Go Pro

GlobalFoundries (GFS) Competitors

GlobalFoundries logo
$43.90 -0.03 (-0.08%)
As of 10:12 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GFS vs. ADI, DIOD, ENTG, LSCC, and MCHP

Should you buy GlobalFoundries stock or one of its competitors? GlobalFoundries's main competitors and comparable companies include Analog Devices (ADI), Diodes (DIOD), Entegris (ENTG), Lattice Semiconductor (LSCC), and Microchip Technology (MCHP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors & semiconductor equipment" industry.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Analog Devices?

GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than GlobalFoundries. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlobalFoundries$6.79B3.51$885M$1.2833.95
Analog Devices$11.02B15.51$2.27B$8.4341.84

86.8% of Analog Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analog Devices has a net margin of 29.79% compared to GlobalFoundries' net margin of 10.36%. Analog Devices' return on equity of 16.39% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlobalFoundries10.36% 6.69% 4.69%
Analog Devices 29.79%16.39%11.49%

GlobalFoundries currently has a consensus price target of $74.32, suggesting a potential upside of 71.03%. Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $454.63, suggesting a potential upside of 28.89%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Analog Devices.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Analog Devices
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
26 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Analog Devices had 44 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Analog Devices and 6 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Analog Devices' average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 1.25 indicating that Analog Devices is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GlobalFoundries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Analog Devices
45 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. GlobalFoundries pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Analog Devices pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Analog Devices has increased its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Analog Devices is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Analog Devices beats GlobalFoundries on 17 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Diodes?

Diodes (NASDAQ:DIOD) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Diodes' net margin of 5.27%. GlobalFoundries' return on equity of 6.69% beat Diodes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diodes5.27% 4.33% 3.41%
GlobalFoundries 10.36%6.69%4.69%

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Diodes. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diodes$1.48B2.69$66.14M$1.8546.76
GlobalFoundries$6.79B3.51$885M$1.2833.95

Diodes has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Diodes had 6 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Diodes and 6 mentions for GlobalFoundries. GlobalFoundries' average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Diodes' score of 1.09 indicating that GlobalFoundries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diodes
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diodes currently has a consensus price target of $135.00, suggesting a potential upside of 56.07%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus price target of $74.32, suggesting a potential upside of 71.03%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Diodes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diodes
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

99.2% of Diodes shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Diodes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

GlobalFoundries beats Diodes on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Entegris?

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Entegris has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Entegris pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GlobalFoundries pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Entegris currently has a consensus target price of $170.89, suggesting a potential upside of 34.39%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus target price of $74.32, suggesting a potential upside of 71.03%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Entegris.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Entegris
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Entegris. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Entegris$3.20B6.07$235.60M$1.9963.90
GlobalFoundries$6.79B3.51$885M$1.2833.95

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Entegris' net margin of 9.18%. Entegris' return on equity of 12.25% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Entegris9.18% 12.25% 5.84%
GlobalFoundries 10.36%6.69%4.69%

In the previous week, Entegris had 15 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Entegris and 6 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 1.25 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Entegris
17 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Entegris beats GlobalFoundries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Lattice Semiconductor?

GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) and Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ:LSCC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Lattice Semiconductor's net margin of 5.58%. Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 10.92% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlobalFoundries10.36% 6.69% 4.69%
Lattice Semiconductor 5.58%10.92%8.94%

98.1% of Lattice Semiconductor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Lattice Semiconductor shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Lattice Semiconductor. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lattice Semiconductor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlobalFoundries$6.79B3.51$885M$1.2833.95
Lattice Semiconductor$523.26M29.02$3.08M$0.26426.27

GlobalFoundries currently has a consensus target price of $74.32, suggesting a potential upside of 71.03%. Lattice Semiconductor has a consensus target price of $147.46, suggesting a potential upside of 33.05%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Lattice Semiconductor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32
Lattice Semiconductor
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.07

In the previous week, Lattice Semiconductor had 12 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Lattice Semiconductor and 6 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Lattice Semiconductor's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 1.25 indicating that Lattice Semiconductor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GlobalFoundries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lattice Semiconductor
12 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Lattice Semiconductor beats GlobalFoundries on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlobalFoundries compare to Microchip Technology?

Microchip Technology (NASDAQ:MCHP) and GlobalFoundries (NASDAQ:GFS) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlobalFoundries has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

91.5% of Microchip Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Microchip Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Microchip Technology had 23 more articles in the media than GlobalFoundries. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Microchip Technology and 6 mentions for GlobalFoundries. Microchip Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat GlobalFoundries' score of 1.25 indicating that Microchip Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Microchip Technology
27 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlobalFoundries
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Microchip Technology currently has a consensus target price of $98.67, indicating a potential upside of 39.15%. GlobalFoundries has a consensus target price of $74.32, indicating a potential upside of 71.03%. Given GlobalFoundries' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe GlobalFoundries is more favorable than Microchip Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Microchip Technology
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79
GlobalFoundries
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.32

GlobalFoundries has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Microchip Technology's net margin of 9.34%. Microchip Technology's return on equity of 14.97% beat GlobalFoundries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Microchip Technology9.34% 14.97% 6.80%
GlobalFoundries 10.36%6.69%4.69%

Microchip Technology pays an annual dividend of $1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. GlobalFoundries pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Microchip Technology pays out 271.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. GlobalFoundries pays out 37.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Microchip Technology has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Microchip Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

GlobalFoundries has higher revenue and earnings than Microchip Technology. GlobalFoundries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microchip Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Microchip Technology$4.71B8.17$230M$0.67105.83
GlobalFoundries$6.79B3.51$885M$1.2833.95

Summary

Microchip Technology beats GlobalFoundries on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GlobalFoundries News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFS vs. The Competition

MetricGlobalFoundriesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$24.08B$107.17B$29.70B$12.82B
Dividend Yield1.07%1.60%2.73%11.78%
P/E Ratio34.2971.2375.2224.97
Price / Sales3.5178.64585.0972.76
Price / Cash12.1461.5549.5252.85
Price / Book2.019.389.176.03
Net Income$885M$1.85B$677.06M$348.89M
7 Day Performance-4.86%-4.39%-2.15%-2.29%
1 Month Performance-13.08%0.18%1.81%2.94%
1 Year Performance31.04%92.06%184.04%14.08%

GlobalFoundries Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFS
GlobalFoundries
4.9379 of 5 stars
$43.90
-0.1%
$74.32
+69.3%
+31.6%$23.91B$6.79B34.0514,000
ADI
Analog Devices
4.9895 of 5 stars
$371.17
-0.5%
$454.63
+22.5%
+41.1%$180.79B$11.02B44.0324,500
DIOD
Diodes
4.3757 of 5 stars
$89.75
-4.6%
$135.00
+50.4%
+60.0%$4.33B$1.48B48.517,989
ENTG
Entegris
4.8706 of 5 stars
$138.25
-3.8%
$170.89
+23.6%
+54.7%$21.91B$3.20B69.477,700
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
4.4993 of 5 stars
$114.15
-3.0%
$144.38
+26.5%
+68.2%$16.12B$651.12M439.041,174

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GFS) was last updated on 9/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners