Teradyne (TER) Competitors

Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 39 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 61 mentions for Applied Materials and 22 mentions for Teradyne. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Teradyne's score of 0.99 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Teradyne presently has a consensus price target of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.50%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 44.24%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Teradyne.

Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amkor Technology has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 10 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Teradyne and 12 mentions for Amkor Technology. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Amkor Technology's score of 0.98 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amkor Technology presently has a consensus target price of $68.33, indicating a potential upside of 32.10%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Amkor Technology's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Amkor Technology is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 7.45%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

Teradyne has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Cohu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to Cohu's net margin of -7.43%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Cohu's return on equity.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cohu currently has a consensus target price of $68.75, indicating a potential upside of 20.44%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.50%. Given Cohu's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cohu is more favorable than Teradyne.

Cohu pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Cohu pays out -28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Cohu is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Cohu has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 17 more articles in the media than Cohu. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Teradyne and 5 mentions for Cohu. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Cohu's score of 0.80 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

FormFactor has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

98.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FormFactor presently has a consensus price target of $127.45, indicating a potential upside of 10.88%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.50%. Given FormFactor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 12.80%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 13 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Teradyne and 9 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat FormFactor's score of 0.84 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.