Does the media prefer AMD or AMAT?

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 120 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 206 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.86 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Advanced Micro Devices 114 Very Positive mention(s) 28 Positive mention(s) 34 Neutral mention(s) 16 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 42 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 21 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AMAT or AVGO?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 15.58 $7.00B $10.65 52.28 Broadcom $63.89B 31.23 $23.13B $6.00 69.90

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30% Broadcom 38.85% 41.61% 19.55%

Does the media prefer AMAT or AVGO?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 33 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 119 mentions for Broadcom and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.93 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 42 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 21 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Broadcom 88 Very Positive mention(s) 10 Positive mention(s) 17 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AMAT or GOOGL?

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 15.58 $7.00B $10.65 52.28 Alphabet $402.84B 10.50 $132.17B $19.91 17.38

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30% Alphabet 54.77% 51.32% 35.42%

Does the media favor AMAT or GOOGL?

In the previous week, Alphabet had 102 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 188 mentions for Alphabet and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Alphabet's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.93 indicating that Alphabet is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 42 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 21 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alphabet 131 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 27 Neutral mention(s) 14 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Intel's net margin of -19.79%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Intel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30% Intel -19.79% 2.62% 1.50%

Does the media prefer AMAT or INTC?

In the previous week, Intel had 155 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 241 mentions for Intel and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Intel's score of 0.83 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 42 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 21 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Intel 134 Very Positive mention(s) 34 Positive mention(s) 40 Neutral mention(s) 24 Negative mention(s) 8 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AMAT or KLAC?

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 15.58 $7.00B $10.65 52.28 KLA $13.58B 20.45 $4.83B $3.67 57.91

Is AMAT or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 29.31% 36.97% 21.30% KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23%

Does the media prefer AMAT or KLAC?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 56 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 86 mentions for Applied Materials and 30 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.93 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 42 Very Positive mention(s) 18 Positive mention(s) 21 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive KLA 23 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Live Earnings Conference Call: Applied Materials will host a live Q3 2026 earnings call on August 13, 2026 at 4:30PM ET. Get details.

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

$556.80 +8.65 (+1.58%)

As of 02:22 PM Eastern

Compare

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

Should you buy Applied Materials stock or one of its competitors? Applied Materials's main competitors and comparable companies include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Alphabet (GOOGL), Intel (INTC), and KLA (KLAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.48, suggesting that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Advanced Micro Devices' net margin of 15.58%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Advanced Micro Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Advanced Micro Devices	15.58%	12.30%	9.89%
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 120 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 206 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.86 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Advanced Micro Devices	114 Very Positive mention(s)	28 Positive mention(s)	34 Neutral mention(s)	16 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	42 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advanced Micro Devices. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Micro Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Advanced Micro Devices	$34.64B	23.12	$4.34B	$3.89	126.10
Applied Materials	$28.37B	15.58	$7.00B	$10.65	52.28

Advanced Micro Devices presently has a consensus price target of $546.87, suggesting a potential upside of 11.49%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $603.23, suggesting a potential upside of 8.34%. Given Advanced Micro Devices' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Advanced Micro Devices is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Advanced Micro Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	31 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

71.3% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Advanced Micro Devices beats Applied Materials on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadcom pays out 43.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Broadcom has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	15.58	$7.00B	$10.65	52.28
Broadcom	$63.89B	31.23	$23.13B	$6.00	69.90

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $603.23, indicating a potential upside of 8.34%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $493.24, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Given Broadcom's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	28 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Broadcom has a net margin of 38.85% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Broadcom's return on equity of 41.61% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
Broadcom	38.85%	41.61%	19.55%

In the previous week, Broadcom had 33 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 119 mentions for Broadcom and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.93 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	42 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	88 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	17 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Broadcom beats Applied Materials on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $603.23, indicating a potential upside of 8.34%. Alphabet has a consensus target price of $419.86, indicating a potential upside of 21.35%. Given Alphabet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alphabet is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Alphabet	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	44 Buy rating(s)	5 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	15.58	$7.00B	$10.65	52.28
Alphabet	$402.84B	10.50	$132.17B	$19.91	17.38

