FGF vs. KINS, ICCH, OXBR, CNFR, UNAM, BRK.A, BRK.B, PGR, CB, and AIG
Should you be buying Fundamental Global stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fundamental Global include Kingstone Companies (KINS), ICC (ICCH), Oxbridge Re (OXBR), Conifer (CNFR), Unico American (UNAM), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), Progressive (PGR), Chubb (CB), and American International Group (AIG). These companies are all part of the "fire, marine, & casualty insurance" industry.
Fundamental Global (NASDAQ:FGF) and Kingstone Companies (NASDAQ:KINS) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, community ranking, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.
Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $1.75, indicating a potential downside of 63.54%. Given Kingstone Companies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kingstone Companies is more favorable than Fundamental Global.
Fundamental Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kingstone Companies. Kingstone Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fundamental Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
3.1% of Fundamental Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of Kingstone Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 62.7% of Fundamental Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Kingstone Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Kingstone Companies received 186 more outperform votes than Fundamental Global when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 65.96% of users gave Kingstone Companies an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Fundamental Global an outperform vote.
Kingstone Companies has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of -6.73%. Kingstone Companies' return on equity of -3.04% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity.
In the previous week, Kingstone Companies had 1 more articles in the media than Fundamental Global. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Kingstone Companies and 1 mentions for Fundamental Global. Fundamental Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kingstone Companies'average media sentiment score.
Summary
Kingstone Companies beats Fundamental Global on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fundamental Global News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FGF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FGF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Fundamental Global Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
