Teradyne (TER) Competitors

In the previous week, Teradyne had 11 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Teradyne and 73 mentions for Applied Materials. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Applied Materials' score of 1.05 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $599.19, suggesting a potential upside of 18.03%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $396.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.92%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amkor Technology currently has a consensus price target of $68.13, suggesting a potential upside of 36.61%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $396.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.92%. Given Amkor Technology's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Amkor Technology is more favorable than Teradyne.

Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amkor Technology has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 42 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Teradyne and 42 mentions for Amkor Technology. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Amkor Technology's score of 0.61 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.2, meaning that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 7.45%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FormFactor has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 12.80%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

FormFactor currently has a consensus price target of $127.45, indicating a potential upside of 20.01%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 7.92%. Given FormFactor's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.8% of FormFactor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of FormFactor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 56 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Teradyne and 28 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat FormFactor's score of 0.89 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Teradyne currently has a consensus target price of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 7.92%. KLA has a consensus target price of $219.10, indicating a potential upside of 19.85%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Teradyne.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 31 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Teradyne and 53 mentions for KLA. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat KLA's score of 0.58 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.