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Alphabet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Alphabet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Alphabet has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 102 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 188 mentions for Alphabet and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Alphabet's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.93 indicating that Alphabet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	42 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alphabet	131 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	27 Neutral mention(s)	14 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
Alphabet	54.77%	51.32%	35.42%

Summary

Alphabet beats Applied Materials on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $603.23, suggesting a potential upside of 8.34%. Intel has a consensus price target of $107.85, suggesting a potential upside of 2.18%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Intel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Intel	2 Sell rating(s)	32 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.30

In the previous week, Intel had 155 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 241 mentions for Intel and 86 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Intel's score of 0.83 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	42 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Intel	134 Very Positive mention(s)	34 Positive mention(s)	40 Neutral mention(s)	24 Negative mention(s)	8 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.31% compared to Intel's net margin of -19.79%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 36.97% beat Intel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
Intel	-19.79%	2.62%	1.50%

Applied Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Intel. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	15.58	$7.00B	$10.65	52.28
Intel	$52.85B	10.07	-$267M	-$2.11	N/A

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of Intel shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Intel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Intel on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $603.23, indicating a potential upside of 8.34%. KLA has a consensus price target of $223.70, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	15.58	$7.00B	$10.65	52.28
KLA	$13.58B	20.45	$4.83B	$3.67	57.91

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 29.31%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	29.31%	36.97%	21.30%
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Applied Materials pays out 19.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 56 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 86 mentions for Applied Materials and 30 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.93 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	42 Very Positive mention(s)	18 Positive mention(s)	21 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
KLA	23 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

KLA beats Applied Materials on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Applied Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Applied Materials	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$442.55B	$107.79B	$30.57B	$13.08B
Dividend Yield	0.40%	1.51%	2.73%	10.74%
P/E Ratio	52.34	90.28	75.34	25.22
Price / Sales	15.58	98.47	599.49	105.23
Price / Cash	52.07	67.78	51.85	50.58
Price / Book	21.72	11.42	9.45	6.25
Net Income	$7.00B	$1.86B	$681.78M	$347.70M
7 Day Performance	5.56%	5.60%	2.69%	1.87%
1 Month Performance	-3.23%	2.46%	2.65%	1.03%
1 Year Performance	193.00%	128.79%	198.15%	19.90%

Applied Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMAT Applied Materials	4.68 of 5 stars	$558.65 +1.9%	$603.23 +8.0%	+190.9%	$443.70B	$28.37B	52.47	36,500	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
AMD Advanced Micro Devices	4.1652 of 5 stars	$475.93 -1.5%	$546.87 +14.9%	+176.0%	$777.18B	$34.64B	122.38	31,000	Trending News Analyst Revision
AVGO Broadcom	4.9955 of 5 stars	$423.36 -1.0%	$493.24 +16.5%	+33.0%	$2.01T	$63.89B	70.54	33,000	Trending News Analyst Revision
GOOGL Alphabet	4.8949 of 5 stars	$354.43 +0.0%	$419.86 +18.5%	+68.9%	$4.33T	$402.84B	17.79	190,820	Trending News Analyst Downgrade Analyst Revision
INTC Intel	2.709 of 5 stars	$99.34 -2.3%	$107.93 +8.6%	+362.9%	$502.57B	$52.85B	N/A	85,100	Trending News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMAT) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMD or AMAT?

Is AMD or AMAT more profitable?

Does the media prefer AMD or AMAT?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AMD or AMAT?

Do analysts prefer AMD or AMAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AMD or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Which has more risk and volatility, AMAT or AVGO?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AMAT or AVGO?

Is AMAT or AVGO a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, AMAT or AVGO?

Do analysts recommend AMAT or AVGO?

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Does the media prefer AMAT or AVGO?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Which has more volatility and risk, AMAT or GOOGL?

Do analysts recommend AMAT or GOOGL?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, AMAT or GOOGL?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Do analysts rate AMAT or INTC?

Does the media prefer AMAT or INTC?

Is AMAT or INTC more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AMAT or INTC?

Which has more volatility & risk, AMAT or INTC?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AMAT or INTC?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Do analysts prefer AMAT or KLAC?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AMAT or KLAC?

Is AMAT or KLAC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AMAT or KLAC?

Is AMAT or KLAC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer AMAT or KLAC?

Which has more volatility and risk, AMAT or KLAC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools