Does the media refer more to PLNT or PTON?

In the previous week, Peloton Interactive had 3 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Peloton Interactive and 9 mentions for Planet Fitness. Peloton Interactive's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that Peloton Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Fitness 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Peloton Interactive 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is PLNT or DKNG more profitable?

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to DraftKings' net margin of 0.93%. DraftKings' return on equity of 13.51% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Planet Fitness 16.52% -81.29% 8.66% DraftKings 0.93% 13.51% 2.24%

Does the media prefer PLNT or DKNG?

In the previous week, DraftKings had 8 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for DraftKings and 9 mentions for Planet Fitness. DraftKings' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that DraftKings is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Fitness 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral DraftKings 9 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer MSGS or PLNT?

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 4 more articles in the media than Madison Square Garden. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Fitness and 5 mentions for Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that Madison Square Garden is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Madison Square Garden 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Planet Fitness 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer PLNT or LTH?

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 6 more articles in the media than Life Time Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Fitness and 3 mentions for Life Time Group. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Life Time Group's score of 0.11 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Fitness 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Life Time Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor PLNT or SGHC?

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 6 more articles in the media than Super Group (SGHC). MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Fitness and 3 mentions for Super Group (SGHC). Super Group (SGHC)'s average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that Super Group (SGHC) is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Planet Fitness 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Super Group (SGHC) 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Planet Fitness (PLNT) Competitors

$53.29 +0.41 (+0.78%)

Closing price 06/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$53.35 +0.06 (+0.11%)

As of 09:28 AM Eastern

Compare

PLNT vs. PTON, DKNG, MSGS, LTH, and SGHC

Should you buy Planet Fitness stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Fitness with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Fitness include Peloton Interactive (PTON), DraftKings (DKNG), Madison Square Garden (MSGS), Life Time Group (LTH), and Super Group (SGHC) (SGHC). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Peloton Interactive?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Peloton Interactive (NASDAQ:PTON) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.0% of Peloton Interactive shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Peloton Interactive shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Peloton Interactive had 3 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Peloton Interactive and 9 mentions for Planet Fitness. Peloton Interactive's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that Peloton Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Peloton Interactive	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.54, indicating that its share price is 154% more volatile than the broader market.

Planet Fitness presently has a consensus target price of $77.81, suggesting a potential upside of 46.00%. Peloton Interactive has a consensus target price of $8.25, suggesting a potential upside of 30.13%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Peloton Interactive.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Peloton Interactive	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Planet Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peloton Interactive. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peloton Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness	$1.32B	3.20	$219.10M	$2.77	19.24
Peloton Interactive	$2.49B	1.10	-$118.90M	$0.04	158.50

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Peloton Interactive's net margin of 0.94%. Peloton Interactive's return on equity of -6.95% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Fitness	16.52%	-81.29%	8.66%
Peloton Interactive	0.94%	-6.95%	1.09%

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Peloton Interactive on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to DraftKings?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DraftKings has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Planet Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DraftKings. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DraftKings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness	$1.32B	3.20	$219.10M	$2.77	19.24
DraftKings	$6.05B	2.07	$3.71M	$0.06	421.67

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to DraftKings' net margin of 0.93%. DraftKings' return on equity of 13.51% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Fitness	16.52%	-81.29%	8.66%
DraftKings	0.93%	13.51%	2.24%

Planet Fitness presently has a consensus price target of $77.81, suggesting a potential upside of 46.00%. DraftKings has a consensus price target of $34.15, suggesting a potential upside of 34.97%. Given Planet Fitness' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than DraftKings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
DraftKings	2 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

In the previous week, DraftKings had 8 more articles in the media than Planet Fitness. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for DraftKings and 9 mentions for Planet Fitness. DraftKings' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that DraftKings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
DraftKings	9 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.7% of DraftKings shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.2% of DraftKings shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

DraftKings beats Planet Fitness on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Madison Square Garden?

Madison Square Garden (NYSE:MSGS) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Madison Square Garden has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Madison Square Garden's net margin of -2.07%. Madison Square Garden's return on equity of 0.00% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Madison Square Garden	-2.07%	N/A	-1.39%
Planet Fitness	16.52%	-81.29%	8.66%

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 4 more articles in the media than Madison Square Garden. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Fitness and 5 mentions for Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that Madison Square Garden is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Madison Square Garden	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Planet Fitness	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden	$1.04B	8.86	-$22.44M	-$0.93	N/A
Planet Fitness	$1.32B	3.20	$219.10M	$2.77	19.24

68.9% of Madison Square Garden shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of Madison Square Garden shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Madison Square Garden currently has a consensus target price of $356.80, suggesting a potential downside of 6.66%. Planet Fitness has a consensus target price of $77.81, suggesting a potential upside of 46.00%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Madison Square Garden.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Madison Square Garden	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Planet Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Madison Square Garden on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Life Time Group?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Life Time Group (NYSE:LTH) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Planet Fitness presently has a consensus price target of $77.81, suggesting a potential upside of 46.00%. Life Time Group has a consensus price target of $40.30, suggesting a potential upside of 25.25%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Life Time Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Life Time Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.82

Life Time Group has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Fitness. Life Time Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness	$1.32B	3.20	$219.10M	$2.77	19.24
Life Time Group	$3.00B	2.39	$373.67M	$1.71	18.82

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Life Time Group has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Life Time Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Life Time Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Life Time Group's net margin of 12.56%. Life Time Group's return on equity of 10.10% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Fitness	16.52%	-81.29%	8.66%
Life Time Group	12.56%	10.10%	3.91%

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 6 more articles in the media than Life Time Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Fitness and 3 mentions for Life Time Group. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Life Time Group's score of 0.11 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Life Time Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Life Time Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Super Group (SGHC) (NYSE:SGHC) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Super Group (SGHC). Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Super Group (SGHC), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness	$1.32B	3.20	$219.10M	$2.77	19.24
Super Group (SGHC)	$2.23B	2.88	$217M	$0.48	26.43

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Super Group (SGHC) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Fitness currently has a consensus price target of $77.81, suggesting a potential upside of 46.00%. Super Group (SGHC) has a consensus price target of $17.57, suggesting a potential upside of 38.52%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Super Group (SGHC).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Planet Fitness	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Super Group (SGHC)	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Super Group (SGHC) has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 6 more articles in the media than Super Group (SGHC). MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Planet Fitness and 3 mentions for Super Group (SGHC). Super Group (SGHC)'s average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.40 indicating that Super Group (SGHC) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Super Group (SGHC)	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Super Group (SGHC)'s net margin of 10.58%. Super Group (SGHC)'s return on equity of 42.85% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Planet Fitness	16.52%	-81.29%	8.66%
Super Group (SGHC)	10.58%	42.85%	26.15%

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Super Group (SGHC) on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Fitness News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PLNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PLNT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Planet Fitness	LEISURE&REC SVS Industry	Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$4.20B	$8.51B	$7.40B	$23.18B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.56%	2.84%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	19.24	16.21	21.55	31.31
Price / Sales	3.20	10.45	3.90	24.47
Price / Cash	10.18	11.03	15.04	24.80
Price / Book	-8.90	4.71	3.70	4.74
Net Income	$219.10M	$362.25M	$247.47M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	2.44%	2.37%	0.86%	0.62%
1 Month Performance	-18.52%	3.71%	16.09%	1.54%
1 Year Performance	-49.44%	38.93%	17.10%	26.87%

Planet Fitness Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PLNT Planet Fitness	4.5836 of 5 stars	$53.29 +0.8%	$77.81 +46.0%	-49.4%	$4.20B	$1.32B	19.24	4,020
PTON Peloton Interactive	3.6001 of 5 stars	$5.71 flat	$8.25 +44.5%	-3.9%	$2.47B	$2.49B	142.79	2,145	High Trading Volume
DKNG DraftKings	4.1146 of 5 stars	$25.12 flat	$34.32 +36.6%	-25.0%	$12.46B	$6.05B	418.67	5,500	Analyst Forecast
MSGS Madison Square Garden	1.3899 of 5 stars	$353.80 0.0%	$342.20 -3.3%	+101.7%	$8.52B	$1.04B	N/A	1,007	Analyst Forecast
LTH Life Time Group	4.6594 of 5 stars	$32.09 +0.1%	$40.00 +24.7%	+8.4%	$7.14B	$3.00B	18.76	44,000	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PLNT) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Planet Fitness (PLNT) Competitors

PLNT vs. PTON, DKNG, MSGS, LTH, and SGHC

How does Planet Fitness compare to Peloton Interactive?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to DraftKings?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to Madison Square Garden?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to Life Time Group?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PLNT vs. The Competition

Planet Fitness Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Planet Fitness (PLNT) Competitors

PLNT vs. PTON, DKNG, MSGS, LTH, and SGHC

How does Planet Fitness compare to Peloton Interactive?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of PLNT or PTON?

Does the media refer more to PLNT or PTON?

Which has more risk and volatility, PLNT or PTON?

Do analysts recommend PLNT or PTON?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PLNT or PTON?

Is PLNT or PTON more profitable?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to DraftKings?

Which has more risk & volatility, PLNT or DKNG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PLNT or DKNG?

Is PLNT or DKNG more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PLNT or DKNG?

Does the media prefer PLNT or DKNG?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PLNT or DKNG?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to Madison Square Garden?

Which has more volatility and risk, MSGS or PLNT?

Is MSGS or PLNT more profitable?

Does the media prefer MSGS or PLNT?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MSGS or PLNT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MSGS or PLNT?

Do analysts rate MSGS or PLNT?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to Life Time Group?

Do analysts rate PLNT or LTH?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, PLNT or LTH?

Which has more volatility & risk, PLNT or LTH?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PLNT or LTH?

Is PLNT or LTH more profitable?

Does the media prefer PLNT or LTH?

Summary

How does Planet Fitness compare to Super Group (SGHC)?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PLNT or SGHC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in PLNT or SGHC?

Do analysts rate PLNT or SGHC?

Which has more risk & volatility, PLNT or SGHC?

Does the media favor PLNT or SGHC?

Is PLNT or SGHC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PLNT vs. The Competition

Planet Fitness Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools