HSD vs. FEN, IVPG, GCL, NEOA, ARB, TENT, CHI, BEMO, TRU, and CRS
Should you be buying Hansard Global stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Hansard Global include Frenkel Topping Group (FEN), Invesco Select Glo Eq (IVPG), Geiger Counter (GCL), New Energy One Acquisition (NEOA), Argo Blockchain (ARB), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), CT UK High Income Trust (CHI), Barings Emerging EMEA Opportunities (BEMO), TruFin (TRU), and Crystal Amber Fund (CRS). These companies are all part of the "financial services" sector.
Hansard Global (LON:HSD) and Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, community ranking, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.
Hansard Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Hansard Global has a net margin of 5.97% compared to Frenkel Topping Group's net margin of 5.06%. Hansard Global's return on equity of 30.81% beat Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity.
Hansard Global received 165 more outperform votes than Frenkel Topping Group when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 82.32% of users gave Hansard Global an outperform vote while only 57.49% of users gave Frenkel Topping Group an outperform vote.
Hansard Global has higher revenue and earnings than Frenkel Topping Group. Hansard Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
In the previous week, Hansard Global had 1 more articles in the media than Frenkel Topping Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hansard Global and 0 mentions for Frenkel Topping Group. Hansard Global's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frenkel Topping Group'saverage media sentiment score.
22.7% of Hansard Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by institutional investors. 61.4% of Hansard Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Hansard Global pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.2%. Frenkel Topping Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Hansard Global pays out 8,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Frenkel Topping Group pays out 10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hansard Global is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
Summary
Hansard Global beats Frenkel Topping Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Hansard Global News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HSD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HSD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Hansard Global Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
