Free Trial

Planet Fitness (PLNT) Competitors

Planet Fitness logo
$50.54 +1.05 (+2.13%)
Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$50.20 -0.35 (-0.69%)
As of 06:37 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PLNT vs. PTON, WMG, DKNG, MSGS, and RSI

Should you buy Planet Fitness stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Planet Fitness with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Planet Fitness include Peloton Interactive (PTON), Warner Music Group (WMG), DraftKings (DKNG), Madison Square Garden (MSGS), and Rush Street Interactive (RSI). These companies are all part of the "consumer discretionary" sector.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Peloton Interactive?

Peloton Interactive (NASDAQ:PTON) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

77.0% of Peloton Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Peloton Interactive shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Peloton Interactive presently has a consensus price target of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 56.84%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $81.32, indicating a potential upside of 60.90%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Peloton Interactive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peloton Interactive
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

Planet Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peloton Interactive. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peloton Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peloton Interactive$2.49B0.90-$118.90M$0.04131.50
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.05$219.10M$2.7718.25

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 21 more articles in the media than Peloton Interactive. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Planet Fitness and 35 mentions for Peloton Interactive. Peloton Interactive's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.38 indicating that Peloton Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peloton Interactive
18 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
13 Very Positive mention(s)
17 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Peloton Interactive's net margin of 0.94%. Peloton Interactive's return on equity of -6.95% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peloton Interactive0.94% -6.95% 1.09%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Peloton Interactive has a beta of 2.5, indicating that its stock price is 150% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Peloton Interactive on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Warner Music Group?

Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Warner Music Group's net margin of 6.34%. Warner Music Group's return on equity of 62.01% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Warner Music Group6.34% 62.01% 4.98%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Warner Music Group presently has a consensus price target of $37.38, indicating a potential upside of 14.33%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $81.32, indicating a potential upside of 60.90%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Warner Music Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Warner Music Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

96.9% of Warner Music Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Warner Music Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Warner Music Group has higher revenue and earnings than Planet Fitness. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warner Music Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Warner Music Group$6.71B2.55$365M$0.8538.46
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.05$219.10M$2.7718.25

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 24 more articles in the media than Warner Music Group. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Planet Fitness and 32 mentions for Warner Music Group. Warner Music Group's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.38 indicating that Warner Music Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Warner Music Group
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
14 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
13 Very Positive mention(s)
17 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Warner Music Group has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Warner Music Group beats Planet Fitness on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to DraftKings?

DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to DraftKings' net margin of 0.93%. DraftKings' return on equity of 13.51% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DraftKings0.93% 13.51% 2.24%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

DraftKings presently has a consensus price target of $34.87, indicating a potential upside of 39.32%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $81.32, indicating a potential upside of 60.90%. Given Planet Fitness' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than DraftKings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DraftKings
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
27 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

37.7% of DraftKings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.2% of DraftKings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Planet Fitness has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DraftKings. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DraftKings, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DraftKings$6.05B2.05$3.71M$0.06417.17
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.05$219.10M$2.7718.25

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 10 more articles in the media than DraftKings. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Planet Fitness and 46 mentions for DraftKings. DraftKings' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.38 indicating that DraftKings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DraftKings
19 Very Positive mention(s)
10 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Planet Fitness
13 Very Positive mention(s)
17 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

DraftKings has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats DraftKings on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Madison Square Garden?

Madison Square Garden (NYSE:MSGS) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Madison Square Garden's net margin of -2.07%. Madison Square Garden's return on equity of 0.00% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Madison Square Garden-2.07% N/A -1.39%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden$1.04B8.05-$22.44M-$0.93N/A
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.05$219.10M$2.7718.25

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 43 more articles in the media than Madison Square Garden. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Planet Fitness and 13 mentions for Madison Square Garden. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Madison Square Garden's score of -0.07 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Madison Square Garden
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Planet Fitness
13 Very Positive mention(s)
17 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Madison Square Garden has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Madison Square Garden presently has a consensus price target of $334.80, indicating a potential downside of 3.69%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $81.32, indicating a potential upside of 60.90%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Madison Square Garden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Madison Square Garden
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

68.9% of Madison Square Garden shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Madison Square Garden shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Madison Square Garden on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Planet Fitness compare to Rush Street Interactive?

Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) and Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Rush Street Interactive's net margin of 2.98%. Rush Street Interactive's return on equity of 17.21% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rush Street Interactive2.98% 17.21% 8.00%
Planet Fitness 16.52%-81.29%8.66%

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Rush Street Interactive. Planet Fitness is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rush Street Interactive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rush Street Interactive$1.13B5.54$33.31M$0.3187.13
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.05$219.10M$2.7718.25

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 44 more articles in the media than Rush Street Interactive. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Planet Fitness and 12 mentions for Rush Street Interactive. Rush Street Interactive's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Planet Fitness' score of 0.38 indicating that Rush Street Interactive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rush Street Interactive
4 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Planet Fitness
13 Very Positive mention(s)
17 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
11 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Rush Street Interactive has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Planet Fitness has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Rush Street Interactive presently has a consensus price target of $28.63, indicating a potential upside of 5.98%. Planet Fitness has a consensus price target of $81.32, indicating a potential upside of 60.90%. Given Planet Fitness' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Rush Street Interactive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rush Street Interactive
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

24.8% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Rush Street Interactive on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Planet Fitness News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PLNT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PLNT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PLNT vs. The Competition

MetricPlanet FitnessLEISURE&REC SVS IndustryDiscretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.96B$7.94B$7.15B$22.96B
Dividend YieldN/A2.42%2.91%4.06%
P/E Ratio18.2515.3618.4628.29
Price / Sales3.057.103.6624.50
Price / Cash9.5310.1514.6525.11
Price / Book-8.384.403.644.73
Net Income$219.10M$420.73M$247.44M$1.07B
7 Day Performance17.16%-2.98%-1.84%-1.11%
1 Month Performance-29.61%-4.44%7.78%1.36%
1 Year Performance-48.52%20.83%12.23%24.41%

Planet Fitness Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PLNT
Planet Fitness
4.7287 of 5 stars
$50.54
+2.1%
$81.32
+60.9%
-46.3%$3.96B$1.32B18.254,020
PTON
Peloton Interactive
4.0241 of 5 stars
$5.14
-4.1%
$8.60
+67.3%
-22.8%$2.28B$2.49BN/A2,145
WMG
Warner Music Group
4.454 of 5 stars
$28.11
+0.5%
$36.00
+28.1%
+19.0%$14.62B$6.71B48.475,500
DKNG
DraftKings
4.66 of 5 stars
$23.57
+2.5%
$34.84
+47.8%
-33.6%$11.40B$6.05BN/A5,500
MSGS
Madison Square Garden
1.3345 of 5 stars
$339.63
-0.3%
$333.80
-1.7%
+76.5%$8.20B$1.04BN/A1,007

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PLNT) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners