KLA (KLAC) Competitors

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $553.56, suggesting a potential downside of 14.96%. KLA has a consensus target price of $277.34, suggesting a potential upside of 4.19%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 74 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 97 mentions for Applied Materials and 23 mentions for KLA. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat KLA's score of 0.85 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Entegris' net margin of 8.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Entegris' return on equity.

KLA currently has a consensus price target of $277.34, indicating a potential upside of 4.19%. Entegris has a consensus price target of $156.56, indicating a potential downside of 5.23%. Given KLA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Entegris.

In the previous week, KLA had 9 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for KLA and 14 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat KLA's score of 0.85 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Entegris pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Entegris has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Entegris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Entegris. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 30.94%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Lam Research's return on equity.

KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 39 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 62 mentions for Lam Research and 23 mentions for KLA. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat KLA's score of 0.85 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

KLA currently has a consensus target price of $277.34, suggesting a potential upside of 4.19%. Lam Research has a consensus target price of $345.39, suggesting a potential downside of 11.72%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Lam Research.

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MKS currently has a consensus price target of $374.07, suggesting a potential downside of 9.00%. KLA has a consensus price target of $277.34, suggesting a potential upside of 4.19%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KLA is more favorable than MKS.

99.8% of MKS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to MKS's net margin of 8.06%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat MKS's return on equity.

In the previous week, KLA had 3 more articles in the media than MKS. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for KLA and 20 mentions for MKS. MKS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat KLA's score of 0.85 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

MKS has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. MKS pays out 20.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.