Teradyne (TER) Competitors

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 105 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 150 mentions for Applied Materials and 45 mentions for Teradyne. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Teradyne's score of 1.14 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $489.16, indicating a potential downside of 20.73%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 22.41%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Teradyne.

Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amkor Technology has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Amkor Technology currently has a consensus price target of $67.38, suggesting a potential downside of 25.52%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 22.41%. Given Teradyne's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Teradyne is more favorable than Amkor Technology.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 6.17%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 27 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Teradyne and 18 mentions for Amkor Technology. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Amkor Technology's score of 0.90 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FormFactor presently has a consensus target price of $132.45, indicating a potential downside of 11.43%. Teradyne has a consensus target price of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 22.41%. Given FormFactor's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.

98.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 8.14%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 39 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Teradyne and 6 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat FormFactor's score of 0.54 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

FormFactor has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA presently has a consensus price target of $342.44, indicating a potential upside of 31.93%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 22.41%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Teradyne.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 30 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Teradyne and 15 mentions for KLA. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat KLA's score of 0.71 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

KLA has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Teradyne's return on equity.