XPOF vs. RSI, SGHC, MSGE, FBYD, GENI, SEAT, GDEN, EVRI, GAMB, and CLOE
Should you be buying Xponential Fitness stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Xponential Fitness include Rush Street Interactive (RSI), Super Group (SGHC), Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE), Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD), Genius Sports (GENI), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Golden Entertainment (GDEN), Everi (EVRI), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), and Clover Leaf Capital (CLOE). These companies are all part of the "miscellaneous amusement & recreation services" industry.
Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) and Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, community ranking, media sentiment and earnings.
Xponential Fitness presently has a consensus target price of $21.50, indicating a potential upside of 93.87%. Rush Street Interactive has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential downside of 4.49%. Given Xponential Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Rush Street Interactive.
Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.
58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.8% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 56.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
In the previous week, Xponential Fitness had 3 more articles in the media than Rush Street Interactive. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Xponential Fitness and 1 mentions for Rush Street Interactive. Xponential Fitness' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Rush Street Interactive's score of 0.50 indicating that Xponential Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Xponential Fitness has a net margin of 1.90% compared to Rush Street Interactive's net margin of -1.58%. Xponential Fitness' return on equity of -7.65% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity.
Rush Street Interactive received 6 more outperform votes than Xponential Fitness when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 60.81% of users gave Rush Street Interactive an outperform vote while only 55.71% of users gave Xponential Fitness an outperform vote.
Xponential Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rush Street Interactive. Rush Street Interactive is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xponential Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Xponential Fitness beats Rush Street Interactive on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Xponential Fitness News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for XPOF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding XPOF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Xponential Fitness Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
