NOTE vs. LQDT, CASS, ACCD, SEZL, RGP, PRTH, ZH, SHAP, MPLN, and RMNI
Should you be buying FiscalNote stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of FiscalNote include Liquidity Services (LQDT), Cass Information Systems (CASS), Accolade (ACCD), Sezzle (SEZL), Resources Connection (RGP), Priority Technology (PRTH), Zhihu (ZH), Spree Acquisition Corp. 1 (SHAP), MultiPlan (MPLN), and Rimini Street (RMNI). These companies are all part of the "business services, not elsewhere classified" industry.
Liquidity Services (NASDAQ:LQDT) and FiscalNote (NYSE:NOTE) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and community ranking.
Liquidity Services presently has a consensus target price of $27.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.63%. FiscalNote has a consensus target price of $4.44, suggesting a potential upside of 289.25%. Given Liquidity Services' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FiscalNote is more favorable than Liquidity Services.
Liquidity Services received 372 more outperform votes than FiscalNote when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 69.61% of users gave FiscalNote an outperform vote while only 69.00% of users gave Liquidity Services an outperform vote.
Liquidity Services has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FiscalNote has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Liquidity Services has a net margin of 6.30% compared to Liquidity Services' net margin of -48.89%. FiscalNote's return on equity of 18.51% beat Liquidity Services' return on equity.
Liquidity Services has higher revenue and earnings than FiscalNote. FiscalNote is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liquidity Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, FiscalNote had 2 more articles in the media than Liquidity Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for FiscalNote and 0 mentions for Liquidity Services. FiscalNote's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Liquidity Services' score of -0.25 indicating that Liquidity Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.
71.2% of Liquidity Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.3% of FiscalNote shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Liquidity Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.6% of FiscalNote shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
Liquidity Services beats FiscalNote on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get FiscalNote News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOTE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOTE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
FiscalNote Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
