United Microelectronics (UMC) Competitors

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Marvell Technology's net margin of 28.99%. United Microelectronics' return on equity of 21.00% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity.

In the previous week, Marvell Technology had 46 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 59 mentions for Marvell Technology and 13 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Marvell Technology's score of 0.64 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Marvell Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Marvell Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Marvell Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Marvell Technology has higher revenue and earnings than United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marvell Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Microelectronics presently has a consensus price target of $8.60, suggesting a potential downside of 55.27%. Marvell Technology has a consensus price target of $245.45, suggesting a potential upside of 16.32%. Given Marvell Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marvell Technology is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marvell Technology has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Qualcomm had 24 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Qualcomm and 13 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Qualcomm's score of 1.15 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Qualcomm has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

74.4% of Qualcomm shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Qualcomm shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Qualcomm presently has a consensus target price of $203.63, indicating a potential upside of 24.07%. United Microelectronics has a consensus target price of $8.60, indicating a potential downside of 55.27%. Given Qualcomm's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Qualcomm is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

Qualcomm has higher revenue and earnings than United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Qualcomm, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Qualcomm pays an annual dividend of $3.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Qualcomm pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Qualcomm has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Qualcomm is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Qualcomm's net margin of 21.01%. Qualcomm's return on equity of 38.36% beat United Microelectronics' return on equity.

5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.8% of ASE Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.9% of ASE Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, United Microelectronics had 2 more articles in the media than ASE Technology. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for United Microelectronics and 11 mentions for ASE Technology. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat ASE Technology's score of 1.23 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to ASE Technology's net margin of 8.52%. United Microelectronics' return on equity of 21.00% beat ASE Technology's return on equity.

United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. ASE Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ASE Technology pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. United Microelectronics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

United Microelectronics currently has a consensus target price of $8.60, indicating a potential downside of 55.27%. Given United Microelectronics' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe United Microelectronics is more favorable than ASE Technology.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASE Technology has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

United Microelectronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ASE Technology. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASE Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Microelectronics pays an annual dividend of $0.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Monolithic Power Systems pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. United Microelectronics pays out 29.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Monolithic Power Systems pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Monolithic Power Systems has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. United Microelectronics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Monolithic Power Systems had 6 more articles in the media than United Microelectronics. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems and 13 mentions for United Microelectronics. United Microelectronics' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Monolithic Power Systems' score of 0.84 indicating that United Microelectronics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

5.1% of United Microelectronics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United Microelectronics presently has a consensus price target of $8.60, indicating a potential downside of 55.27%. Monolithic Power Systems has a consensus price target of $1,705.82, indicating a potential upside of 20.59%. Given Monolithic Power Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Monolithic Power Systems is more favorable than United Microelectronics.

United Microelectronics has a net margin of 33.18% compared to Monolithic Power Systems' net margin of 24.41%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 22.31% beat United Microelectronics' return on equity.

United Microelectronics has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.69, suggesting that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

United Microelectronics has higher revenue and earnings than Monolithic Power Systems. United Microelectronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.