NYSE:FUN

Cedar Fair Competitors

$48.07
-1.56 (-3.14 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$48.02
Now: $48.07
$49.63
50-Day Range
$46.48
MA: $49.55
$52.17
52-Week Range
$19.50
Now: $48.07
$52.50
Volume385,442 shs
Average Volume473,345 shs
Market Capitalization$2.73 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.22

Competitors

Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) Vs. MSGS, SIX, SEAS, IGT, RSI, and EVRI

Should you be buying FUN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "miscellaneous amusement & recreation services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Cedar Fair, including Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS), Six Flags Entertainment (SIX), SeaWorld Entertainment (SEAS), International Game Technology (IGT), Rush Street Interactive (RSI), and Everi (EVRI).

Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) and Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Cedar Fair's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Madison Square Garden SportsN/A-2.36%-1.05%
Cedar Fair-119.04%N/A-14.59%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Cedar Fair's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden Sports$603.32 million7.28$-182,390,000.00($4.86)-37.45
Cedar Fair$1.47 billion1.85$172.37 million$3.0815.61

Cedar Fair has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cedar Fair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Madison Square Garden Sports and Cedar Fair, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Madison Square Garden Sports01902.90
Cedar Fair02802.80

Madison Square Garden Sports currently has a consensus price target of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 13.11%. Cedar Fair has a consensus price target of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than Cedar Fair.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Sports beats Cedar Fair on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Six Flags Entertainment (NYSE:SIX) and Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Six Flags Entertainment and Cedar Fair's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Six Flags Entertainment$1.49 billion2.66$179.07 million$2.2420.68
Cedar Fair$1.47 billion1.85$172.37 million$3.0815.61

Six Flags Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Cedar Fair. Cedar Fair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Six Flags Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 2.45, meaning that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Six Flags Entertainment and Cedar Fair, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Six Flags Entertainment06702.54
Cedar Fair02802.80

Six Flags Entertainment currently has a consensus price target of $34.8462, indicating a potential downside of 24.77%. Cedar Fair has a consensus price target of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. Given Cedar Fair's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cedar Fair is more favorable than Six Flags Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares Six Flags Entertainment and Cedar Fair's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Six Flags Entertainment-68.52%N/A-11.82%
Cedar Fair-119.04%N/A-14.59%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.9% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Six Flags Entertainment beats Cedar Fair on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) and SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cedar Fair and SeaWorld Entertainment's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cedar Fair$1.47 billion1.85$172.37 million$3.0815.61
SeaWorld Entertainment$1.40 billion2.82$89.48 million$1.5831.74

Cedar Fair has higher revenue and earnings than SeaWorld Entertainment. Cedar Fair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SeaWorld Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cedar Fair and SeaWorld Entertainment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cedar Fair02802.80
SeaWorld Entertainment04702.64

Cedar Fair presently has a consensus target price of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. SeaWorld Entertainment has a consensus target price of $40.2143, indicating a potential downside of 19.81%. Given Cedar Fair's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cedar Fair is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares Cedar Fair and SeaWorld Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cedar Fair-119.04%N/A-14.59%
SeaWorld Entertainment-50.54%-352.53%-10.24%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cedar Fair beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) and International Game Technology (NYSE:IGT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cedar Fair and International Game Technology's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cedar Fair$1.47 billion1.85$172.37 million$3.0815.61
International Game Technology$4.79 billion0.70$-19,020,000.00$1.0815.07

Cedar Fair has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Game Technology. International Game Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cedar Fair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Game Technology has a beta of 2.34, indicating that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cedar Fair and International Game Technology, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cedar Fair02802.80
International Game Technology04602.60

Cedar Fair presently has a consensus target price of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. International Game Technology has a consensus target price of $18.2750, indicating a potential upside of 12.25%. Given International Game Technology's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe International Game Technology is more favorable than Cedar Fair.

Profitability

This table compares Cedar Fair and International Game Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cedar Fair-119.04%N/A-14.59%
International Game Technology-21.60%0.59%0.09%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of International Game Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) and Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cedar Fair and Rush Street Interactive's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cedar Fair$1.47 billion1.85$172.37 million$3.0815.61
Rush Street InteractiveN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Cedar Fair has higher revenue and earnings than Rush Street Interactive.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cedar Fair and Rush Street Interactive, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cedar Fair02802.80
Rush Street Interactive01402.80

Cedar Fair presently has a consensus target price of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. Rush Street Interactive has a consensus target price of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 89.19%. Given Rush Street Interactive's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rush Street Interactive is more favorable than Cedar Fair.

Profitability

This table compares Cedar Fair and Rush Street Interactive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cedar Fair-119.04%N/A-14.59%
Rush Street InteractiveN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cedar Fair beats Rush Street Interactive on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) and Everi (NYSE:EVRI) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cedar Fair and Everi's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cedar Fair$1.47 billion1.85$172.37 million$3.0815.61
Everi$533.23 million2.32$16.52 million$0.2850.93

Cedar Fair has higher revenue and earnings than Everi. Cedar Fair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Everi has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cedar Fair and Everi, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cedar Fair02802.80
Everi00713.13

Cedar Fair presently has a consensus target price of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. Everi has a consensus target price of $17.75, indicating a potential upside of 24.47%. Given Everi's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Everi is more favorable than Cedar Fair.

Profitability

This table compares Cedar Fair and Everi's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cedar Fair-119.04%N/A-14.59%
Everi-21.25%-474.12%-5.18%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Everi shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Everi shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Everi beats Cedar Fair on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Cedar Fair Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Madison Square Garden Sports logo
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports
1.4$182.03-1.0%$4.39 billion$603.32 million-33.46Decrease in Short Interest
Six Flags Entertainment logo
SIX
Six Flags Entertainment
1.5$46.32-1.2%$3.95 billion$1.49 billion-11.24
SeaWorld Entertainment logo
SEAS
SeaWorld Entertainment
1.4$50.15-0.4%$3.94 billion$1.40 billion-13.48Insider Selling
News Coverage
International Game Technology logo
IGT
International Game Technology
1.0$16.28-2.1%$3.34 billion$4.79 billion-4.05Decrease in Short Interest
Rush Street Interactive logo
RSI
Rush Street Interactive
1.5$14.80-4.1%$3.15 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Everi logo
EVRI
Everi
1.7$14.26-2.4%$1.24 billion$533.23 million-13.98
Golden Entertainment logo
GDEN
Golden Entertainment
1.2$28.23-2.1%$794.93 million$973.41 million-6.27
500.com logo
WBAI
500.com
0.5$18.04-3.3%$775.18 million$5.70 million-10.37
HOFV
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment
1.5$3.76-7.2%$293.01 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
WORX
SCWorx
0.6$1.92-2.6%$18.94 million$5.55 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.