Go Pro

Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO) Competitors

Silicon Motion Technology logo
$253.60 -1.50 (-0.59%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$252.50 -1.10 (-0.43%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SIMO vs. CLS, ON, UI, ERIC, and GFS

Should you buy Silicon Motion Technology stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Silicon Motion Technology with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Silicon Motion Technology include Celestica (CLS), onsemi (ON), Ubiquiti (UI), Ericsson (ERIC), and GlobalFoundries (GFS).

How does Silicon Motion Technology compare to Celestica?

Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Silicon Motion Technology currently has a consensus target price of $341.43, suggesting a potential upside of 34.63%. Celestica has a consensus target price of $437.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.09%. Given Silicon Motion Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Silicon Motion Technology is more favorable than Celestica.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Celestica
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96

In the previous week, Celestica had 32 more articles in the media than Silicon Motion Technology. MarketBeat recorded 72 mentions for Celestica and 40 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Silicon Motion Technology's score of 0.90 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Silicon Motion Technology
20 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Celestica
46 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
15 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.05, suggesting that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than Silicon Motion Technology. Silicon Motion Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celestica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silicon Motion Technology$885.63M9.71$122.64M$8.5329.73
Celestica$12.39B3.07$832.50M$9.6234.39

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of 22.06% compared to Celestica's net margin of 7.16%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Silicon Motion Technology22.06% 33.82% 23.71%
Celestica 7.16%39.96%11.06%

Summary

Celestica beats Silicon Motion Technology on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Silicon Motion Technology compare to onsemi?

onsemi (NASDAQ:ON) and Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

onsemi presently has a consensus target price of $102.24, indicating a potential upside of 25.28%. Silicon Motion Technology has a consensus target price of $341.43, indicating a potential upside of 34.63%. Given Silicon Motion Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Silicon Motion Technology is more favorable than onsemi.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
onsemi
1 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of 22.06% compared to onsemi's net margin of 9.46%. Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity of 33.82% beat onsemi's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
onsemi9.46% 12.79% 7.80%
Silicon Motion Technology 22.06%33.82%23.71%

97.7% of onsemi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of onsemi shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Silicon Motion Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than onsemi. Silicon Motion Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than onsemi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
onsemi$6.00B5.33$121M$1.4157.88
Silicon Motion Technology$885.63M9.71$122.64M$8.5329.73

In the previous week, onsemi had 319 more articles in the media than Silicon Motion Technology. MarketBeat recorded 359 mentions for onsemi and 40 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology. onsemi's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Silicon Motion Technology's score of 0.90 indicating that onsemi is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
onsemi
236 Very Positive mention(s)
51 Positive mention(s)
35 Neutral mention(s)
24 Negative mention(s)
13 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Silicon Motion Technology
20 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

onsemi has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats onsemi on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Silicon Motion Technology compare to Ubiquiti?

Ubiquiti (NYSE:UI) and Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

4.0% of Ubiquiti shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 93.1% of Ubiquiti shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ubiquiti has a net margin of 30.43% compared to Silicon Motion Technology's net margin of 22.06%. Ubiquiti's return on equity of 95.62% beat Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ubiquiti30.43% 95.62% 56.55%
Silicon Motion Technology 22.06%33.82%23.71%

Ubiquiti pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Silicon Motion Technology pays an annual dividend of $1.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Ubiquiti pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Silicon Motion Technology pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Silicon Motion Technology had 35 more articles in the media than Ubiquiti. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology and 5 mentions for Ubiquiti. Ubiquiti's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Silicon Motion Technology's score of 0.90 indicating that Ubiquiti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ubiquiti
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Silicon Motion Technology
20 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ubiquiti has higher revenue and earnings than Silicon Motion Technology. Silicon Motion Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ubiquiti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ubiquiti$2.57B13.11$711.92M$15.5635.84
Silicon Motion Technology$885.63M9.71$122.64M$8.5329.73

Ubiquiti currently has a consensus price target of $750.67, suggesting a potential upside of 34.61%. Silicon Motion Technology has a consensus price target of $341.43, suggesting a potential upside of 34.63%. Given Silicon Motion Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Silicon Motion Technology is more favorable than Ubiquiti.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ubiquiti
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Ubiquiti beats Silicon Motion Technology on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Silicon Motion Technology compare to Ericsson?

Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) and Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERIC) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Silicon Motion Technology currently has a consensus price target of $341.43, suggesting a potential upside of 34.63%. Ericsson has a consensus price target of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.13%. Given Silicon Motion Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Silicon Motion Technology is more favorable than Ericsson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ericsson
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ericsson has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of 22.06% compared to Ericsson's net margin of 10.72%. Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity of 33.82% beat Ericsson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Silicon Motion Technology22.06% 33.82% 23.71%
Ericsson 10.72%20.63%7.61%

78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Ericsson shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Silicon Motion Technology had 36 more articles in the media than Ericsson. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology and 4 mentions for Ericsson. Silicon Motion Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Ericsson's score of 0.03 indicating that Silicon Motion Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Silicon Motion Technology
20 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ericsson
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Silicon Motion Technology pays an annual dividend of $1.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Ericsson pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Silicon Motion Technology pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ericsson pays out 28.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Ericsson has higher revenue and earnings than Silicon Motion Technology. Ericsson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silicon Motion Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silicon Motion Technology$885.63M9.71$122.64M$8.5329.73
Ericsson$24.19B1.37$2.91B$0.7812.58

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats Ericsson on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Silicon Motion Technology compare to GlobalFoundries?

GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) and Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Silicon Motion Technology. Silicon Motion Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlobalFoundries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlobalFoundries$6.79B4.04$885M$1.3935.96
Silicon Motion Technology$885.63M9.71$122.64M$8.5329.73

GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

GlobalFoundries currently has a consensus price target of $74.63, indicating a potential upside of 49.28%. Silicon Motion Technology has a consensus price target of $341.43, indicating a potential upside of 34.63%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Silicon Motion Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlobalFoundries
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Silicon Motion Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Silicon Motion Technology has a net margin of 22.06% compared to GlobalFoundries' net margin of 11.40%. Silicon Motion Technology's return on equity of 33.82% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlobalFoundries11.40% 6.85% 4.76%
Silicon Motion Technology 22.06%33.82%23.71%

GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Silicon Motion Technology pays an annual dividend of $1.99 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. GlobalFoundries pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Silicon Motion Technology pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Silicon Motion Technology had 13 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Silicon Motion Technology and 27 mentions for GlobalFoundries. GlobalFoundries' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Silicon Motion Technology's score of 0.90 indicating that GlobalFoundries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GlobalFoundries
19 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Silicon Motion Technology
20 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

78.0% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats GlobalFoundries on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Silicon Motion Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SIMO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SIMO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SIMO vs. The Competition

MetricSilicon Motion TechnologySemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$8.60B$96.98B$28.18B$12.47B
Dividend Yield0.78%1.58%2.77%9.45%
P/E Ratio29.7387.3379.7824.66
Price / Sales9.7189.61595.9188.77
Price / Cash56.4062.4246.1659.99
Price / Book10.389.756.955.90
Net Income$122.64M$1.84B$628.91M$336.31M
7 Day Performance-6.39%-3.00%0.79%0.09%
1 Month Performance-15.67%-12.51%-4.58%-5.17%
1 Year Performance231.85%105.82%148.05%18.61%

Silicon Motion Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology
4.998 of 5 stars
$253.60
-0.6%
$341.43
+34.6%
+231.9%$8.60B$885.63M29.732,009
CLS
Celestica
4.9864 of 5 stars
$305.05
-8.9%
$427.42
+40.1%
+69.8%$35.07B$12.39B36.8929,591
ON
onsemi
4.6735 of 5 stars
$86.81
-3.7%
$102.24
+17.8%
+43.6%$34.02B$6.00B61.5722,670
UI
Ubiquiti
4.3863 of 5 stars
$525.53
-0.7%
$750.67
+42.8%
+30.5%$31.81B$2.57B33.771,667
ERIC
Ericsson
3.3247 of 5 stars
$9.34
+0.3%
$11.00
+17.8%
+35.3%$31.49B$24.19B11.9788,826

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SIMO) was last updated on 8/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners