Go Pro

Intuitive Machines (LUNR) Competitors

Intuitive Machines logo
$15.15 -0.99 (-6.13%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$15.02 -0.13 (-0.83%)
As of 07:22 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LUNR vs. SITM, DRS, PL, SIMO, and ALGM

Should you buy Intuitive Machines stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intuitive Machines with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intuitive Machines include SiTime (SITM), Leonardo DRS (DRS), Planet Labs PBC (PL), Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO), and Allegro MicroSystems (ALGM). These companies are all part of the "electronic equipment" industry.

How does Intuitive Machines compare to SiTime?

Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) and SiTime (NASDAQ:SITM) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Intuitive Machines presently has a consensus price target of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 107.92%. SiTime has a consensus price target of $661.88, indicating a potential upside of 9.85%. Given Intuitive Machines' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than SiTime.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intuitive Machines
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
SiTime
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

In the previous week, SiTime had 1 more articles in the media than Intuitive Machines. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for SiTime and 9 mentions for Intuitive Machines. SiTime's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.68 indicating that SiTime is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Machines
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SiTime
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SiTime has a beta of 2.91, indicating that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the broader market.

SiTime has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Machines. SiTime is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intuitive Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Machines$328.24M10.02-$83.29M-$0.88N/A
SiTime$379.91M41.87-$42.90M-$1.01N/A

SiTime has a net margin of -6.38% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. SiTime's return on equity of 0.53% beat Intuitive Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Machines-32.69% N/A -5.41%
SiTime -6.38%0.53%0.47%

72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of SiTime shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of SiTime shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

SiTime beats Intuitive Machines on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Machines compare to Leonardo DRS?

Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) and Leonardo DRS (NASDAQ:DRS) are both aerospace companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines had 3 more articles in the media than Leonardo DRS. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Intuitive Machines and 6 mentions for Leonardo DRS. Leonardo DRS's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.68 indicating that Leonardo DRS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Machines
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Leonardo DRS
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Intuitive Machines currently has a consensus target price of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 107.92%. Leonardo DRS has a consensus target price of $53.75, suggesting a potential upside of 23.99%. Given Intuitive Machines' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Leonardo DRS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intuitive Machines
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Leonardo DRS
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 12.02% beat Intuitive Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Machines-32.69% N/A -5.41%
Leonardo DRS 7.85%12.02%7.59%

Leonardo DRS has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Machines. Intuitive Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Leonardo DRS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Machines$328.24M10.02-$83.29M-$0.88N/A
Leonardo DRS$3.70B3.13$278M$1.0740.51

72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.8% of Leonardo DRS shares are held by institutional investors. 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Leonardo DRS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Leonardo DRS beats Intuitive Machines on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Machines compare to Planet Labs PBC?

Planet Labs PBC (NYSE:PL) and Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) are both mid-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

41.7% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by institutional investors. 16.4% of Planet Labs PBC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intuitive Machines has a net margin of -32.69% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -111.17%. Intuitive Machines' return on equity of 0.00% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Labs PBC-111.17% -105.29% -35.54%
Intuitive Machines -32.69%N/A -5.41%

Planet Labs PBC currently has a consensus price target of $35.11, suggesting a potential upside of 35.05%. Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 107.92%. Given Intuitive Machines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Planet Labs PBC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Labs PBC
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Intuitive Machines
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

Intuitive Machines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Planet Labs PBC. Planet Labs PBC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intuitive Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Labs PBC$335.61M27.61-$246.86M-$1.14N/A
Intuitive Machines$328.24M10.02-$83.29M-$0.88N/A

In the previous week, Planet Labs PBC had 2 more articles in the media than Intuitive Machines. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Planet Labs PBC and 9 mentions for Intuitive Machines. Intuitive Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Planet Labs PBC's score of 0.19 indicating that Intuitive Machines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Labs PBC
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Intuitive Machines
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Intuitive Machines beats Planet Labs PBC on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Machines compare to Silicon Motion Technology?

Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) and Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) are both electronic equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of 16.02% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity of 20.24% beat Intuitive Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intuitive Machines-32.69% N/A -5.41%
Silicon Motion Technology 16.02%20.24%14.46%

In the previous week, Silicon Motion Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Intuitive Machines. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology and 9 mentions for Intuitive Machines. Silicon Motion Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.68 indicating that Silicon Motion Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intuitive Machines
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Silicon Motion Technology
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Silicon Motion Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Machines. Intuitive Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silicon Motion Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intuitive Machines$328.24M10.02-$83.29M-$0.88N/A
Silicon Motion Technology$1.06B9.57$122.64M$5.0359.54

Intuitive Machines currently has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 107.92%. Silicon Motion Technology has a consensus price target of $246.43, suggesting a potential downside of 17.72%. Given Intuitive Machines' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Silicon Motion Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intuitive Machines
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.7, indicating that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats Intuitive Machines on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intuitive Machines compare to Allegro MicroSystems?

Allegro MicroSystems (NASDAQ:ALGM) and Intuitive Machines (NASDAQ:LUNR) are both mid-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Allegro MicroSystems presently has a consensus price target of $55.20, indicating a potential upside of 8.55%. Intuitive Machines has a consensus price target of $31.50, indicating a potential upside of 107.92%. Given Intuitive Machines' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intuitive Machines is more favorable than Allegro MicroSystems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Allegro MicroSystems
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Intuitive Machines
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

Allegro MicroSystems has a net margin of -1.67% compared to Intuitive Machines' net margin of -32.69%. Allegro MicroSystems' return on equity of 6.09% beat Intuitive Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Allegro MicroSystems-1.67% 6.09% 4.11%
Intuitive Machines -32.69%N/A -5.41%

In the previous week, Intuitive Machines had 4 more articles in the media than Allegro MicroSystems. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Intuitive Machines and 5 mentions for Allegro MicroSystems. Allegro MicroSystems' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Intuitive Machines' score of 0.68 indicating that Allegro MicroSystems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Allegro MicroSystems
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intuitive Machines
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Allegro MicroSystems has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intuitive Machines has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Allegro MicroSystems has higher revenue and earnings than Intuitive Machines. Allegro MicroSystems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intuitive Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Allegro MicroSystems$890.10M10.64-$14.90M-$0.09N/A
Intuitive Machines$328.24M10.02-$83.29M-$0.88N/A

56.5% of Allegro MicroSystems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Intuitive Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Allegro MicroSystems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.1% of Intuitive Machines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Allegro MicroSystems beats Intuitive Machines on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intuitive Machines News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LUNR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LUNR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LUNR vs. The Competition

MetricIntuitive MachinesAEROSP/DEFENSE IndustryAerospace SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.29B$52.82B$31.27B$12.42B
Dividend YieldN/A1.20%0.88%8.01%
P/E Ratio-17.2225.1243.1924.29
Price / Sales10.0271.2732.6795.64
Price / CashN/A17.9629.5849.39
Price / Book-3.626.307.746.29
Net Income-$83.29M$1.56B$903.77M$330.86M
7 Day Performance-19.80%-8.32%-8.31%-2.41%
1 Month Performance-43.09%-9.87%-7.35%-0.64%
1 Year Performance39.50%-0.22%21.43%20.09%

Intuitive Machines Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LUNR
Intuitive Machines
4.0275 of 5 stars
$15.15
-6.1%
$31.50
+107.9%
+48.6%$3.29B$328.24MN/A1
SITM
SiTime
4.156 of 5 stars
$615.46
+2.3%
$661.88
+7.5%
+204.7%$16.25B$379.91MN/A380
DRS
Leonardo DRS
4.8123 of 5 stars
$45.37
+3.8%
$53.75
+18.5%
-7.2%$12.10B$3.65B42.407,300
PL
Planet Labs PBC
3.4676 of 5 stars
$30.87
-1.6%
$35.11
+13.7%
+324.6%$11.00B$335.61MN/A800
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology
4.7204 of 5 stars
$318.86
+6.0%
$246.43
-22.7%
+344.2%$10.81B$885.63M63.392,009

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LUNR) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners