Teradyne (TER) Competitors

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 45 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 79 mentions for Applied Materials and 34 mentions for Teradyne. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus price target of $589.48, indicating a potential downside of 2.16%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $390.53, indicating a potential upside of 8.60%. Given Teradyne's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Teradyne is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 24 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Teradyne and 10 mentions for Amkor Technology. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Amkor Technology's score of 1.21 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.2, meaning that its share price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Teradyne currently has a consensus target price of $390.53, suggesting a potential upside of 8.60%. Amkor Technology has a consensus target price of $69.88, suggesting a potential downside of 0.84%. Given Teradyne's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Teradyne is more favorable than Amkor Technology.

Teradyne has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Amkor Technology has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 6.17%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

Teradyne presently has a consensus target price of $390.53, indicating a potential upside of 8.60%. FormFactor has a consensus target price of $132.45, indicating a potential upside of 12.71%. Given FormFactor's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 22 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Teradyne and 12 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat FormFactor's score of 0.81 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 8.14%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of FormFactor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of FormFactor shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FormFactor has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

KLA currently has a consensus price target of $287.80, suggesting a potential upside of 24.31%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $390.53, suggesting a potential upside of 8.60%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Teradyne.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 6 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Teradyne and 28 mentions for KLA. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat KLA's score of 0.69 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.