S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
S&P 500   3,768.25 (-0.72%)
DOW   30,814.26 (-0.57%)
QQQ   311.86 (-0.79%)
AAPL   127.14 (-1.37%)
MSFT   212.65 (-0.17%)
FB   251.36 (+2.33%)
GOOGL   1,727.62 (-0.19%)
AMZN   3,104.25 (-0.74%)
TSLA   826.16 (-2.23%)
NVDA   514.38 (-2.58%)
BABA   243.46 (+0.20%)
CGC   33.39 (-3.55%)
GE   11.33 (-2.83%)
MU   80.72 (-0.71%)
AMD   88.21 (-2.84%)
T   29.17 (-0.41%)
NIO   56.27 (-7.56%)
F   9.83 (-3.34%)
ACB   12.04 (+0.67%)
BA   204.32 (-2.66%)
DIS   171.44 (-1.15%)
NFLX   497.98 (-0.58%)
GILD   63.33 (+1.49%)
Log in
NASDAQ:AMAT

Applied Materials Competitors

$103.14
-2.66 (-2.51 %)
(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$101.15
Now: $103.14
$105.42
50-Day Range
$82.48
MA: $88.61
$105.80
52-Week Range
$36.64
Now: $103.14
$106.60
Volume8.22 million shs
Average Volume8.46 million shs
Market Capitalization$94.31 billion
P/E Ratio26.31
Dividend Yield0.83%
Beta1.48

Competitors

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) Vs. LRCX, KLAC, ENTG, MKSI, BRKS, and CCMP

Should you be buying AMAT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "semiconductor equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to Applied Materials, including Lam Research (LRCX), KLA (KLAC), Entegris (ENTG), MKS Instruments (MKSI), Brooks Automation (BRKS), and CMC Materials (CCMP).

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Dividends

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Lam Research pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lam Research and Applied Materials' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research$10.04 billion7.85$2.25 billion$15.9534.33
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.48$3.62 billion$4.1724.73

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Lam Research and Applied Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lam Research042202.85
Applied Materials051702.77

Lam Research currently has a consensus target price of $412.1538, indicating a potential downside of 24.72%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $88.3043, indicating a potential downside of 14.38%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Lam Research.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

84.0% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lam Research and Applied Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lam Research23.60%55.82%20.06%
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%

Summary

Lam Research beats Applied Materials on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Dividends

KLA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. KLA pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares KLA and Applied Materials' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KLA$5.81 billion8.09$1.22 billion$10.3529.38
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.48$3.62 billion$4.1724.73

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares KLA and Applied Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KLA21.76%65.49%18.66%
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of KLA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

KLA has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for KLA and Applied Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KLA071102.61
Applied Materials051702.77

KLA currently has a consensus target price of $231.6111, indicating a potential downside of 23.84%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $88.3043, indicating a potential downside of 14.38%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Summary

KLA beats Applied Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Dividends

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Entegris pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Entegris and Applied Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Entegris$1.59 billion9.13$254.86 million$1.9355.74
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.48$3.62 billion$4.1724.73

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Entegris. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Entegris and Applied Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Entegris15.03%26.54%12.06%
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Entegris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Entegris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Entegris has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Entegris and Applied Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Entegris02502.71
Applied Materials051702.77

Entegris currently has a consensus price target of $88.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.19%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $88.3043, indicating a potential downside of 14.38%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Entegris.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Entegris on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

MKS Instruments (NASDAQ:MKSI) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Dividends

MKS Instruments pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. MKS Instruments pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MKS Instruments and Applied Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MKS Instruments$1.90 billion5.15$140.39 million$4.5239.29
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.48$3.62 billion$4.1724.73

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than MKS Instruments. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares MKS Instruments and Applied Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MKS Instruments12.78%16.49%9.74%
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.0% of MKS Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of MKS Instruments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for MKS Instruments and Applied Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MKS Instruments02902.82
Applied Materials051702.77

MKS Instruments currently has a consensus price target of $159.70, indicating a potential downside of 10.08%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $88.3043, indicating a potential downside of 14.38%. Given MKS Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MKS Instruments is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Summary

Applied Materials beats MKS Instruments on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brooks Automation (NASDAQ:BRKS) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Dividends

Brooks Automation pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Brooks Automation pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Brooks Automation and Applied Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Brooks Automation02602.75
Applied Materials051702.77

Brooks Automation currently has a consensus price target of $64.8750, indicating a potential downside of 16.54%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $88.3043, indicating a potential downside of 14.38%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Brooks Automation.

Volatility and Risk

Brooks Automation has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its share price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Brooks Automation and Applied Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brooks Automation$897.27 million6.43$64.85 million$1.2661.69
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.48$3.62 billion$4.1724.73

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Brooks Automation. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Brooks Automation and Applied Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Brooks Automation7.23%7.95%6.13%
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.3% of Brooks Automation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Brooks Automation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Brooks Automation on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and risk.

Dividends

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 23.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and CMC Materials has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Applied Materials and CMC Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Materials051702.77
CMC Materials43301.90

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $88.3043, indicating a potential downside of 14.38%. CMC Materials has a consensus price target of $147.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.43%. Given CMC Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CMC Materials is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Risk & Volatility

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Applied Materials and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.48$3.62 billion$4.1724.73
CMC Materials$1.12 billion4.29$142.83 million$7.4722.05

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Applied Materials beats CMC Materials on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ad Stansberry
Do This BEFORE Biden Takes the White House
Surprisingly, only roughly 10% of people in the U.S. have made this move... yet it’s already created tens of thousands of millionaires. And with Biden and company about to occupy the White House, this could prove to be the #1 most important financial step you take between now and January 20th.

Applied Materials Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Lam Research logo
LRCX
Lam Research
2.2$547.53-1.9%$78.85 billion$10.04 billion31.06
KLA logo
KLAC
KLA
2.2$304.13-0.1%$46.98 billion$5.81 billion37.00Analyst Upgrade
Entegris logo
ENTG
Entegris
2.0$107.57-1.0%$14.52 billion$1.59 billion55.16Dividend Announcement
MKS Instruments logo
MKSI
MKS Instruments
2.3$177.60-0.1%$9.79 billion$1.90 billion35.45Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Heavy News Reporting
Brooks Automation logo
BRKS
Brooks Automation
2.2$77.73-2.5%$5.77 billion$897.27 million88.33
CMC Materials logo
CCMP
CMC Materials
1.6$164.68-1.8%$4.79 billion$1.12 billion34.10Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Advanced Energy Industries logo
AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries
1.7$115.47-1.9%$4.42 billion$788.95 million42.77
Amkor Technology logo
AMKR
Amkor Technology
1.9$18.04-3.9%$4.37 billion$4.05 billion14.09Decrease in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
FormFactor logo
FORM
FormFactor
1.5$48.82-1.5%$3.78 billion$589.46 million49.31
Onto Innovation logo
ONTO
Onto Innovation
1.5$55.65-2.5%$2.72 billion$305.90 million-309.17Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
Xperi logo
XPER
Xperi
1.6$21.48-2.0%$2.27 billion$280.07 million-37.03
Cohu logo
COHU
Cohu
1.5$45.22-2.3%$1.90 billion$583.33 million-40.74Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Ultra Clean logo
UCTT
Ultra Clean
1.5$40.03-0.5%$1.62 billion$1.07 billion80.06Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
Axcelis Technologies logo
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies
1.7$34.92-6.5%$1.17 billion$342.96 million26.26Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
Veeco Instruments logo
VECO
Veeco Instruments
1.4$19.93-4.3%$988.77 million$419.35 million-17.79Unusual Options Activity
PDF Solutions logo
PDFS
PDF Solutions
1.4$22.59-2.8%$827.47 million$85.58 million-118.89Heavy News Reporting
Photronics logo
PLAB
Photronics
1.9$11.96-3.2%$785.01 million$550.66 million20.61Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
AXT logo
AXTI
AXT
1.3$11.59-6.6%$478.67 million$83.26 million-386.20Unusual Options Activity
Heavy News Reporting
Rubicon Technology logo
RBCN
Rubicon Technology
0.5$9.99-0.7%$24.20 million$3.53 million-34.45
This page was last updated on 1/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.