SiTime (SITM) Competitors

Diodes has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SiTime has a beta of 2.94, suggesting that its stock price is 194% more volatile than the broader market.

Diodes has a net margin of 5.27% compared to SiTime's net margin of 3.01%. SiTime's return on equity of 4.99% beat Diodes' return on equity.

In the previous week, SiTime had 12 more articles in the media than Diodes. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for SiTime and 21 mentions for Diodes. SiTime's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Diodes' score of 0.66 indicating that SiTime is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.2% of Diodes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of SiTime shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Diodes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of SiTime shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diodes has higher revenue and earnings than SiTime. Diodes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SiTime, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diodes presently has a consensus target price of $135.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.44%. SiTime has a consensus target price of $688.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.27%. Given Diodes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Diodes is more favorable than SiTime.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a net margin of 12.18% compared to SiTime's net margin of 3.01%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' return on equity of 14.39% beat SiTime's return on equity.

In the previous week, SiTime had 15 more articles in the media than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for SiTime and 18 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries. SiTime's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Kulicke and Soffa Industries' score of 0.82 indicating that SiTime is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has higher revenue and earnings than SiTime. Kulicke and Soffa Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SiTime, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

84.3% of SiTime shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of SiTime shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SiTime presently has a consensus target price of $688.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.27%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a consensus target price of $69.67, suggesting a potential downside of 22.99%. Given SiTime's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SiTime is more favorable than Kulicke and Soffa Industries.

SiTime has a beta of 2.94, suggesting that its stock price is 194% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than SiTime. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SiTime, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SiTime currently has a consensus price target of $688.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.27%. Lam Research has a consensus price target of $358.47, suggesting a potential upside of 15.14%. Given Lam Research's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lam Research is more favorable than SiTime.

SiTime has a beta of 2.94, suggesting that its share price is 194% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 10 more articles in the media than SiTime. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Lam Research and 33 mentions for SiTime. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat SiTime's score of 0.83 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

84.3% of SiTime shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of SiTime shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to SiTime's net margin of 3.01%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat SiTime's return on equity.

Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.81, indicating that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SiTime has a beta of 2.94, indicating that its share price is 194% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, SiTime had 2 more articles in the media than Lattice Semiconductor. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for SiTime and 31 mentions for Lattice Semiconductor. SiTime's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Lattice Semiconductor's score of 0.74 indicating that SiTime is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of 5.58% compared to SiTime's net margin of 3.01%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 10.92% beat SiTime's return on equity.

98.1% of Lattice Semiconductor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of SiTime shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Lattice Semiconductor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of SiTime shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lattice Semiconductor presently has a consensus price target of $144.38, indicating a potential upside of 14.79%. SiTime has a consensus price target of $688.75, indicating a potential upside of 2.27%. Given Lattice Semiconductor's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Lattice Semiconductor is more favorable than SiTime.

Lattice Semiconductor has higher revenue and earnings than SiTime. Lattice Semiconductor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SiTime, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.