Go Pro

GlobalFoundries (GFS) Competitors

GlobalFoundries logo
$53.18 +2.36 (+4.64%)
Closing price 08/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$53.05 -0.13 (-0.24%)
As of 05:12 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GFS vs. ADI, DIOD, ENTG, LRCX, and LSCC

Should you buy GlobalFoundries stock or one of its competitors? GlobalFoundries's main competitors and comparable companies include Analog Devices (ADI), Diodes (DIOD), Entegris (ENTG), Lam Research (LRCX), and Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors & semiconductor equipment" industry.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Analog Devices?

GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

GlobalFoundries presently has a consensus target price of $75.11, suggesting a potential upside of 41.24%. Analog Devices has a consensus target price of $441.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.72%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Analog Devices.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Analog Devices
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than GlobalFoundries. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlobalFoundries$6.79B4.30$885M$1.2841.55
Analog Devices$11.02B16.99$2.27B$6.7357.12

In the previous week, Analog Devices had 23 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Analog Devices and 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Analog Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 0.39 indicating that Analog Devices is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GlobalFoundries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Analog Devices
26 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

86.8% of Analog Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analog Devices has a net margin of 26.01% compared to GlobalFoundries' net margin of 10.36%. Analog Devices' return on equity of 14.37% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlobalFoundries10.36% 6.69% 4.69%
Analog Devices 26.01%14.37%10.13%

GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. GlobalFoundries pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Analog Devices pays out 65.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Analog Devices has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Analog Devices is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Analog Devices beats GlobalFoundries on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Diodes?

GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) and Diodes (NASDAQ:DIOD) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Diodes. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlobalFoundries$6.79B4.30$885M$1.2841.55
Diodes$1.48B3.33$66.14M$1.8557.86

In the previous week, GlobalFoundries had 6 more articles in the media than Diodes. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries and 13 mentions for Diodes. Diodes' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 0.39 indicating that Diodes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GlobalFoundries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Diodes
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GlobalFoundries currently has a consensus price target of $75.11, indicating a potential upside of 41.24%. Diodes has a consensus price target of $135.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.12%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Diodes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Diodes
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Diodes' net margin of 5.27%. GlobalFoundries' return on equity of 6.69% beat Diodes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlobalFoundries10.36% 6.69% 4.69%
Diodes 5.27%4.33%3.41%

99.2% of Diodes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Diodes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diodes has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GlobalFoundries beats Diodes on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Entegris?

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Entegris pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GlobalFoundries pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Entegris' net margin of 9.18%. Entegris' return on equity of 12.25% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Entegris9.18% 12.25% 5.84%
GlobalFoundries 10.36%6.69%4.69%

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Entegris. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Entegris$3.20B7.68$235.60M$1.9980.94
GlobalFoundries$6.79B4.30$885M$1.2841.55

Entegris has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Entegris presently has a consensus price target of $170.89, suggesting a potential upside of 6.09%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus price target of $75.11, suggesting a potential upside of 41.24%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Entegris.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Entegris
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

In the previous week, GlobalFoundries had 2 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries and 17 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 0.39 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Entegris
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Entegris beats GlobalFoundries on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Lam Research?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Lam Research presently has a consensus price target of $358.47, suggesting a potential upside of 9.92%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus price target of $75.11, suggesting a potential upside of 41.24%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lam Research
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
26 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to GlobalFoundries' net margin of 10.36%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lam Research31.27% 67.60% 33.48%
GlobalFoundries 10.36%6.69%4.69%

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than GlobalFoundries. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research$23.23B17.56$7.27B$5.7656.62
GlobalFoundries$6.79B4.30$885M$1.2841.55

In the previous week, Lam Research had 23 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Lam Research and 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 0.39 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lam Research
25 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GlobalFoundries pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Summary

Lam Research beats GlobalFoundries on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Lattice Semiconductor?

Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ:LSCC) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Lattice Semiconductor's net margin of 5.58%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 10.92% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lattice Semiconductor5.58% 10.92% 8.94%
GlobalFoundries 10.36%6.69%4.69%

98.1% of Lattice Semiconductor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Lattice Semiconductor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, GlobalFoundries had 4 more articles in the media than Lattice Semiconductor. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for GlobalFoundries and 15 mentions for Lattice Semiconductor. Lattice Semiconductor's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 0.39 indicating that Lattice Semiconductor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lattice Semiconductor
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Lattice Semiconductor currently has a consensus target price of $144.38, indicating a potential upside of 11.69%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus target price of $75.11, indicating a potential upside of 41.24%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Lattice Semiconductor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lattice Semiconductor
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Lattice Semiconductor. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lattice Semiconductor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lattice Semiconductor$523.26M33.85$3.08M$0.26497.19
GlobalFoundries$6.79B4.30$885M$1.2841.55

Summary

Lattice Semiconductor beats GlobalFoundries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GlobalFoundries News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFS vs. The Competition

MetricGlobalFoundriesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$27.88B$103.59B$29.84B$12.88B
Dividend Yield0.94%1.51%2.73%10.74%
P/E Ratio41.5589.0374.9725.09
Price / Sales4.3097.42597.7185.19
Price / Cash13.8067.7851.8550.58
Price / Book2.4611.199.366.23
Net Income$885M$1.86B$679.63M$347.40M
7 Day Performance5.60%4.54%2.44%1.35%
1 Month Performance-16.83%1.56%2.38%0.51%
1 Year Performance58.74%126.13%196.79%18.99%

GlobalFoundries Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFS
GlobalFoundries
4.7276 of 5 stars
$53.18
+4.6%
$75.11
+41.2%
+61.9%$27.88B$6.79B41.5514,000
ADI
Analog Devices
4.976 of 5 stars
$383.92
-1.5%
$441.00
+14.9%
+65.7%$189.93B$11.02B57.0524,500
DIOD
Diodes
4.6543 of 5 stars
$100.94
-4.0%
$135.00
+33.7%
+100.3%$4.84B$1.48B54.567,989
ENTG
Entegris
3.4639 of 5 stars
$144.21
-5.2%
$165.56
+14.8%
+112.0%$23.19B$3.33B72.477,700
LRCX
Lam Research
4.8294 of 5 stars
$306.40
-1.6%
$358.47
+17.0%
+209.8%$389.37B$23.23B53.1919,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GFS) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners