Free Trial

OneSpaWorld (OSW) Competitors

OneSpaWorld logo
$23.53 -0.29 (-1.22%)
Closing price 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$23.52 -0.01 (-0.04%)
As of 05/15/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

OSW vs. MSGS, RSI, SGHC, LTH, and PLNT

Should you buy OneSpaWorld stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares OneSpaWorld with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with OneSpaWorld include Madison Square Garden (MSGS), Rush Street Interactive (RSI), Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC), Life Time Group (LTH), and Planet Fitness (PLNT). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Madison Square Garden?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Madison Square Garden (NYSE:MSGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

OneSpaWorld has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.48$71.62M$0.7531.37
Madison Square Garden$1.04B8.14-$22.44M-$0.93N/A

OneSpaWorld currently has a consensus target price of $27.60, suggesting a potential upside of 17.30%. Madison Square Garden has a consensus target price of $342.20, suggesting a potential downside of 2.60%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Madison Square Garden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Madison Square Garden
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Madison Square Garden had 10 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Madison Square Garden and 2 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Madison Square Garden's score of 0.04 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Madison Square Garden
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Madison Square Garden's net margin of -2.07%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Madison Square Garden's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld7.85% 18.00% 13.77%
Madison Square Garden -2.07%N/A -1.39%

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Madison Square Garden shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Madison Square Garden shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Madison Square Garden on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Rush Street Interactive?

Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Rush Street Interactive's net margin of 2.98%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Rush Street Interactive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rush Street Interactive2.98% 17.21% 8.00%
OneSpaWorld 7.85%18.00%13.77%

OneSpaWorld has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rush Street Interactive. OneSpaWorld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Street Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rush Street Interactive$1.13B5.48$33.31M$0.3186.12
OneSpaWorld$961M2.48$71.62M$0.7531.37

24.8% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 52.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rush Street Interactive presently has a consensus target price of $28.63, indicating a potential upside of 7.23%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus target price of $27.60, indicating a potential upside of 17.30%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Rush Street Interactive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rush Street Interactive
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Rush Street Interactive had 7 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Rush Street Interactive and 2 mentions for OneSpaWorld. Rush Street Interactive's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat OneSpaWorld's score of 0.74 indicating that Rush Street Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rush Street Interactive
4 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Rush Street Interactive and OneSpaWorld tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Super Group (SGHC) (NYSE:SGHC) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Super Group (SGHC) has a net margin of 10.58% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 7.85%. Super Group (SGHC)'s return on equity of 42.85% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Super Group (SGHC)10.58% 42.85% 26.15%
OneSpaWorld 7.85%18.00%13.77%

Super Group (SGHC) has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Super Group (SGHC) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Super Group (SGHC)$2.23B2.98$217M$0.4827.38
OneSpaWorld$961M2.48$71.62M$0.7531.37

Super Group (SGHC) has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Super Group (SGHC) pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Super Group (SGHC) pays out 41.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. OneSpaWorld pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.1% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Super Group (SGHC) had 18 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Super Group (SGHC) and 2 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Super Group (SGHC)'s score of 0.57 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Super Group (SGHC)
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Super Group (SGHC) presently has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.43%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus target price of $27.60, indicating a potential upside of 17.30%. Given Super Group (SGHC)'s higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Super Group (SGHC) is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Super Group (SGHC)
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Super Group (SGHC) beats OneSpaWorld on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Life Time Group?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Life Time Group (NYSE:LTH) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

OneSpaWorld currently has a consensus target price of $27.60, indicating a potential upside of 17.30%. Life Time Group has a consensus target price of $40.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.12%. Given Life Time Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Life Time Group is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Life Time Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Life Time Group has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Life Time Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.48$71.62M$0.7531.37
Life Time Group$3.00B2.51$373.67M$1.7119.72

Life Time Group has a net margin of 12.56% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 7.85%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Life Time Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld7.85% 18.00% 13.77%
Life Time Group 12.56%10.10%3.91%

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Life Time Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Life Time Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Life Time Group had 23 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Life Time Group and 2 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Life Time Group's score of 0.31 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Life Time Group
8 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Life Time Group has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Life Time Group beats OneSpaWorld on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Planet Fitness?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Planet Fitness currently has a consensus target price of $78.62, suggesting a potential upside of 49.43%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus target price of $27.60, suggesting a potential upside of 17.30%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.16$219.10M$2.7718.99
OneSpaWorld$961M2.48$71.62M$0.7531.37

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 7.85%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.00% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Fitness16.52% -81.29% 8.66%
OneSpaWorld 7.85%18.00%13.77%

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 23 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Planet Fitness and 2 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.50 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness
6 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OneSpaWorld
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats OneSpaWorld on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get OneSpaWorld News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OSW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSW vs. The Competition

MetricOneSpaWorldLEISURE&REC SVS IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.42B$8.01B$7.10B$12.47B
Dividend Yield0.84%2.42%2.94%5.28%
P/E Ratio31.3715.2117.6925.24
Price / Sales2.487.183.5878.31
Price / Cash20.3610.3214.6356.04
Price / Book4.254.523.626.91
Net Income$71.62M$420.73M$246.24M$334.11M
7 Day Performance-5.20%-1.74%-0.26%0.01%
1 Month Performance-2.28%-3.35%10.32%1.17%
1 Year Performance21.85%19.34%13.10%30.68%

OneSpaWorld Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSW
OneSpaWorld
3.8941 of 5 stars
$23.53
-1.2%
$27.60
+17.3%
+21.9%$2.42B$961M31.375,395
MSGS
Madison Square Garden
1.4676 of 5 stars
$339.63
-0.3%
$333.80
-1.7%
+78.5%$8.20B$1.04BN/A1,007
RSI
Rush Street Interactive
3.1711 of 5 stars
$27.76
-2.0%
$28.63
+3.1%
+119.9%$6.58B$1.13B89.54470
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC)
4.3522 of 5 stars
$12.90
+0.1%
$16.75
+29.9%
+52.0%$6.52B$2.23B29.792,900
LTH
Life Time Group
3.6043 of 5 stars
$26.20
-1.8%
$40.13
+53.2%
+17.5%$5.92B$3.00B15.7844,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:OSW) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners