Teradyne (TER) Competitors

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus price target of $489.16, suggesting a potential downside of 20.73%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 22.41%. Given Applied Materials' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Teradyne.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 104 more articles in the media than Teradyne. MarketBeat recorded 149 mentions for Applied Materials and 45 mentions for Teradyne. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Teradyne's score of 1.14 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Teradyne presently has a consensus price target of $339.80, indicating a potential downside of 22.41%. Amkor Technology has a consensus price target of $67.38, indicating a potential downside of 25.52%. Given Teradyne's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Teradyne is more favorable than Amkor Technology.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.8% of Amkor Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Amkor Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 28 more articles in the media than Amkor Technology. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Teradyne and 17 mentions for Amkor Technology. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Amkor Technology's score of 0.90 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teradyne has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amkor Technology. Amkor Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Amkor Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Amkor Technology has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Amkor Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amkor Technology has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to Amkor Technology's net margin of 6.17%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of FormFactor shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 39 more articles in the media than FormFactor. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Teradyne and 6 mentions for FormFactor. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat FormFactor's score of 0.54 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teradyne currently has a consensus target price of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 22.41%. FormFactor has a consensus target price of $132.45, suggesting a potential downside of 11.43%. Given FormFactor's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FormFactor is more favorable than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FormFactor has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has higher revenue and earnings than FormFactor. Teradyne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FormFactor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a net margin of 22.55% compared to FormFactor's net margin of 8.14%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat FormFactor's return on equity.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 30 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Teradyne and 15 mentions for KLA. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat KLA's score of 0.71 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Teradyne's return on equity.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne presently has a consensus price target of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 22.41%. KLA has a consensus price target of $342.44, suggesting a potential upside of 31.93%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Teradyne.