OneSpaWorld (OSW) Competitors

OneSpaWorld logo
$28.20 +0.94 (+3.45%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$28.20 0.00 (-0.02%)
As of 05:53 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

OSW vs. VIK, MSGS, LTH, RSI, and SGHC

Should you buy OneSpaWorld stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares OneSpaWorld with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with OneSpaWorld include Viking (VIK), Madison Square Garden (MSGS), Life Time Group (LTH), Rush Street Interactive (RSI), and Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Viking?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Viking (NYSE:VIK) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Viking shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus price target of $29.20, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Viking has a consensus price target of $96.38, indicating a potential downside of 7.01%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Viking.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Viking
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Viking had 44 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 47 mentions for Viking and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Viking's score of 0.32 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Viking
9 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
28 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Viking has a net margin of 18.00% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 7.85%. Viking's return on equity of 149.40% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld7.85% 18.00% 13.77%
Viking 18.00%149.40%10.16%

Viking has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.98$71.62M$0.7537.60
Viking$6.50B7.10$1.15B$2.6938.53

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viking has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Viking beats OneSpaWorld on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Madison Square Garden?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Madison Square Garden (NYSE:MSGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

OneSpaWorld has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.98$71.62M$0.7537.60
Madison Square Garden$1.04B9.10-$22.44M-$0.93N/A

In the previous week, OneSpaWorld had 2 more articles in the media than Madison Square Garden. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld and 1 mentions for Madison Square Garden. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Madison Square Garden's score of 0.50 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld Positive
Madison Square Garden Positive

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus target price of $29.20, suggesting a potential upside of 3.55%. Madison Square Garden has a consensus target price of $357.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.10%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Madison Square Garden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Madison Square Garden
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Madison Square Garden shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Madison Square Garden shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Madison Square Garden's net margin of -2.07%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Madison Square Garden's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld7.85% 18.00% 13.77%
Madison Square Garden -2.07%N/A -1.39%

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Madison Square Garden on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Life Time Group?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Life Time Group (NYSE:LTH) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

OneSpaWorld currently has a consensus target price of $29.20, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Life Time Group has a consensus target price of $43.09, indicating a potential upside of 5.04%. Given Life Time Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Life Time Group is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Life Time Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Life Time Group has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Life Time Group had 5 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Life Time Group and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Life Time Group's score of 0.60 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Life Time Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Life Time Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Life Time Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Life Time Group has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Life Time Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.98$71.62M$0.7537.60
Life Time Group$3.00B3.05$373.67M$1.7123.99

Life Time Group has a net margin of 12.56% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 7.85%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Life Time Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld7.85% 18.00% 13.77%
Life Time Group 12.56%10.10%3.91%

Summary

Life Time Group beats OneSpaWorld on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Rush Street Interactive?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Rush Street Interactive had 2 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Rush Street Interactive and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Rush Street Interactive's score of 0.32 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rush Street Interactive
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Rush Street Interactive's net margin of 2.98%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld7.85% 18.00% 13.77%
Rush Street Interactive 2.98%17.21%8.00%

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus target price of $29.20, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Rush Street Interactive has a consensus target price of $29.25, indicating a potential downside of 7.36%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Rush Street Interactive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Rush Street Interactive
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

OneSpaWorld has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rush Street Interactive. OneSpaWorld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Street Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.98$71.62M$0.7537.60
Rush Street Interactive$1.13B6.48$33.31M$0.31101.85

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Rush Street Interactive on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Super Group (SGHC) (NYSE:SGHC) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

5.1% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Super Group (SGHC) has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Super Group (SGHC) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Super Group (SGHC)$2.23B3.14$217M$0.4828.83
OneSpaWorld$961M2.98$71.62M$0.7537.60

Super Group (SGHC) presently has a consensus price target of $17.57, suggesting a potential upside of 27.00%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus price target of $29.20, suggesting a potential upside of 3.55%. Given Super Group (SGHC)'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Super Group (SGHC) is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Super Group (SGHC)
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, OneSpaWorld had 2 more articles in the media than Super Group (SGHC). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld and 1 mentions for Super Group (SGHC). Super Group (SGHC)'s average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat OneSpaWorld's score of 0.95 indicating that Super Group (SGHC) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Super Group (SGHC)
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Super Group (SGHC) has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Super Group (SGHC) pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Super Group (SGHC) pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. OneSpaWorld pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Super Group (SGHC) has a net margin of 10.58% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 7.85%. Super Group (SGHC)'s return on equity of 42.85% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Super Group (SGHC)10.58% 42.85% 26.15%
OneSpaWorld 7.85%18.00%13.77%

Summary

Super Group (SGHC) beats OneSpaWorld on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get OneSpaWorld News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OSW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSW vs. The Competition

MetricOneSpaWorldLEISURE&REC SVS IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.86B$9.23B$7.22B$12.17B
Dividend Yield0.72%2.45%3.07%5.90%
P/E Ratio37.6018.5720.7724.20
Price / Sales2.9811.994.0082.79
Price / Cash23.6112.0815.3153.91
Price / Book5.275.093.786.37
Net Income$71.62M$362.25M$247.00M$337.69M
7 Day Performance2.43%-0.53%-0.30%-0.30%
1 Month Performance16.00%10.09%0.62%0.36%
1 Year Performance37.63%34.95%4.42%26.94%

OneSpaWorld Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSW
OneSpaWorld
3.6334 of 5 stars
$28.20
+3.4%
$29.20
+3.5%
+38.9%$2.86B$961M37.605,395
VIK
Viking
3.0972 of 5 stars
$100.06
+3.0%
$96.38
-3.7%
+100.3%$43.31B$6.50B37.2013,000
MSGS
Madison Square Garden
1.3613 of 5 stars
$370.37
+0.1%
$356.80
-3.7%
+83.6%$8.91B$1.04BN/A1,007
LTH
Life Time Group
3.6752 of 5 stars
$37.37
+1.2%
$40.80
+9.2%
+36.5%$8.22B$3.00B21.8544,000
RSI
Rush Street Interactive
1.9011 of 5 stars
$30.48
+4.8%
$29.25
-4.0%
+109.6%$6.77B$1.13B98.33470

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:OSW) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners