Go Pro

Planet Fitness (PLNT) Competitors

Planet Fitness logo
$50.54 -0.79 (-1.54%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$50.84 +0.29 (+0.58%)
As of 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PLNT vs. PTON, WMG, DKNG, MSGS, and LTH

Should you buy Planet Fitness stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Fitness with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Fitness include Peloton Interactive (PTON), Warner Music Group (WMG), DraftKings (DKNG), Madison Square Garden (MSGS), and Life Time Group (LTH). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Peloton Interactive?

Peloton Interactive (NASDAQ:PTON) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Peloton Interactive's net margin of 0.94%. Peloton Interactive's return on equity of -6.95% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peloton Interactive0.94% -6.95% 1.09%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.52, suggesting that its stock price is 152% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 4 more articles in the media than Peloton Interactive. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Planet Fitness and 2 mentions for Peloton Interactive. Peloton Interactive's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Planet Fitness' score of 1.01 indicating that Peloton Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peloton Interactive
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Planet Fitness
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

77.0% of Peloton Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Peloton Interactive shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peloton Interactive. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peloton Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peloton Interactive$2.49B1.06-$118.90M$0.04152.00
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.03$219.10M$2.7718.25

Peloton Interactive currently has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 35.69%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $74.71, indicating a potential upside of 47.82%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Peloton Interactive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peloton Interactive
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Peloton Interactive on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Warner Music Group?

Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Warner Music Group has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warner Music Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warner Music Group$6.71B2.24$365M$0.8533.82
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.03$219.10M$2.7718.25

Warner Music Group presently has a consensus target price of $37.87, suggesting a potential upside of 31.71%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $74.71, suggesting a potential upside of 47.82%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Warner Music Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Warner Music Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.74
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 6.34%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 62.01% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Warner Music Group6.34% 62.01% 4.98%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

96.9% of Warner Music Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Warner Music Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Warner Music Group had 5 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Warner Music Group and 6 mentions for Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Warner Music Group's score of 0.58 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Warner Music Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Warner Music Group beats Planet Fitness on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to DraftKings?

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Planet Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DraftKings. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DraftKings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DraftKings$6.05B2.17$3.71M$0.06440.83
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.03$219.10M$2.7718.25

In the previous week, DraftKings had 24 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for DraftKings and 6 mentions for Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat DraftKings' score of 0.83 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DraftKings
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

DraftKings presently has a consensus price target of $34.46, indicating a potential upside of 30.30%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $74.71, indicating a potential upside of 47.82%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than DraftKings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DraftKings
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
29 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

37.7% of DraftKings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.2% of DraftKings shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to DraftKings' net margin of 0.93%. DraftKings' return on equity of 13.51% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DraftKings0.93% 13.51% 2.24%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

DraftKings has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

DraftKings and Planet Fitness tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Madison Square Garden?

Madison Square Garden (NYSE:MSGS) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Madison Square Garden had 2 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Madison Square Garden and 6 mentions for Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Madison Square Garden's score of 0.36 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Madison Square Garden
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Planet Fitness
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden$1.04B8.95-$22.44M-$0.93N/A
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.03$219.10M$2.7718.25

Madison Square Garden currently has a consensus target price of $357.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.59%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $74.71, suggesting a potential upside of 47.82%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Madison Square Garden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Square Garden
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

68.9% of Madison Square Garden shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of Madison Square Garden shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Madison Square Garden has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Madison Square Garden's net margin of -2.07%. Madison Square Garden's return on equity of 0.00% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Square Garden-2.07% N/A -1.39%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Madison Square Garden on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Life Time Group?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Life Time Group (NYSE:LTH) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Life Time Group's net margin of 12.56%. Life Time Group's return on equity of 10.10% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Fitness16.52% -81.29% 8.66%
Life Time Group 12.56%10.10%3.91%

Planet Fitness presently has a consensus price target of $74.71, indicating a potential upside of 47.82%. Life Time Group has a consensus price target of $44.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.12%. Given Planet Fitness' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Life Time Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Fitness
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Life Time Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Life Time Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Life Time Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Life Time Group has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Life Time Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.03$219.10M$2.7718.25
Life Time Group$3.00B3.08$373.67M$1.7124.25

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 2 more articles in the media than Life Time Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Planet Fitness and 4 mentions for Life Time Group. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Life Time Group's score of 0.26 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Life Time Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Life Time Group has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Planet Fitness and Life Time Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Fitness News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PLNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PLNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PLNT vs. The Competition

MetricPlanet FitnessLEISURE&REC SVS IndustryDiscretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.08B$8.85B$7.24B$23.46B
Dividend YieldN/A2.50%3.02%4.02%
P/E Ratio18.2518.1220.2731.06
Price / Sales3.0311.394.0519.75
Price / Cash9.8811.7413.4318.64
Price / Book-8.444.893.774.77
Net Income$219.10M$362.25M$246.03M$1.06B
7 Day Performance-3.56%-1.64%-0.29%-0.56%
1 Month Performance-0.78%-3.20%-1.06%-0.11%
1 Year Performance-54.29%18.26%-1.57%16.64%

Planet Fitness Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PLNT
Planet Fitness
4.305 of 5 stars
$50.54
-1.5%
$74.71
+47.8%
-53.7%$4.08B$1.32B18.254,020
PTON
Peloton Interactive
4.3147 of 5 stars
$5.87
+2.1%
$8.25
+40.5%
-8.2%$2.49B$2.49B143.752,145
WMG
Warner Music Group
4.8514 of 5 stars
$27.40
-3.1%
$37.38
+36.4%
-2.6%$14.75B$6.71B29.775,500
DKNG
DraftKings
4.2197 of 5 stars
$26.21
+1.2%
$34.24
+30.6%
-38.4%$12.84B$6.05B199.155,500
MSGS
Madison Square Garden
1.6213 of 5 stars
$386.39
-2.2%
$357.00
-7.6%
+85.0%$9.51B$1.04BN/A1,007

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PLNT) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners