MKS (MKSI) Competitors

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of MKS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $470.13, indicating a potential upside of 4.59%. MKS has a consensus target price of $324.92, indicating a potential upside of 1.38%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than MKS.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MKS pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 32 more articles in the media than MKS. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Applied Materials and 38 mentions for MKS. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat MKS's score of 0.82 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to MKS's net margin of 8.06%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat MKS's return on equity.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MKS has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

MKS currently has a consensus price target of $324.92, indicating a potential upside of 1.38%. Cohu has a consensus price target of $49.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.84%. Given MKS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe MKS is more favorable than Cohu.

MKS has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohu has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, MKS had 22 more articles in the media than Cohu. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for MKS and 16 mentions for Cohu. MKS's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Cohu's score of 0.22 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

MKS has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Cohu's net margin of -11.54%. MKS's return on equity of 21.49% beat Cohu's return on equity.

99.8% of MKS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Cohu shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cohu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MKS had 31 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for MKS and 7 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat MKS's score of 0.82 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the media.

99.8% of MKS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Entegris shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of MKS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Entegris. MKS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Entegris has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MKS has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Entegris currently has a consensus target price of $154.33, suggesting a potential upside of 11.85%. MKS has a consensus target price of $324.92, suggesting a potential upside of 1.38%. Given Entegris' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Entegris is more favorable than MKS.

Entegris has a net margin of 8.18% compared to MKS's net margin of 8.06%. MKS's return on equity of 21.49% beat Entegris' return on equity.

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Entegris pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MKS pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MKS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

MKS has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to MKS's net margin of 8.06%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat MKS's return on equity.

In the previous week, MKS had 24 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for MKS and 14 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat MKS's score of 0.82 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

MKS presently has a consensus price target of $324.92, suggesting a potential upside of 1.38%. KLA has a consensus price target of $1,842.19, suggesting a potential downside of 4.30%. Given MKS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MKS is more favorable than KLA.

MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $9.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. MKS pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.