Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

$432.16 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$430.87 -1.29 (-0.30%)

As of 05/22/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

Should you buy Applied Materials stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Applied Materials with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Applied Materials include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Alphabet (GOOGL), Intel (INTC), and KLA (KLAC). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk and earnings.

71.3% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 99 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 180 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 81 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.96 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Advanced Micro Devices	116 Very Positive mention(s)	24 Positive mention(s)	23 Neutral mention(s)	10 Negative mention(s)	6 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	52 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.4, meaning that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Advanced Micro Devices' net margin of 13.37%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Advanced Micro Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Advanced Micro Devices	13.37%	9.55%	7.68%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advanced Micro Devices. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Micro Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Advanced Micro Devices	$34.64B	22.01	$4.34B	$3.05	153.28
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.09	$7.00B	$10.65	40.58

Advanced Micro Devices currently has a consensus target price of $410.00, suggesting a potential downside of 12.30%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $465.14, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Given Applied Materials' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Advanced Micro Devices.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Advanced Micro Devices	0 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	30 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Summary

Advanced Micro Devices beats Applied Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Broadcom pays out 50.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Broadcom has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Broadcom currently has a consensus target price of $448.10, suggesting a potential upside of 8.20%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $465.14, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Given Broadcom's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Broadcom has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

76.4% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Broadcom shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Broadcom had 55 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 136 mentions for Broadcom and 81 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.99 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Broadcom	114 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	52 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Broadcom has a net margin of 36.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Broadcom's return on equity of 38.61% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Broadcom	36.57%	38.61%	17.49%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Broadcom	$63.89B	30.69	$23.13B	$5.12	80.89
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.09	$7.00B	$10.65	40.58

Summary

Broadcom beats Applied Materials on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Alphabet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Alphabet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
Alphabet	37.92%	38.99%	27.41%

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $465.14, indicating a potential upside of 7.63%. Alphabet has a consensus target price of $412.65, indicating a potential upside of 7.75%. Given Alphabet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alphabet is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77
Alphabet	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	47 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.09	$7.00B	$10.65	40.58
Alphabet	$402.84B	11.52	$132.17B	$13.11	29.21

In the previous week, Alphabet had 209 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 290 mentions for Alphabet and 81 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Alphabet's score of 0.89 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	52 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alphabet	200 Very Positive mention(s)	16 Positive mention(s)	34 Neutral mention(s)	32 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Alphabet has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Alphabet beats Applied Materials on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Intel had 210 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 291 mentions for Intel and 81 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Intel's score of 0.82 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intel	169 Very Positive mention(s)	54 Positive mention(s)	33 Neutral mention(s)	27 Negative mention(s)	8 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	52 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Intel currently has a consensus price target of $81.52, suggesting a potential downside of 31.97%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $465.14, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Intel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intel	4 Sell rating(s)	25 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.22
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

Intel has a beta of 2.18, indicating that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intel. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intel	$52.85B	11.40	-$267M	-$0.62	N/A
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.09	$7.00B	$10.65	40.58

64.5% of Intel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Intel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Intel's net margin of -5.90%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Intel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intel	-5.90%	0.39%	0.23%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

Summary

Applied Materials beats Intel on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$12.16B	20.29	$4.06B	$35.33	53.45
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.09	$7.00B	$10.65	40.58

KLA pays an annual dividend of $9.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. KLA pays out 26.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	35.66%	91.89%	29.21%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA currently has a consensus price target of $1,842.19, suggesting a potential downside of 2.45%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $465.14, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.77

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 71 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 81 mentions for Applied Materials and 10 mentions for KLA. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat KLA's score of 0.70 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	52 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Applied Materials beats KLA on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Applied Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Applied Materials	ELEC COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$342.97B	$69.67B	$39.37B	$12.34B
Dividend Yield	0.49%	1.13%	3.20%	5.28%
P/E Ratio	40.58	89.81	79.19	25.66
Price / Sales	12.09	164.24	628.57	86.31
Price / Cash	42.81	271.49	48.72	56.67
Price / Book	14.34	9.11	10.54	7.14
Net Income	$7.00B	$853.38M	$1.07B	$335.98M
7 Day Performance	6.21%	13.83%	3.79%	4.15%
1 Month Performance	3.63%	24.90%	6.28%	2.54%
1 Year Performance	174.37%	324.85%	169.83%	35.06%

Applied Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMAT Applied Materials	4.549 of 5 stars	$432.16 flat	$465.14 +7.6%	+174.4%	$342.97B	$28.37B	40.58	36,500	Analyst Upgrade
AMD Advanced Micro Devices	3.5098 of 5 stars	$415.81 -2.0%	$396.95 -4.5%	+323.8%	$675.62B	$34.64B	135.85	31,000	Trending News
AVGO Broadcom	4.9191 of 5 stars	$418.30 -1.6%	$442.13 +5.7%	+81.1%	$1.98T	$63.89B	81.65	33,000	Positive News
GOOGL Alphabet	4.3587 of 5 stars	$400.85 +1.0%	$411.23 +2.6%	+127.3%	$4.86T	$402.84B	30.57	190,820	Trending News
INTC Intel	3.4079 of 5 stars	$106.04 -2.5%	$79.38 -25.1%	+497.7%	$532.12B	$52.85B	N/A	85,100	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMAT) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in AMD or AMAT?

Does the media favor AMD or AMAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMD or AMAT?

Is AMD or AMAT more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AMD or AMAT?

Do analysts recommend AMD or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Is AVGO or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer AVGO or AMAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, AVGO or AMAT?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AVGO or AMAT?

Does the media favor AVGO or AMAT?

Is AVGO or AMAT more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AVGO or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Do analysts rate AMAT or GOOGL?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMAT or GOOGL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AMAT or GOOGL?

Does the media favor AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Does the media favor INTC or AMAT?

Do analysts rate INTC or AMAT?

Which has more volatility and risk, INTC or AMAT?

Which has better valuation and earnings, INTC or AMAT?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of INTC or AMAT?

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, KLAC or AMAT?

Is KLAC or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Is KLAC or AMAT more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, KLAC or AMAT?

Do analysts prefer KLAC or AMAT?

Does the media favor KLAC or AMAT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in KLAC or AMAT?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools