Go Pro

OneSpaWorld (OSW) Competitors

OneSpaWorld logo
$26.21 -0.32 (-1.21%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$26.20 -0.01 (-0.02%)
As of 04:15 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

OSW vs. VIK, ADT, HRB, FTDR, and BFAM

Should you buy OneSpaWorld stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares OneSpaWorld with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with OneSpaWorld include Viking (VIK), ADT (ADT), H&R Block (HRB), Frontdoor (FTDR), and Bright Horizons Family Solutions (BFAM). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Viking?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Viking (NYSE:VIK) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Viking shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Viking had 24 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Viking and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Viking's score of 0.85 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Viking
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus price target of $30.60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.75%. Viking has a consensus price target of $105.11, suggesting a potential downside of 0.48%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Viking.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Viking
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79

Viking has a net margin of 18.00% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. Viking's return on equity of 149.40% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
Viking 18.00%149.40%10.16%

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Viking has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Viking has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Viking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.77$71.62M$0.7933.18
Viking$6.50B7.24$1.15B$2.6939.26

Summary

Viking beats OneSpaWorld on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to ADT?

ADT (NYSE:ADT) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

ADT presently has a consensus price target of $8.23, suggesting a potential upside of 7.79%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus price target of $30.60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.75%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than ADT.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ADT
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ADT has a net margin of 11.85% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. ADT's return on equity of 18.99% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ADT11.85% 18.99% 4.40%
OneSpaWorld 8.02%18.36%14.28%

ADT has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. ADT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ADT$5.13B1.09$595.95M$0.7110.75
OneSpaWorld$961M2.77$71.62M$0.7933.18

ADT has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

ADT pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. ADT pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. OneSpaWorld pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ADT has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. ADT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

87.2% of ADT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of ADT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ADT had 10 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for ADT and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. ADT's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat OneSpaWorld's score of 1.14 indicating that ADT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ADT
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OneSpaWorld
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats ADT on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to H&R Block?

H&R Block (NYSE:HRB) and OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, H&R Block had 5 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for H&R Block and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat H&R Block's score of 0.48 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
H&R Block
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
OneSpaWorld
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

H&R Block currently has a consensus price target of $43.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.76%. OneSpaWorld has a consensus price target of $30.60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.75%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than H&R Block.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
H&R Block
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

H&R Block has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. H&R Block is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H&R Block$3.91B1.49$605.77M$5.628.21
OneSpaWorld$961M2.77$71.62M$0.7933.18

H&R Block has a net margin of 18.90% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. OneSpaWorld's return on equity of 18.36% beat H&R Block's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
H&R Block18.90% -211.62% 22.70%
OneSpaWorld 8.02%18.36%14.28%

H&R Block has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

90.1% of H&R Block shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of H&R Block shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

H&R Block pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. OneSpaWorld pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. H&R Block pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. OneSpaWorld pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H&R Block has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. H&R Block is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats H&R Block on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Frontdoor?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Frontdoor (NASDAQ:FTDR) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus price target of $30.60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.75%. Frontdoor has a consensus price target of $92.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.29%. Given OneSpaWorld's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe OneSpaWorld is more favorable than Frontdoor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Frontdoor
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Frontdoor had 18 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Frontdoor and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. OneSpaWorld's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Frontdoor's score of 0.85 indicating that OneSpaWorld is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Frontdoor
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Frontdoor shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontdoor has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Frontdoor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.77$71.62M$0.7933.18
Frontdoor$2.09B3.05$255M$3.4926.03

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frontdoor has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Frontdoor has a net margin of 12.22% compared to OneSpaWorld's net margin of 8.02%. Frontdoor's return on equity of 118.62% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
Frontdoor 12.22%118.62%14.20%

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Frontdoor on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does OneSpaWorld compare to Bright Horizons Family Solutions?

OneSpaWorld (NASDAQ:OSW) and Bright Horizons Family Solutions (NYSE:BFAM) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

OneSpaWorld has a net margin of 8.02% compared to Bright Horizons Family Solutions' net margin of 5.78%. Bright Horizons Family Solutions' return on equity of 20.09% beat OneSpaWorld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OneSpaWorld8.02% 18.36% 14.28%
Bright Horizons Family Solutions 5.78%20.09%6.35%

OneSpaWorld presently has a consensus price target of $30.60, suggesting a potential upside of 16.75%. Bright Horizons Family Solutions has a consensus price target of $95.88, suggesting a potential upside of 30.59%. Given Bright Horizons Family Solutions' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bright Horizons Family Solutions is more favorable than OneSpaWorld.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OneSpaWorld
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

In the previous week, Bright Horizons Family Solutions had 10 more articles in the media than OneSpaWorld. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Bright Horizons Family Solutions and 3 mentions for OneSpaWorld. Bright Horizons Family Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat OneSpaWorld's score of 1.14 indicating that Bright Horizons Family Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OneSpaWorld
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.0% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of OneSpaWorld shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Bright Horizons Family Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bright Horizons Family Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than OneSpaWorld. Bright Horizons Family Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OneSpaWorld, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OneSpaWorld$961M2.77$71.62M$0.7933.18
Bright Horizons Family Solutions$2.93B1.32$193.12M$3.1623.23

OneSpaWorld has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bright Horizons Family Solutions has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

OneSpaWorld beats Bright Horizons Family Solutions on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get OneSpaWorld News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for OSW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding OSW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

OSW vs. The Competition

MetricOneSpaWorldDiversified Consumer Services IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.66B$4.41B$13.40B$12.99B
Dividend Yield0.75%2.80%53.19%9.93%
P/E Ratio33.1812.8548.0826.03
Price / Sales2.7720.8791.13111.63
Price / Cash22.7514.7226.4350.37
Price / Book4.573.604.596.24
Net Income$71.62M$239.18M$443.86M$342.57M
7 Day Performance1.75%1.57%2.02%4.33%
1 Month Performance-4.03%-1.16%2.13%-1.02%
1 Year Performance20.73%1.04%3.26%22.54%

OneSpaWorld Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
OSW
OneSpaWorld
4.1141 of 5 stars
$26.21
-1.2%
$30.60
+16.7%
+17.9%$2.66B$961M33.185,395
VIK
Viking
4.276 of 5 stars
$106.28
+1.8%
$104.06
-2.1%
+85.0%$46.51B$6.50B39.5113,000
ADT
ADT
3.5424 of 5 stars
$7.90
+3.3%
$8.23
+4.2%
-10.6%$5.60B$5.13B11.1212,200
HRB
H&R Block
4.0464 of 5 stars
$45.20
+2.7%
$43.00
-4.9%
-16.3%$5.58B$3.91B8.044,300
FTDR
Frontdoor
2.7829 of 5 stars
$75.99
+4.6%
$74.75
-1.6%
+58.0%$5.10B$2.09B21.772,034

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:OSW) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners