Go Pro

Gambling.com Group (GAMB) Competitors

Gambling.com Group logo
$1.93 +0.07 (+3.76%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.91 -0.02 (-1.04%)
As of 07:33 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GAMB vs. CURI, PUSA, SEAT, CNVS, and AHMA

Should you buy Gambling.com Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gambling.com Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gambling.com Group include CuriosityStream (CURI), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Cineverse (CNVS), and Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to CuriosityStream?

CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

CuriosityStream has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gambling.com Group. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CuriosityStream$71.66M2.15-$6.43M-$0.13N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.41-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

CuriosityStream has a net margin of -11.26% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CuriosityStream-11.26% -18.46% -10.83%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CuriosityStream has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CuriosityStream and CuriosityStream both had 4 articles in the media. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat CuriosityStream's score of 0.48 indicating that Gambling.com Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CuriosityStream
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gambling.com Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CuriosityStream currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 129.89%. Gambling.com Group has a consensus target price of $7.38, indicating a potential upside of 282.12%. Given Gambling.com Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than CuriosityStream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats CuriosityStream on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Aureus Greenway has a beta of 4.86, indicating that its share price is 386% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Gambling.com Group has a consensus target price of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 282.12%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Aureus Greenway.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Aureus Greenway has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gambling.com Group. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway$2.96M26.78-$3.68M-$0.31N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.41-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.6% of Aureus Greenway shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 3 more articles in the media than Aureus Greenway. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Aureus Greenway. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.61 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway Positive
Gambling.com Group Positive

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -27.44% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway-167.57% -17.49% -16.56%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Aureus Greenway on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Gambling.com Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Gambling.com Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.15-$429.30M-$69.61N/A
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.41-$32.93M-$1.29N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 2 more articles in the media than Vivid Seats. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 2 mentions for Vivid Seats. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.61 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gambling.com Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gambling.com Group has a net margin of -27.44% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Gambling.com Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-82.25% 68.65% 5.92%
Gambling.com Group -27.44%27.61%11.20%

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus target price of $9.43, suggesting a potential upside of 21.88%. Gambling.com Group has a consensus target price of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 282.12%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Vivid Seats on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Cineverse?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Cineverse has a net margin of -13.44% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Cineverse -13.44%-45.60%-19.83%

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus target price of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 282.12%. Cineverse has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 246.15%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Cineverse.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 3 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.61 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Positive
Cineverse Very Positive

Cineverse has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.41-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Cineverse$65.73M0.93-$8.84M-$0.52N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Cineverse on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gambling.com Group compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (NASDAQ:AHMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C N/A N/A N/A

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.41-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C$20.23M2.61$1.22MN/AN/A

Gambling.com Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 282.12%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 3 more articles in the media than Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C. Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.61 indicating that Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Positive
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C Very Positive

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gambling.com Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GAMB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GAMB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GAMB vs. The Competition

MetricGambling.com GroupADVERTISING/MKTG SVCS IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$65.28M$2.15B$6.82B$12.56B
Dividend YieldN/A3.85%3.11%9.46%
P/E Ratio-1.5030.1528.5124.35
Price / Sales0.4183.17351.2576.72
Price / Cash0.9912.7723.2860.00
Price / Book0.6316.205.736.31
Net Income-$32.93M$17.67M$202.53M$331.55M
7 Day Performance-2.03%-7.58%-0.37%0.15%
1 Month Performance-20.58%-9.59%-2.61%-0.68%
1 Year Performance-83.28%200.52%15.22%20.73%

Gambling.com Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
4.8384 of 5 stars
$1.93
+3.8%
$7.38
+282.1%
-84.1%$65.28M$165.45MN/A230
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.6429 of 5 stars
$2.81
-0.5%
$6.00
+113.9%
-40.7%$165.12M$71.66MN/A90
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.2248 of 5 stars
$3.58
-9.1%
N/A+511.6%$77.33M$2.96MN/A40
SEAT
Vivid Seats
1.8121 of 5 stars
$6.75
-0.3%
$9.43
+39.8%
-77.4%$72.70M$570.78MN/A430
CNVS
Cineverse
3.2382 of 5 stars
$2.93
+1.9%
$9.00
+207.7%
-59.2%$68.15M$65.73MN/A134

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GAMB) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners