Do analysts recommend FBYD or XPOF?

Xponential Fitness has a consensus target price of $8.44, suggesting a potential upside of 38.05%. Given Xponential Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Falcon's Beyond Global. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Falcon's Beyond Global 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Xponential Fitness 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.09

Does the media favor FBYD or XPOF?

In the previous week, Falcon's Beyond Global had 1 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Falcon's Beyond Global and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. Falcon's Beyond Global's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that Falcon's Beyond Global is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Falcon's Beyond Global 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Xponential Fitness 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to XPOF or IQ?

In the previous week, iQIYI had 6 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for iQIYI and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. iQIYI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that iQIYI is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Xponential Fitness 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive iQIYI 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend XPOF or BOWL?

Xponential Fitness presently has a consensus target price of $8.44, suggesting a potential upside of 38.05%. Given Xponential Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Bowlero. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Xponential Fitness 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.09 Bowlero 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor XPOF or BOWL?

In the previous week, Xponential Fitness and Xponential Fitness both had 1 articles in the media. Xponential Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Bowlero's score of -0.36 indicating that Xponential Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Xponential Fitness 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bowlero 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor XPOF or ACEL?

In the previous week, Accel Entertainment had 4 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Accel Entertainment and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. Accel Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that Accel Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Xponential Fitness 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Accel Entertainment 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to LUCK or XPOF?

In the previous week, Lucky Strike Entertainment had 4 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lucky Strike Entertainment and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. Lucky Strike Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that Lucky Strike Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lucky Strike Entertainment 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Xponential Fitness 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Xponential Fitness (XPOF) Competitors

$6.11 -0.17 (-2.68%)

Closing price 07/22/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$6.10 -0.02 (-0.28%)

As of 07/22/2026 04:20 PM Eastern

Compare

XPOF vs. FBYD, IQ, BOWL, ACEL, and LUCK

Should you buy Xponential Fitness stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Xponential Fitness with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Xponential Fitness include Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD), iQIYI (IQ), Bowlero (BOWL), Accel Entertainment (ACEL), and Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Falcon's Beyond Global?

Falcon's Beyond Global (NASDAQ:FBYD) and Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

38.9% of Falcon's Beyond Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Falcon's Beyond Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Falcon's Beyond Global has a beta of -2.84, meaning that its stock price is 384% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Falcon's Beyond Global has a net margin of 51.31% compared to Xponential Fitness' net margin of -11.28%. Xponential Fitness' return on equity of -3.40% beat Falcon's Beyond Global's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Falcon's Beyond Global	51.31%	-8.25%	-2.15%
Xponential Fitness	-11.28%	-3.40%	3.29%

In the previous week, Falcon's Beyond Global had 1 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Falcon's Beyond Global and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. Falcon's Beyond Global's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that Falcon's Beyond Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Falcon's Beyond Global	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Xponential Fitness	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Xponential Fitness has a consensus target price of $8.44, suggesting a potential upside of 38.05%. Given Xponential Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Falcon's Beyond Global.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Falcon's Beyond Global	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Xponential Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09

Falcon's Beyond Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Xponential Fitness. Xponential Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon's Beyond Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Falcon's Beyond Global	$14.90M	85.27	$2.84M	$0.21	49.90
Xponential Fitness	$314.88M	0.95	-$33.79M	-$1.38	N/A

Summary

Falcon's Beyond Global and Xponential Fitness tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Xponential Fitness compare to iQIYI?

Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) and iQIYI (NASDAQ:IQ) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

Xponential Fitness currently has a consensus price target of $8.44, indicating a potential upside of 38.05%. iQIYI has a consensus price target of $2.55, indicating a potential upside of 105.38%. Given iQIYI's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe iQIYI is more favorable than Xponential Fitness.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Xponential Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09
iQIYI	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, iQIYI has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

iQIYI has a net margin of -2.61% compared to Xponential Fitness' net margin of -11.28%. Xponential Fitness' return on equity of -3.40% beat iQIYI's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Xponential Fitness	-11.28%	-3.40%	3.29%
iQIYI	-2.61%	-4.72%	-1.36%

iQIYI has higher revenue and earnings than Xponential Fitness. iQIYI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xponential Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Xponential Fitness	$314.88M	0.95	-$33.79M	-$1.38	N/A
iQIYI	$3.80B	0.32	-$29.50M	-$0.10	N/A

In the previous week, iQIYI had 6 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for iQIYI and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. iQIYI's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that iQIYI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Xponential Fitness	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
iQIYI	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of iQIYI shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.8% of iQIYI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

iQIYI beats Xponential Fitness on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Bowlero?

Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) and Bowlero (NYSE:BOWL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Xponential Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bowlero. Bowlero is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xponential Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Xponential Fitness	$314.88M	0.95	-$33.79M	-$1.38	N/A
Bowlero	$1.19B	0.89	-$83.58M	-$0.61	N/A

Bowlero has a net margin of -6.63% compared to Xponential Fitness' net margin of -11.28%. Xponential Fitness' return on equity of -3.40% beat Bowlero's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Xponential Fitness	-11.28%	-3.40%	3.29%
Bowlero	-6.63%	-31.58%	1.31%

In the previous week, Xponential Fitness and Xponential Fitness both had 1 articles in the media. Xponential Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Bowlero's score of -0.36 indicating that Xponential Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Xponential Fitness	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bowlero	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Xponential Fitness presently has a consensus target price of $8.44, suggesting a potential upside of 38.05%. Given Xponential Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Bowlero.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Xponential Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09
Bowlero	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowlero has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Bowlero shares are held by institutional investors. 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 79.9% of Bowlero shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Xponential Fitness beats Bowlero on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Accel Entertainment?

Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) and Accel Entertainment (NYSE:ACEL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Accel Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Xponential Fitness. Xponential Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Accel Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Xponential Fitness	$314.88M	0.95	-$33.79M	-$1.38	N/A
Accel Entertainment	$1.33B	0.73	$51.47M	$0.60	19.84

Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Accel Entertainment has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Xponential Fitness currently has a consensus target price of $8.44, indicating a potential upside of 38.05%. Accel Entertainment has a consensus target price of $14.67, indicating a potential upside of 23.20%. Given Xponential Fitness' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Accel Entertainment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Xponential Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09
Accel Entertainment	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Accel Entertainment has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Xponential Fitness' net margin of -11.28%. Accel Entertainment's return on equity of 25.70% beat Xponential Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Xponential Fitness	-11.28%	-3.40%	3.29%
Accel Entertainment	3.79%	25.70%	6.37%

In the previous week, Accel Entertainment had 4 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Accel Entertainment and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. Accel Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that Accel Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Xponential Fitness	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Accel Entertainment	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of Accel Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.5% of Accel Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Accel Entertainment beats Xponential Fitness on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Lucky Strike Entertainment?

Lucky Strike Entertainment (NYSE:LUCK) and Xponential Fitness (NYSE:XPOF) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Lucky Strike Entertainment had 4 more articles in the media than Xponential Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lucky Strike Entertainment and 1 mentions for Xponential Fitness. Lucky Strike Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Xponential Fitness' score of 0.63 indicating that Lucky Strike Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lucky Strike Entertainment	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Xponential Fitness	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a net margin of -6.79% compared to Xponential Fitness' net margin of -11.28%. Lucky Strike Entertainment's return on equity of 0.00% beat Xponential Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lucky Strike Entertainment	-6.79%	N/A	-2.61%
Xponential Fitness	-11.28%	-3.40%	3.29%

Lucky Strike Entertainment has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xponential Fitness has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

68.1% of Lucky Strike Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 84.2% of Lucky Strike Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.1% of Xponential Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lucky Strike Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Xponential Fitness. Lucky Strike Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xponential Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lucky Strike Entertainment	$1.20B	0.81	-$10.02M	-$0.62	N/A
Xponential Fitness	$314.88M	0.95	-$33.79M	-$1.38	N/A

Lucky Strike Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $8.72, indicating a potential upside of 22.18%. Xponential Fitness has a consensus target price of $8.44, indicating a potential upside of 38.05%. Given Xponential Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xponential Fitness is more favorable than Lucky Strike Entertainment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lucky Strike Entertainment	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.15
Xponential Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.09

Summary

Lucky Strike Entertainment beats Xponential Fitness on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Xponential Fitness News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding XPOF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

XPOF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Xponential Fitness	LEISURE&REC SVS Industry	Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$308.82M	$8.78B	$7.13B	$23.48B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.52%	2.96%	4.18%
P/E Ratio	-4.43	18.20	19.94	30.84
Price / Sales	0.95	10.26	3.85	20.79
Price / Cash	6.52	11.45	15.30	32.60
Price / Book	-0.80	4.71	3.65	4.75
Net Income	-$33.79M	$353.22M	$247.04M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-10.18%	-1.00%	-1.85%	-0.34%
1 Month Performance	-9.99%	-2.98%	0.01%	1.51%
1 Year Performance	-43.59%	17.58%	-4.56%	14.61%

Xponential Fitness Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
XPOF Xponential Fitness	3.3816 of 5 stars	$6.11 -2.7%	$8.44 +38.0%	-44.2%	$308.82M	$314.88M	N/A	400	News Coverage
FBYD Falcon's Beyond Global	0.7594 of 5 stars	$10.75 -17.8%	N/A	+39.7%	$1.30B	$14.90M	51.19	116
IQ iQIYI	2.8566 of 5 stars	$1.16 +2.2%	$2.55 +120.5%	-37.7%	$1.11B	$3.80B	N/A	4,603	Analyst Upgrade
BOWL Bowlero	N/A	$7.35 +0.7%	N/A	-29.5%	$1.08B	$1.19B	N/A	11,374	News Coverage
ACEL Accel Entertainment	4.3387 of 5 stars	$12.47 -2.0%	$14.67 +17.7%	-6.8%	$1.01B	$1.33B	20.78	1,500	News Coverage Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:XPOF) was last updated on 7/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Xponential Fitness (XPOF) Competitors

XPOF vs. FBYD, IQ, BOWL, ACEL, and LUCK

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Falcon's Beyond Global?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to iQIYI?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Bowlero?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Accel Entertainment?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Lucky Strike Entertainment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

XPOF vs. The Competition

Xponential Fitness Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Xponential Fitness (XPOF) Competitors

XPOF vs. FBYD, IQ, BOWL, ACEL, and LUCK

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Falcon's Beyond Global?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FBYD or XPOF?

Which has more risk & volatility, FBYD or XPOF?

Is FBYD or XPOF more profitable?

Does the media favor FBYD or XPOF?

Do analysts recommend FBYD or XPOF?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FBYD or XPOF?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to iQIYI?

Do analysts rate XPOF or IQ?

Which has more volatility & risk, XPOF or IQ?

Is XPOF or IQ more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, XPOF or IQ?

Does the media refer more to XPOF or IQ?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in XPOF or IQ?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Bowlero?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, XPOF or BOWL?

Is XPOF or BOWL more profitable?

Does the media favor XPOF or BOWL?

Do analysts recommend XPOF or BOWL?

Which has more volatility and risk, XPOF or BOWL?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of XPOF or BOWL?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Accel Entertainment?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, XPOF or ACEL?

Which has more risk and volatility, XPOF or ACEL?

Do analysts rate XPOF or ACEL?

Is XPOF or ACEL more profitable?

Does the media favor XPOF or ACEL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in XPOF or ACEL?

Summary

How does Xponential Fitness compare to Lucky Strike Entertainment?

Does the media refer more to LUCK or XPOF?

Is LUCK or XPOF more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, LUCK or XPOF?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LUCK or XPOF?

Which has better earnings & valuation, LUCK or XPOF?

Do analysts recommend LUCK or XPOF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

XPOF vs. The Competition

Xponential Fitness Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools