Go Pro

Gambling.com Group (GAMB) Competitors

Gambling.com Group logo
$1.88 +0.04 (+2.17%)
Closing price 07/22/2026
Extended Trading
$1.88 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/22/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GAMB vs. CURI, SEAT, PUSA, CNVS, and GAIA

Should you buy Gambling.com Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gambling.com Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gambling.com Group include CuriosityStream (CURI), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Cineverse (CNVS), and Gaia (GAIA).

How does Gambling.com Group compare to CuriosityStream?

CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

CuriosityStream currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 128.14%. Gambling.com Group has a consensus price target of $7.13, indicating a potential upside of 278.99%. Given Gambling.com Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than CuriosityStream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

CuriosityStream has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

CuriosityStream has a net margin of -11.26% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CuriosityStream-11.26% -18.46% -10.83%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 4 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CuriosityStream and 0 mentions for Gambling.com Group. CuriosityStream's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.00 indicating that CuriosityStream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CuriosityStream Positive
Gambling.com Group Neutral

CuriosityStream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gambling.com Group. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CuriosityStream$71.66M2.16-$6.43M-$0.13N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

Summary

CuriosityStream and Gambling.com Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gambling.com Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Gambling.com Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.18-$429.30M-$69.61N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus target price of $9.43, suggesting a potential downside of 1.12%. Gambling.com Group has a consensus target price of $7.13, suggesting a potential upside of 278.99%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -27.44% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Gambling.com Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-82.25% 68.65% 5.92%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 10 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vivid Seats and 0 mentions for Gambling.com Group. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats Neutral
Gambling.com Group Neutral

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Vivid Seats on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Aureus Greenway has a beta of 5.09, meaning that its share price is 409% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Aureus Greenway has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gambling.com Group. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway$2.96M22.26-$3.68M-$0.31N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.6% of Aureus Greenway shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gambling.com Group has a consensus target price of $7.13, indicating a potential upside of 278.99%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Aureus Greenway.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -27.44% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway-167.57% -17.49% -16.56%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 6 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 0 mentions for Gambling.com Group. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway Neutral
Gambling.com Group Neutral

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Aureus Greenway on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Cineverse?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.13, indicating a potential upside of 278.99%. Cineverse has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 232.10%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Cineverse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Neutral
Cineverse Neutral

Cineverse has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Cineverse -13.44%-45.60%-19.83%

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Cineverse has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Cineverse$65.73M0.97-$8.84M-$0.52N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Cineverse on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Gaia?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Gaia (NASDAQ:GAIA) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaia has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Gaia shares are held by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Gaia shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gaia had 1 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gaia and 0 mentions for Gambling.com Group. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gaia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Neutral
Gaia Neutral

Gaia has a net margin of -4.76% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Gaia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Gaia -4.76%-4.62%-3.06%

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.13, suggesting a potential upside of 278.99%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Gaia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Gaia
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Gaia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Gaia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Gaia$98.95M0.49-$4.49M-$0.19N/A

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Gaia on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gambling.com Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GAMB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GAMB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GAMB vs. The Competition

MetricGambling.com GroupMedia IndustryCommunication Services SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$65.98M$3.12B$33.93B$12.76B
Dividend YieldN/A5.34%5.32%10.01%
P/E Ratio-1.4627.5618.1325.53
Price / Sales0.4027.1861.4792.32
Price / Cash0.9819.8019.6549.39
Price / Book0.617.9111.006.11
Net Income-$32.93M-$30.65M$1.11B$347.58M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.76%1.41%4.91%
1 Month Performance-6.00%-2.21%0.36%-2.06%
1 Year Performance-81.44%20.45%6.03%21.03%

Gambling.com Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
3.8348 of 5 stars
$1.88
+2.2%
$7.13
+279.0%
-81.7%$65.98M$165.25MN/A230
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.3408 of 5 stars
$2.48
+1.4%
$6.00
+142.4%
-46.7%$145.96M$71.73MN/A90
SEAT
Vivid Seats
0.875 of 5 stars
$7.94
+2.8%
$9.43
+18.8%
-63.7%$86.59M$570.78MN/A430
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.2267 of 5 stars
$2.77
-15.5%
N/A+10.5%$59.83M$2.96MN/A40
CNVS
Cineverse
2.9029 of 5 stars
$2.45
-2.4%
$9.00
+267.5%
-49.1%$57.26M$65.73MN/A134

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GAMB) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners