Teradyne (TER) Competitors

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 46 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 75 mentions for Applied Materials and 29 mentions for Teradyne. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Teradyne's score of 1.14 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Teradyne presently has a consensus price target of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.22%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $470.13, indicating a potential upside of 4.46%. Given Applied Materials' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Teradyne.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 6.17%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

Teradyne presently has a consensus target price of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.22%. Amkor Technology has a consensus target price of $67.38, indicating a potential downside of 3.14%. Given Amkor Technology's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Amkor Technology is more favorable than Teradyne.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 15 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Teradyne and 14 mentions for Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Teradyne's score of 1.14 indicating that Amkor Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Teradyne has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Amkor Technology has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 8.14%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 4 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Teradyne and 25 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat FormFactor's score of 0.82 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FormFactor has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne presently has a consensus price target of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.22%. FormFactor has a consensus price target of $132.45, indicating a potential upside of 6.31%. Given FormFactor's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.

KLA currently has a consensus price target of $1,842.19, indicating a potential downside of 4.14%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 9.22%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Teradyne.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $9.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. KLA pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 14 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Teradyne and 15 mentions for KLA. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat KLA's score of 0.82 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.