Planet Fitness (PLNT) Competitors

Planet Fitness logo
$51.89 +0.83 (+1.63%)
As of 03:58 PM Eastern

PLNT vs. PTON, WMG, DKNG, MSGS, and LTH

Should you buy Planet Fitness stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Fitness with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Fitness include Peloton Interactive (PTON), Warner Music Group (WMG), DraftKings (DKNG), Madison Square Garden (MSGS), and Life Time Group (LTH). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Peloton Interactive?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Peloton Interactive (NASDAQ:PTON) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Planet Fitness currently has a consensus target price of $77.81, indicating a potential upside of 49.94%. Peloton Interactive has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 51.65%. Given Peloton Interactive's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peloton Interactive is more favorable than Planet Fitness.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peloton Interactive
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Peloton Interactive's net margin of 0.94%. Peloton Interactive's return on equity of -6.95% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Fitness16.52% -81.29% 8.66%
Peloton Interactive 0.94%-6.95%1.09%

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.0% of Peloton Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Peloton Interactive shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.54, meaning that its stock price is 154% more volatile than the broader market.

Planet Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peloton Interactive. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peloton Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness$1.38B2.98$219.10M$2.7718.73
Peloton Interactive$2.49B0.95-$118.90M$0.04136.00

In the previous week, Peloton Interactive had 2 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Peloton Interactive and 3 mentions for Planet Fitness. Peloton Interactive's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.12 indicating that Peloton Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Peloton Interactive
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Peloton Interactive on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Warner Music Group?

Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Warner Music Group had 1 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Warner Music Group and 3 mentions for Planet Fitness. Warner Music Group's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.12 indicating that Warner Music Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Warner Music Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Warner Music Group presently has a consensus target price of $37.38, indicating a potential upside of 35.71%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $77.81, indicating a potential upside of 49.94%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Warner Music Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Warner Music Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

96.9% of Warner Music Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Warner Music Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Warner Music Group has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warner Music Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warner Music Group$6.71B2.14$365M$0.8532.40
Planet Fitness$1.38B2.98$219.10M$2.7718.73

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 6.34%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 62.01% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Warner Music Group6.34% 62.01% 4.98%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Summary

Warner Music Group beats Planet Fitness on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to DraftKings?

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, DraftKings had 15 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for DraftKings and 3 mentions for Planet Fitness. DraftKings' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.12 indicating that DraftKings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DraftKings
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Planet Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DraftKings. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DraftKings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DraftKings$6.05B2.06$3.71M$0.06419.17
Planet Fitness$1.38B2.98$219.10M$2.7718.73

DraftKings has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

37.7% of DraftKings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 47.2% of DraftKings shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to DraftKings' net margin of 0.93%. DraftKings' return on equity of 13.51% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DraftKings0.93% 13.51% 2.24%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

DraftKings presently has a consensus target price of $34.21, suggesting a potential upside of 36.01%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $77.81, suggesting a potential upside of 49.94%. Given Planet Fitness' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than DraftKings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DraftKings
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
29 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

DraftKings beats Planet Fitness on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Madison Square Garden?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Madison Square Garden (NYSE:MSGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Madison Square Garden's net margin of -2.07%. Madison Square Garden's return on equity of 0.00% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Fitness16.52% -81.29% 8.66%
Madison Square Garden -2.07%N/A -1.39%

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness$1.38B2.98$219.10M$2.7718.73
Madison Square Garden$1.04B8.56-$22.44M-$0.93N/A

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Madison Square Garden shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of Madison Square Garden shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Fitness currently has a consensus target price of $77.81, indicating a potential upside of 49.94%. Madison Square Garden has a consensus target price of $357.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.34%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Madison Square Garden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Madison Square Garden
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 1 more articles in the media than Madison Square Garden. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Planet Fitness and 2 mentions for Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.12 indicating that Madison Square Garden is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Madison Square Garden
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Madison Square Garden on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Life Time Group?

Life Time Group (NYSE:LTH) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Life Time Group's net margin of 12.56%. Life Time Group's return on equity of 10.10% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Life Time Group12.56% 10.10% 3.91%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

79.4% of Life Time Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of Life Time Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Life Time Group has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Life Time Group currently has a consensus target price of $40.80, indicating a potential upside of 8.02%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $77.81, indicating a potential upside of 49.94%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Life Time Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Life Time Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Life Time Group has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Life Time Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Life Time Group$3.00B2.81$373.67M$1.7122.09
Planet Fitness$1.38B2.98$219.10M$2.7718.73

In the previous week, Life Time Group had 1 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Life Time Group and 3 mentions for Planet Fitness. Life Time Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.12 indicating that Life Time Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Life Time Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Life Time Group beats Planet Fitness on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Fitness News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PLNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PLNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PLNT vs. The Competition

MetricPlanet FitnessLEISURE&REC SVS IndustryDiscretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.12B$9.07B$7.13B$23.13B
Dividend YieldN/A2.43%3.05%4.06%
P/E Ratio18.7317.3820.3931.09
Price / Sales2.9812.003.9020.82
Price / Cash10.2011.9613.4318.65
Price / Book-8.665.033.714.66
Net Income$219.10M$362.25M$247.03M$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.06%-0.20%-1.26%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-0.42%11.01%-0.01%0.17%
1 Year Performance-52.33%34.70%3.88%24.36%

Planet Fitness Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PLNT
Planet Fitness
4.3247 of 5 stars
$51.89
+1.6%
$77.81
+49.9%
-52.3%$4.12B$1.38B18.734,020
PTON
Peloton Interactive
4.2619 of 5 stars
$5.80
+4.5%
$8.25
+42.2%
-12.1%$2.40B$2.49B145.042,145
WMG
Warner Music Group
4.8564 of 5 stars
$28.49
+0.1%
$37.38
+31.2%
+3.8%$14.85B$6.71B33.525,500
DKNG
DraftKings
4.2746 of 5 stars
$28.79
-0.7%
$34.21
+18.8%
-36.7%$14.39B$6.05B479.835,500
MSGS
Madison Square Garden
1.3769 of 5 stars
$378.89
-1.5%
$356.80
-5.8%
+82.2%$9.26B$1.04BN/A1,007

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PLNT) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners