LUNR vs. MTAL, NN, IPAX, CODA, LGST, AKLI, GETR, MIND, BOWL, and NOC
Should you be buying Intuitive Machines stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Intuitive Machines include Metals Acquisition (MTAL), NextNav (NN), Inflection Point Acquisition (IPAX), Coda Octopus Group (CODA), Semper Paratus Acquisition (LGST), Akili (AKLI), Getaround (GETR), MIND Technology (MIND), Bowlero (BOWL), and Northrop Grumman (NOC).
Metals Acquisition (NYSE:MTAL) and Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, community ranking, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.
Metals Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Metals Acquisition's net margin of -19.48%. Intuitive Machines' return on equity of 0.00% beat Metals Acquisition's return on equity.
Intuitive Machines received 16 more outperform votes than Metals Acquisition when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave Intuitive Machines an outperform vote while only 77.78% of users gave Metals Acquisition an outperform vote.
Intuitive Machines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Metals Acquisition.
In the previous week, Intuitive Machines had 4 more articles in the media than Metals Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Intuitive Machines and 2 mentions for Metals Acquisition. Metals Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.68 indicating that Intuitive Machines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
87.5% of Metals Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Metals Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.7% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Metals Acquisition has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Metals Acquisition currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.71%. Intuitive Machines has a consensus target price of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 128.29%. Given Metals Acquisition's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Metals Acquisition.
Summary
Intuitive Machines beats Metals Acquisition on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Intuitive Machines News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LUNR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Intuitive Machines Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
