Free Trial

OneSpaWorld (OSW) Competitors

OneSpaWorld logo
$23.30 +0.02 (+0.09%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$23.23 -0.07 (-0.30%)
As of 05:05 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

OSW vs. VIK, HRB, FTDR, ADT, and BFAM

Should you buy OneSpaWorld stock or one of its competitors? OneSpaWorld's main competitors and comparable companies include Viking (VIK), H&R Block (HRB), Frontdoor (FTDR), ADT (ADT), and Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Viking?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Viking (NYSE:VIK) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Viking has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Viking is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.46$71.62M$0.7929.47
Viking$6.97B5.22$1.15B$3.0127.11

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Viking shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Viking had 12 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Viking and 1 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Viking's score of 0.20 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Viking
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viking has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Viking has a net margin of 19.33% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. Viking's return on equity of 117.98% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
Viking 19.33%117.98%10.80%

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus target price of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.24%. Viking has a consensus target price of $106.83, suggesting a potential upside of 30.92%. Given OneSpaWorld's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Viking.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Viking
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Summary

Viking beats OneSpaWorld on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to H&R Block?

H&R Block (NYSE:HRB) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

H&R Block has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. H&R Block is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H&R Block$3.95B1.32$733.60M$5.727.46
OneSpaWorld$961M2.46$71.62M$0.7929.47

H&R Block currently has a consensus price target of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 9.39%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus price target of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.24%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than H&R Block.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
H&R Block
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

H&R Block has a net margin of 18.59% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.36% beat H&R Block's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
H&R Block18.59% -214.84% 22.56%
OneSpaWorld 8.02%18.36%14.28%

H&R Block has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

90.1% of H&R Block shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of H&R Block shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

H&R Block pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. H&R Block pays out 32.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. OneSpaWorld pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H&R Block has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. H&R Block is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, H&R Block had 5 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for H&R Block and 1 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat H&R Block's score of 0.03 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
H&R Block
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
OneSpaWorld
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats H&R Block on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Frontdoor?

Frontdoor (NASDAQ:FTDR) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Frontdoor had 2 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Frontdoor and 1 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Frontdoor's score of 0.38 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frontdoor
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
OneSpaWorld
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Frontdoor has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Frontdoor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontdoor$2.09B2.59$255M$3.7720.89
OneSpaWorld$961M2.46$71.62M$0.7929.47

Frontdoor presently has a consensus target price of $92.60, suggesting a potential upside of 17.56%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus target price of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.24%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Frontdoor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontdoor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Frontdoor has a net margin of 12.72% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. Frontdoor's return on equity of 120.90% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontdoor12.72% 120.90% 14.86%
OneSpaWorld 8.02%18.36%14.28%

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Frontdoor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontdoor has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Frontdoor beats OneSpaWorld on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to ADT?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and ADT (NYSE:ADT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

ADT has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. ADT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.46$71.62M$0.7929.47
ADT$5.13B0.91$595.95M$0.718.97

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus price target of $31.25, indicating a potential upside of 34.24%. ADT has a consensus price target of $8.23, indicating a potential upside of 29.26%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than ADT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
ADT
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. ADT pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. OneSpaWorld pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ADT pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ADT has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. ADT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ADT has a net margin of 11.85% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. ADT's return on equity of 18.99% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
ADT 11.85%18.99%4.40%

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ADT has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of ADT shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of ADT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ADT had 4 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for ADT and 1 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat ADT's score of 0.40 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ADT
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats ADT on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Bright Horizons Family Solutions?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Bright Horizons Family Solutions (NYSE:BFAM) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Bright Horizons Family Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bright Horizons Family Solutions has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Bright Horizons Family Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Bright Horizons Family Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.46$71.62M$0.7929.47
Bright Horizons Family Solutions$2.93B1.10$193.12M$3.1621.01

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 8.02% compared to Bright Horizons Family Solutions' net margin of 5.78%. Bright Horizons Family Solutions' return on equity of 20.09% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
Bright Horizons Family Solutions 5.78%20.09%6.35%

In the previous week, Bright Horizons Family Solutions had 5 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Bright Horizons Family Solutions and 1 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Bright Horizons Family Solutions' score of 0.33 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus price target of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.24%. Bright Horizons Family Solutions has a consensus price target of $93.50, suggesting a potential upside of 40.80%. Given Bright Horizons Family Solutions' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bright Horizons Family Solutions is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Bright Horizons Family Solutions on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get OneSpaWorld News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OSW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSW vs. The Competition

MetricOneSpaWorldDiversified Consumer Services IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.36B$4.21B$12.38B$13.38B
Dividend Yield0.87%2.95%73.14%17.39%
P/E Ratio29.499.9544.8226.14
Price / Sales2.4634.5384.46107.42
Price / Cash19.5913.5328.2253.24
Price / Book4.362.983.946.28
Net Income$71.62M$241.17M$444.34M$382.03M
7 Day Performance3.60%0.47%-0.53%-0.89%
1 Month Performance4.02%-2.78%-5.04%-5.32%
1 Year Performance10.01%-7.07%-6.61%0.76%

OneSpaWorld Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSW
OneSpaWorld
4.2895 of 5 stars
$23.30
+0.1%
$31.25
+34.1%
+11.4%$2.36B$961M29.495,395
VIK
Viking
4.7989 of 5 stars
$79.91
+0.8%
$106.83
+33.7%
+36.5%$35.61B$6.50B26.5413,000
HRB
H&R Block
3.8185 of 5 stars
$40.73
+1.0%
$46.67
+14.6%
-16.2%$5.17B$3.95B7.134,600
FTDR
Frontdoor
3.3777 of 5 stars
$72.08
-1.2%
$92.60
+28.5%
+17.3%$5.02B$2.09B19.342,034
ADT
ADT
4.6582 of 5 stars
$6.19
-0.1%
$8.23
+33.1%
-26.9%$4.52B$5.13B8.7112,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:OSW) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners