24.61+2.8%$9.07 billion$6.50 billion-58.59
Genpact logo
G
Genpact
1.9$44.51+0.0%$8.33 billion$3.52 billion27.65Insider Selling
CNXC
Concentrix
1.7$153.02+2.1%$8.13 billion$4.72 billion25.98
Shift4 Payments logo
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
0.9$94.67+0.1%$7.62 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers logo
RBA
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
1.6$62.01+1.0%$6.88 billion$1.32 billion39.25Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
GSX Techedu logo
GSX
GSX Techedu
1.3$27.55+3.1%$6.37 billion$303.78 million-72.50
Stericycle logo
SRCL
Stericycle
0.9$68.13+0.4%$6.28 billion$3.31 billion-19.08
OCFT
OneConnect Financial Technology
1.4$14.73+6.4%$6.12 billion$330.51 million-61.38Decrease in Short Interest
ManpowerGroup logo
MAN
ManpowerGroup
2.0$112.86+3.3%$5.99 billion$20.86 billion78.38News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/20/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.