FBIN vs. DOOR, AMWD, JELD, DG, TSCO, EBAY, DECK, DLTR, CVNA, and QSR
Should you be buying Fortune Brands Innovations stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Fortune Brands Innovations include Masonite International (DOOR), American Woodmark (AMWD), JELD-WEN (JELD), Dollar General (DG), Tractor Supply (TSCO), eBay (EBAY), Deckers Outdoor (DECK), Dollar Tree (DLTR), Carvana (CVNA), and Restaurant Brands International (QSR).
Masonite International (NYSE:DOOR) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and valuation.
Masonite International has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Masonite International currently has a consensus price target of $116.89, indicating a potential downside of 12.01%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $79.22, indicating a potential upside of 13.97%. Given Masonite International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Masonite International.
Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of 8.87% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 5.08%. Masonite International's return on equity of 22.88% beat Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity.
Masonite International received 589 more outperform votes than Fortune Brands Innovations when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 73.24% of users gave Masonite International an outperform vote while only 33.33% of users gave Fortune Brands Innovations an outperform vote.
97.1% of Masonite International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Masonite International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 1 more articles in the media than Masonite International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for Masonite International. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Masonite International's score of 0.39 indicating that Masonite International is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Masonite International. Masonite International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Fortune Brands Innovations beats Masonite International on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Fortune Brands Innovations News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FBIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FBIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartThis chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Fortune Brands Innovations Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools