NYSE:MSGS

Madison Square Garden Sports Competitors

$183.93

-1.31 (-0.71 %)

(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$183.05

Now: $183.93▼

$185.46

50-Day Range

$177.32

MA: $191.16▼

$204.83

52-Week Range

$140.15

Now: $183.93▼

$242.34

Volume93,400 shs

Average Volume233,061 shs

Market Capitalization$4.44 billion

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1

Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) Vs. MTN, SIX, SEAS, IGT, RSI, and FUN

Should you be buying MSGS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "miscellaneous amusement & recreation services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Madison Square Garden Sports, including Vail Resorts (MTN), Six Flags Entertainment (SIX), SeaWorld Entertainment (SEAS), International Game Technology (IGT), Rush Street Interactive (RSI), and Cedar Fair (FUN).

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. Vail Resorts Stock

Vail Resorts (NYSE:MTN) and Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Vail Resorts has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Vail Resorts and Madison Square Garden Sports' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vail Resorts	2.82%	3.91%	1.15%
Madison Square Garden Sports	N/A	-2.36%	-1.05%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Vail Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Vail Resorts and Madison Square Garden Sports' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vail Resorts	$1.96 billion	6.24	$98.83 million	$3.19	95.42
Madison Square Garden Sports	$603.32 million	7.35	$-182,390,000.00	($4.86)	-37.85

Vail Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vail Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Vail Resorts and Madison Square Garden Sports, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vail Resorts	0	10	7	0	2.41
Madison Square Garden Sports	0	1	9	0	2.90

Vail Resorts presently has a consensus target price of $289.1538, indicating a potential downside of 5.01%. Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus target price of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than Vail Resorts.

Summary

Vail Resorts beats Madison Square Garden Sports on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. Six Flags Entertainment Stock

Six Flags Entertainment (NYSE:SIX) and Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 2.45, meaning that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Six Flags Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Six Flags Entertainment	-68.52%	N/A	-11.82%
Madison Square Garden Sports	N/A	-2.36%	-1.05%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.9% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Six Flags Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Six Flags Entertainment	$1.49 billion	2.69	$179.07 million	$2.24	20.93
Madison Square Garden Sports	$603.32 million	7.35	$-182,390,000.00	($4.86)	-37.85

Six Flags Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Six Flags Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Six Flags Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Six Flags Entertainment	0	6	7	0	2.54
Madison Square Garden Sports	0	1	9	0	2.90

Six Flags Entertainment presently has a consensus target price of $34.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.69%. Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus target price of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than Six Flags Entertainment.

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. SeaWorld Entertainment Stock

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SeaWorld Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SeaWorld Entertainment	0	4	7	0	2.64
Madison Square Garden Sports	0	1	9	0	2.90

SeaWorld Entertainment presently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, indicating a potential downside of 19.47%. Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus target price of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Volatility and Risk

SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, meaning that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SeaWorld Entertainment	-50.54%	-352.53%	-10.24%
Madison Square Garden Sports	N/A	-2.36%	-1.05%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SeaWorld Entertainment	$1.40 billion	2.80	$89.48 million	$1.58	31.61
Madison Square Garden Sports	$603.32 million	7.35	$-182,390,000.00	($4.86)	-37.85

SeaWorld Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SeaWorld Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Sports beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. International Game Technology Stock

Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) and International Game Technology (NYSE:IGT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Madison Square Garden Sports and International Game Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Madison Square Garden Sports	0	1	9	0	2.90
International Game Technology	0	4	6	0	2.60

Madison Square Garden Sports currently has a consensus price target of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. International Game Technology has a consensus price target of $18.2750, indicating a potential upside of 9.96%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than International Game Technology.

Volatility and Risk

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, International Game Technology has a beta of 2.34, suggesting that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and International Game Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Madison Square Garden Sports	N/A	-2.36%	-1.05%
International Game Technology	-21.60%	0.59%	0.09%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of International Game Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and International Game Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden Sports	$603.32 million	7.35	$-182,390,000.00	($4.86)	-37.85
International Game Technology	$4.79 billion	0.71	$-19,020,000.00	$1.08	15.39

International Game Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Game Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. Rush Street Interactive Stock

Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) and Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Madison Square Garden Sports and Rush Street Interactive, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Madison Square Garden Sports	0	1	9	0	2.90
Rush Street Interactive	0	1	4	0	2.80

Madison Square Garden Sports currently has a consensus price target of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. Rush Street Interactive has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 81.82%. Given Rush Street Interactive's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rush Street Interactive is more favorable than Madison Square Garden Sports.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Rush Street Interactive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Madison Square Garden Sports	N/A	-2.36%	-1.05%
Rush Street Interactive	N/A	N/A	N/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by institutional investors. 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Rush Street Interactive's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden Sports	$603.32 million	7.35	$-182,390,000.00	($4.86)	-37.85
Rush Street Interactive	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Rush Street Interactive has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Sports beats Rush Street Interactive on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Madison Square Garden Sports vs. Cedar Fair Stock

Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) and Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Madison Square Garden Sports and Cedar Fair, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Madison Square Garden Sports	0	1	9	0	2.90
Cedar Fair	0	2	8	0	2.80

Madison Square Garden Sports currently has a consensus price target of $205.8889, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. Cedar Fair has a consensus price target of $49.10, indicating a potential downside of 1.07%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than Cedar Fair.

Volatility and Risk

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Cedar Fair's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Madison Square Garden Sports	N/A	-2.36%	-1.05%
Cedar Fair	-119.04%	N/A	-14.59%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are held by institutional investors. 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Madison Square Garden Sports and Cedar Fair's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Madison Square Garden Sports	$603.32 million	7.35	$-182,390,000.00	($4.86)	-37.85
Cedar Fair	$1.47 billion	1.91	$172.37 million	$3.08	16.11

Cedar Fair has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cedar Fair, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Sports beats Cedar Fair on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.