CNC vs. XAR, NXQ, ELCO, QTX, AOM, CLBS, ACC, WNWD, SPA, and BGO
Should you be buying Concurrent Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Concurrent Technologies include Xaar (XAR), Nexteq (NXQ), Eleco (ELCO), Quartix Technologies (QTX), ActiveOps (AOM), Celebrus Technologies (CLBS), Access Intelligence (ACC), Windward (WNWD), 1Spatial (SPA), and Bango (BGO). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.
Xaar (LON:XAR) and Concurrent Technologies (LON:CNC) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment and community ranking.
Xaar pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Concurrent Technologies pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Xaar pays out -26,666.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Concurrent Technologies pays out 15,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Xaar is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
In the previous week, Concurrent Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Xaar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Concurrent Technologies and 0 mentions for Xaar. Xaar's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Concurrent Technologies' score of 0.00 indicating that Concurrent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Concurrent Technologies has a net margin of 6.80% compared to Concurrent Technologies' net margin of -3.08%. Xaar's return on equity of 6.43% beat Concurrent Technologies' return on equity.
82.8% of Xaar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Concurrent Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Xaar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Concurrent Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Xaar received 221 more outperform votes than Concurrent Technologies when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 59.52% of users gave Xaar an outperform vote while only 56.67% of users gave Concurrent Technologies an outperform vote.
Xaar has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Concurrent Technologies has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Concurrent Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Xaar. Xaar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Concurrent Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
Concurrent Technologies beats Xaar on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Concurrent Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Concurrent Technologies Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
