Madison Square Garden Entertainment Competitors

Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) and Madison Square Garden Entertainment (NYSE:MSGE) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Churchill Downs and Madison Square Garden Entertainment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Churchill Downs presently has a consensus target price of $200.80, indicating a potential downside of 4.82%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a consensus target price of $99.1429, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Madison Square Garden Entertainment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more favorable than Churchill Downs.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Churchill Downs and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Churchill Downs has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Churchill Downs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Churchill Downs and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Madison Square Garden Entertainment on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Under Armour (NYSE:UA) and Madison Square Garden Entertainment (NYSE:MSGE) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Under Armour and Madison Square Garden Entertainment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Under Armour presently has a consensus target price of $14.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.49%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a consensus target price of $99.1429, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Madison Square Garden Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more favorable than Under Armour.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.2% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Under Armour shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Under Armour and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Under Armour has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares Under Armour and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Entertainment beats Under Armour on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hyatt Hotels (NYSE:H) and Madison Square Garden Entertainment (NYSE:MSGE) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hyatt Hotels and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hyatt Hotels has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hyatt Hotels, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Hyatt Hotels and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

36.8% of Hyatt Hotels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.8% of Hyatt Hotels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Hyatt Hotels and Madison Square Garden Entertainment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Hyatt Hotels presently has a consensus target price of $58.6471, indicating a potential downside of 26.58%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a consensus target price of $99.1429, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Madison Square Garden Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more favorable than Hyatt Hotels.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Entertainment beats Hyatt Hotels on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Madison Square Garden Entertainment (NYSE:MSGE) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

95.4% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.8% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Brunswick and Madison Square Garden Entertainment, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Brunswick currently has a consensus price target of $89.6154, indicating a potential downside of 12.25%. Madison Square Garden Entertainment has a consensus price target of $99.1429, indicating a potential upside of 16.35%. Given Madison Square Garden Entertainment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more favorable than Brunswick.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brunswick and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brunswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Brunswick and Madison Square Garden Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Brunswick beats Madison Square Garden Entertainment on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment (NYSE:MSGE) and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (NYSE:TV) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.8% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Madison Square Garden Entertainment and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B., as provided by MarketBeat.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $99.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. has a consensus price target of $11.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.97%. Given Madison Square Garden Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more favorable than Grupo Televisa, S.A.B..

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Madison Square Garden Entertainment and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Televisa, S.A.B., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Entertainment and Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Entertainment beats Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment (NYSE:MSGE) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.8% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.4% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of Madison Square Garden Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of Planet Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Madison Square Garden Entertainment and Planet Fitness, as provided by MarketBeat.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $99.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 16.35%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $76.1875, suggesting a potential downside of 9.37%. Given Madison Square Garden Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Madison Square Garden Entertainment is more favorable than Planet Fitness.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Madison Square Garden Entertainment and Planet Fitness' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Planet Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Entertainment and Planet Fitness' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Madison Square Garden Entertainment on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.