Nokia Competitors

Nokia (NYSE:NOK) and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) (NASDAQ:ERIC) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nokia and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nokia. Nokia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nokia and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

4.2% of Nokia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Nokia has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Nokia and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Nokia currently has a consensus target price of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) has a consensus target price of $15.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.25%. Given Nokia's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Nokia is more favorable than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ).

Summary

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) beats Nokia on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nokia (NYSE:NOK) and Motorola Solutions (NYSE:MSI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nokia and Motorola Solutions' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Motorola Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nokia. Nokia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Motorola Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nokia and Motorola Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

4.2% of Nokia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Motorola Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Motorola Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Nokia has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Nokia and Motorola Solutions, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Nokia currently has a consensus target price of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. Motorola Solutions has a consensus target price of $189.75, suggesting a potential downside of 5.43%. Given Nokia's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Nokia is more favorable than Motorola Solutions.

Summary

Motorola Solutions beats Nokia on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nokia (NYSE:NOK) and Ubiquiti (NYSE:UI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Nokia and Ubiquiti's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Nokia and Ubiquiti, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Nokia currently has a consensus target price of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. Ubiquiti has a consensus target price of $223.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 20.11%. Given Nokia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Nokia is more favorable than Ubiquiti.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Nokia and Ubiquiti's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ubiquiti has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nokia. Nokia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ubiquiti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Nokia has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ubiquiti has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

4.2% of Nokia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Ubiquiti shares are owned by institutional investors. 89.6% of Ubiquiti shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ubiquiti beats Nokia on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CommScope (NASDAQ:COMM) and Nokia (NYSE:NOK) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares CommScope and Nokia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for CommScope and Nokia, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CommScope currently has a consensus price target of $17.1818, suggesting a potential downside of 6.67%. Nokia has a consensus price target of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. Given Nokia's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Nokia is more favorable than CommScope.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CommScope and Nokia's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Nokia has higher revenue and earnings than CommScope. CommScope is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nokia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

CommScope has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nokia has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

95.1% of CommScope shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Nokia shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of CommScope shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Viasat (NASDAQ:VSAT) and Nokia (NYSE:NOK) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Viasat and Nokia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Viasat and Nokia's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Nokia has higher revenue and earnings than Viasat.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.1% of Viasat shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Nokia shares are held by institutional investors. 6.3% of Viasat shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Viasat has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nokia has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Viasat and Nokia, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Viasat currently has a consensus price target of $64.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.61%. Nokia has a consensus price target of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. Given Viasat's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Viasat is more favorable than Nokia.

Nokia (NYSE:NOK) and EchoStar (NASDAQ:SATS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Nokia and EchoStar, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Nokia presently has a consensus target price of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. EchoStar has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.17%. Given EchoStar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EchoStar is more favorable than Nokia.

Profitability

This table compares Nokia and EchoStar's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nokia and EchoStar's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nokia has higher revenue and earnings than EchoStar. EchoStar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nokia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

4.2% of Nokia shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of EchoStar shares are held by institutional investors. 51.8% of EchoStar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Nokia has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EchoStar has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Nokia beats EchoStar on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.