United Microelectronics (UMC) Competitors

United Microelectronics currently has a consensus target price of $8.60, suggesting a potential downside of 62.49%. Analog Devices has a consensus target price of $460.09, suggesting a potential upside of 13.27%. Given Analog Devices' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Analog Devices is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

In the previous week, Analog Devices had 21 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Analog Devices and 16 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Analog Devices' score of 0.54 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Analog Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Analog Devices' net margin of 29.79%. United Microelectronics' return on equity of 21.00% beat Analog Devices' return on equity.

United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Analog Devices pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Analog Devices has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. United Microelectronics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Qualcomm had 22 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Qualcomm and 16 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Qualcomm's score of 0.42 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

74.4% of Qualcomm shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Qualcomm shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Qualcomm's net margin of 21.01%. Qualcomm's return on equity of 38.36% beat United Microelectronics' return on equity.

Qualcomm presently has a consensus price target of $204.10, suggesting a potential upside of 16.30%. United Microelectronics has a consensus price target of $8.60, suggesting a potential downside of 62.49%. Given Qualcomm's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Qualcomm is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

Qualcomm has higher revenue and earnings than United Microelectronics. Qualcomm is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Microelectronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Qualcomm has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Qualcomm pays an annual dividend of $3.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Qualcomm pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Qualcomm has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Qualcomm is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

6.8% of ASE Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.9% of ASE Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, United Microelectronics had 11 more articles in the media than ASE Technology. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for United Microelectronics and 5 mentions for ASE Technology. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat ASE Technology's score of 0.38 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

United Microelectronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ASE Technology. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASE Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Microelectronics has a consensus price target of $8.60, suggesting a potential downside of 62.49%. Given United Microelectronics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe United Microelectronics is more favorable than ASE Technology.

ASE Technology has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

ASE Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. ASE Technology pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. United Microelectronics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to ASE Technology's net margin of 8.52%. United Microelectronics' return on equity of 21.00% beat ASE Technology's return on equity.

5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United Microelectronics presently has a consensus price target of $8.60, suggesting a potential downside of 62.49%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $1,731.42, suggesting a potential upside of 24.90%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. United Microelectronics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

United Microelectronics has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Monolithic Power Systems had 3 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems and 16 mentions for United Microelectronics. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat United Microelectronics' score of 0.62 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 22.31% beat United Microelectronics' return on equity.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.