Teradyne (TER) Competitors

Teradyne currently has a consensus price target of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.60%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $659.83, indicating a potential upside of 34.02%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 25.77%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 39 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 97 mentions for Applied Materials and 58 mentions for Teradyne. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Applied Materials' score of 1.08 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 7.45%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Amkor Technology has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Teradyne has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.24, meaning that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Teradyne presently has a consensus target price of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.60%. Amkor Technology has a consensus target price of $68.13, indicating a potential upside of 35.55%. Given Amkor Technology's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amkor Technology is more favorable than Teradyne.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 47 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Teradyne and 11 mentions for Amkor Technology. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Amkor Technology's score of 1.24 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cohu presently has a consensus target price of $68.75, indicating a potential upside of 26.45%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.60%. Given Cohu's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cohu is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.7% of Cohu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 47 more articles in the media than Cohu. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Teradyne and 11 mentions for Cohu. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Cohu's score of 0.75 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cohu has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to Cohu's net margin of -7.43%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Cohu's return on equity.

98.8% of FormFactor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of FormFactor shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FormFactor has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 23 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Teradyne and 35 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat FormFactor's score of 1.02 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 12.80%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

FormFactor currently has a consensus price target of $127.45, indicating a potential upside of 11.65%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $396.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.60%. Given FormFactor's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.