Does the media prefer AMD or AMAT?

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 61 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 157 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Advanced Micro Devices' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Advanced Micro Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Advanced Micro Devices 111 Very Positive mention(s) 19 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 11 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 60 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 19 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMAT or AVGO?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 16.88 $7.00B $10.65 56.62 Broadcom $63.89B 26.84 $23.13B $6.00 60.08

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30% Broadcom 38.85% 41.61% 19.55%

Does the media favor AMAT or AVGO?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 17 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 113 mentions for Broadcom and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 60 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 19 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Broadcom 86 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 13 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GOOGL or AMAT?

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Alphabet $422.50B 10.32 $132.17B $13.11 27.45 Applied Materials $28.37B 16.88 $7.00B $10.65 56.62

Is GOOGL or AMAT more profitable?

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Alphabet 37.92% 38.99% 27.41% Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30%

Does the media refer more to GOOGL or AMAT?

In the previous week, Alphabet had 82 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 178 mentions for Alphabet and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Alphabet's score of 0.89 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Alphabet 125 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 20 Neutral mention(s) 15 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 60 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 19 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Intel's net margin of -5.90%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Intel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Intel -5.90% 0.39% 0.23% Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30%

Does the media refer more to INTC or AMAT?

In the previous week, Intel had 147 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 243 mentions for Intel and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Intel's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Intel is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intel 164 Very Positive mention(s) 29 Positive mention(s) 23 Neutral mention(s) 20 Negative mention(s) 7 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 60 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 19 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KLAC or AMAT?

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio KLA $12.16B 25.31 $4.06B $3.53 66.73 Applied Materials $28.37B 16.88 $7.00B $10.65 56.62

Is KLAC or AMAT more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets KLA 35.66% 91.89% 29.21% Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30%

Does the media favor KLAC or AMAT?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 65 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 96 mentions for Applied Materials and 31 mentions for KLA. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat KLA's score of 0.62 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment KLA 14 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 60 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 19 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

$603.04 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$607.20 +4.16 (+0.69%)

As of 07/2/2026 08:00 PM Eastern

Compare

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

Should you buy Applied Materials stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Applied Materials with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Applied Materials include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Alphabet (GOOGL), Intel (INTC), and KLA (KLAC). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

71.3% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.47, suggesting that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Advanced Micro Devices' net margin of 13.37%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Advanced Micro Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Advanced Micro Devices	13.37%	9.55%	7.68%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 61 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 157 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Advanced Micro Devices' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Advanced Micro Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Advanced Micro Devices	111 Very Positive mention(s)	19 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	11 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	60 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	19 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Advanced Micro Devices currently has a consensus price target of $448.78, indicating a potential downside of 13.33%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $553.56, indicating a potential downside of 8.20%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Advanced Micro Devices.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Advanced Micro Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	28 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advanced Micro Devices. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Micro Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Advanced Micro Devices	$37.45B	22.54	$4.34B	$3.05	169.78
Applied Materials	$28.37B	16.88	$7.00B	$10.65	56.62

Summary

Advanced Micro Devices beats Applied Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadcom pays out 43.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Broadcom has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $553.56, indicating a potential downside of 8.20%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $493.24, indicating a potential upside of 36.84%. Given Broadcom's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	29 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94

In the previous week, Broadcom had 17 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 113 mentions for Broadcom and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	60 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	19 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	86 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	16.88	$7.00B	$10.65	56.62
Broadcom	$63.89B	26.84	$23.13B	$6.00	60.08

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
Broadcom	38.85%	41.61%	19.55%

Summary

Broadcom beats Applied Materials on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

40.0% of Alphabet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.6% of Alphabet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Alphabet	37.92%	38.99%	27.41%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

Alphabet presently has a consensus price target of $413.54, indicating a potential upside of 14.90%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $553.56, indicating a potential downside of 8.20%. Given Alphabet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Alphabet is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Alphabet	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	47 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.94
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Alphabet has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Alphabet pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alphabet has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 82 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 178 mentions for Alphabet and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Alphabet's score of 0.89 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Alphabet	125 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	20 Neutral mention(s)	15 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	60 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	19 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Alphabet	$422.50B	10.32	$132.17B	$13.11	27.45
Applied Materials	$28.37B	16.88	$7.00B	$10.65	56.62

Summary

Alphabet beats Applied Materials on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Intel had 147 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 243 mentions for Intel and 96 mentions for Applied Materials. Intel's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.97 indicating that Intel is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intel	164 Very Positive mention(s)	29 Positive mention(s)	23 Neutral mention(s)	20 Negative mention(s)	7 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	60 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	19 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

64.5% of Intel shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Intel shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Intel's net margin of -5.90%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Intel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intel	-5.90%	0.39%	0.23%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

Intel presently has a consensus price target of $96.69, suggesting a potential downside of 19.66%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $553.56, suggesting a potential downside of 8.20%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Intel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intel	4 Sell rating(s)	28 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intel. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intel	$52.85B	11.44	-$267M	-$0.62	N/A
Applied Materials	$28.37B	16.88	$7.00B	$10.65	56.62

Intel has a beta of 2.18, suggesting that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Intel on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$12.16B	25.31	$4.06B	$3.53	66.73
Applied Materials	$28.37B	16.88	$7.00B	$10.65	56.62

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 65 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 96 mentions for Applied Materials and 31 mentions for KLA. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat KLA's score of 0.62 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	14 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	60 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	19 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. KLA pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

KLA currently has a consensus target price of $277.34, indicating a potential upside of 17.74%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $553.56, indicating a potential downside of 8.20%. Given KLA's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe KLA is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

KLA has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	35.66%	91.89%	29.21%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

Summary

KLA and Applied Materials tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Applied Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Applied Materials	ELEC COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$478.79B	$68.56B	$38.42B	$12.48B
Dividend Yield	0.35%	1.05%	3.17%	6.52%
P/E Ratio	56.62	85.01	78.93	24.70
Price / Sales	16.88	109.02	599.32	99.49
Price / Cash	59.74	191.02	45.62	57.09
Price / Book	20.03	8.60	9.55	6.46
Net Income	$7.00B	$854.67M	$1.07B	$337.01M
7 Day Performance	-3.80%	-2.14%	0.97%	1.69%
1 Month Performance	33.12%	-3.98%	0.23%	3.81%
1 Year Performance	215.95%	134.82%	143.56%	23.90%

Applied Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMAT Applied Materials	4.1848 of 5 stars	$603.04 flat	$553.56 -8.2%	+216.0%	$478.79B	$28.37B	56.62	36,500	Trending News Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision
AMD Advanced Micro Devices	3.369 of 5 stars	$532.74 +2.1%	$445.81 -16.3%	+275.4%	$867.70B	$37.45B	174.47	31,000	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision Gap Up
AVGO Broadcom	4.9952 of 5 stars	$372.97 +2.2%	$493.24 +32.2%	+31.1%	$1.77T	$63.89B	62.07	33,000	Trending News Analyst Upgrade Insider Trade Analyst Revision
GOOGL Alphabet	4.5222 of 5 stars	$352.49 +4.5%	$413.13 +17.2%	+101.0%	$4.27T	$422.50B	26.87	190,820	Trending News Analyst Forecast Insider Trade Analyst Revision
INTC Intel	3.2146 of 5 stars	$129.68 +1.1%	$93.93 -27.6%	+437.2%	$650.58B	$52.85B	N/A	85,100	Trending News Analyst Forecast Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMAT) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AMD or AMAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMD or AMAT?

Is AMD or AMAT more profitable?

Does the media prefer AMD or AMAT?

Do analysts recommend AMD or AMAT?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AMD or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Is AMAT or AVGO a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, AMAT or AVGO?

Do analysts prefer AMAT or AVGO?

Does the media favor AMAT or AVGO?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMAT or AVGO?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AMAT or AVGO?

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GOOGL or AMAT?

Is GOOGL or AMAT more profitable?

Do analysts prefer GOOGL or AMAT?

Which has more risk and volatility, GOOGL or AMAT?

Is GOOGL or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to GOOGL or AMAT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GOOGL or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Does the media refer more to INTC or AMAT?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in INTC or AMAT?

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Do analysts rate INTC or AMAT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, INTC or AMAT?

Which has more volatility and risk, INTC or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KLAC or AMAT?

Does the media favor KLAC or AMAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in KLAC or AMAT?

Is KLAC or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer KLAC or AMAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, KLAC or AMAT?

Is KLAC or AMAT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools