Does the media prefer AMAT or AMD?

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 128 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 223 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 1.18 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 77 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Advanced Micro Devices 173 Very Positive mention(s) 19 Positive mention(s) 17 Neutral mention(s) 12 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, AMAT or AVGO?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 12.19 $7.00B $11.60 37.58 Broadcom $63.89B 26.60 $23.13B $6.00 59.53

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Broadcom's return on equity of 50.76% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% Broadcom 42.94% 50.76% 24.29%

Does the media prefer AMAT or AVGO?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 216 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 311 mentions for Broadcom and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Broadcom's score of 1.19 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 77 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Broadcom 219 Very Positive mention(s) 21 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 22 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AMAT or GOOGL?

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 12.19 $7.00B $11.60 37.58 Alphabet $402.84B 10.40 $132.17B $19.91 17.20

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% Alphabet 54.77% 51.32% 35.42%

Does the media refer more to AMAT or GOOGL?

In the previous week, Alphabet had 88 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 183 mentions for Alphabet and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Alphabet's score of 0.82 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 77 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alphabet 115 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 21 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Intel's net margin of -19.79%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Intel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Intel -19.79% 2.62% 1.50% Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09%

Does the media favor INTC or AMAT?

In the previous week, Intel had 172 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 267 mentions for Intel and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Intel's score of 1.28 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intel 221 Very Positive mention(s) 9 Positive mention(s) 27 Neutral mention(s) 6 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 77 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMAT or KLAC?

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 12.19 $7.00B $11.60 37.58 KLA $13.58B 16.64 $4.83B $3.67 47.12

Is AMAT or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23%

Does the media refer more to AMAT or KLAC?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 58 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 95 mentions for Applied Materials and 37 mentions for KLA. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat KLA's score of 1.19 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 77 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive KLA 29 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

$435.91 -2.55 (-0.58%)

As of 09/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

Should you buy Applied Materials stock or one of its competitors? Applied Materials's main competitors and comparable companies include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Alphabet (GOOGL), Intel (INTC), and KLA (KLAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Advanced Micro Devices' net margin of 15.58%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Advanced Micro Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
Advanced Micro Devices	15.58%	12.30%	9.89%

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.3% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $658.45, suggesting a potential upside of 51.05%. Advanced Micro Devices has a consensus target price of $553.72, suggesting a potential upside of 21.39%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Advanced Micro Devices.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Advanced Micro Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	32 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Applied Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Advanced Micro Devices. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Micro Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.19	$7.00B	$11.60	37.58
Advanced Micro Devices	$34.64B	21.50	$4.34B	$3.89	117.26

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 128 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 223 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 1.18 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	77 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Advanced Micro Devices	173 Very Positive mention(s)	19 Positive mention(s)	17 Neutral mention(s)	12 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Applied Materials beats Advanced Micro Devices on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Broadcom had 216 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 311 mentions for Broadcom and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Broadcom's score of 1.19 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	77 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	219 Very Positive mention(s)	21 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	22 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Broadcom's return on equity of 50.76% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
Broadcom	42.94%	50.76%	24.29%

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadcom pays out 43.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Broadcom has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.19	$7.00B	$11.60	37.58
Broadcom	$63.89B	26.60	$23.13B	$6.00	59.53

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $658.45, suggesting a potential upside of 51.05%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $501.77, suggesting a potential upside of 40.49%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Broadcom.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	31 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Summary

Broadcom beats Applied Materials on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Alphabet has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Alphabet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Alphabet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 88 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 183 mentions for Alphabet and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Alphabet's score of 0.82 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	77 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alphabet	115 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	21 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 51.05%. Alphabet has a consensus price target of $420.19, indicating a potential upside of 22.69%. Given Applied Materials' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Alphabet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Alphabet	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	45 Buy rating(s)	5 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.02

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
Alphabet	54.77%	51.32%	35.42%

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.19	$7.00B	$11.60	37.58
Alphabet	$402.84B	10.40	$132.17B	$19.91	17.20

Summary

Alphabet beats Applied Materials on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Intel has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

64.5% of Intel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Intel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Intel's net margin of -19.79%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Intel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intel	-19.79%	2.62%	1.50%
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intel. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intel	$52.85B	8.75	-$267M	-$2.11	N/A
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.19	$7.00B	$11.60	37.58

Intel currently has a consensus price target of $107.46, indicating a potential upside of 17.22%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 51.05%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Intel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intel	3 Sell rating(s)	31 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.28
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, Intel had 172 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 267 mentions for Intel and 95 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Intel's score of 1.28 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intel	221 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	27 Neutral mention(s)	6 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	77 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Applied Materials beats Intel on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus price target of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 51.05%. KLA has a consensus price target of $222.22, indicating a potential upside of 28.49%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	12.19	$7.00B	$11.60	37.58
KLA	$13.58B	16.64	$4.83B	$3.67	47.12

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 58 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 95 mentions for Applied Materials and 37 mentions for KLA. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat KLA's score of 1.19 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	77 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
KLA	29 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Applied Materials beats KLA on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Applied Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Applied Materials	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$347.96B	$106.96B	$29.51B	$12.73B
Dividend Yield	0.48%	1.62%	2.73%	8.86%
P/E Ratio	37.58	71.94	75.80	25.38
Price / Sales	12.19	89.30	591.98	92.60
Price / Cash	43.43	60.74	47.32	52.26
Price / Book	13.50	9.36	9.29	6.14
Net Income	$7.00B	$1.85B	$678.51M	$349.01M
7 Day Performance	-5.58%	-1.48%	-0.88%	-0.27%
1 Month Performance	-20.25%	-6.36%	-1.07%	0.68%
1 Year Performance	175.47%	95.36%	185.83%	14.84%

Applied Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMAT Applied Materials	4.9898 of 5 stars	$435.91 -0.6%	$658.45 +51.1%	+179.0%	$347.96B	$28.37B	37.58	36,500	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
AMD Advanced Micro Devices	4.1923 of 5 stars	$468.89 +0.7%	$553.72 +18.1%	+181.4%	$765.45B	$34.64B	120.54	31,000	Trending News Analyst Downgrade
AVGO Broadcom	5 of 5 stars	$370.71 +0.5%	$491.97 +32.7%	+18.1%	$1.76T	$63.89B	61.79	33,000	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast Gap Down
GOOGL Alphabet	4.5772 of 5 stars	$338.58 -2.3%	$420.19 +24.1%	+48.5%	$4.14T	$402.84B	17.01	190,820	Trending News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
INTC Intel	4.298 of 5 stars	$89.90 +0.5%	$107.46 +19.5%	+282.0%	$453.46B	$52.85B	N/A	85,100	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMAT) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Is AMAT or AMD more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AMAT or AMD?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMAT or AMD?

Do analysts prefer AMAT or AMD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AMAT or AMD?

Does the media prefer AMAT or AMD?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Does the media prefer AMAT or AVGO?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AMAT or AVGO?

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, AMAT or AVGO?

Is AMAT or AVGO a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AMAT or AVGO?

Do analysts prefer AMAT or AVGO?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Is AMAT or GOOGL a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AMAT or GOOGL?

Does the media refer more to AMAT or GOOGL?

Do analysts rate AMAT or GOOGL?

Which has more volatility and risk, AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AMAT or GOOGL?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Which has more risk and volatility, INTC or AMAT?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in INTC or AMAT?

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, INTC or AMAT?

Do analysts prefer INTC or AMAT?

Does the media favor INTC or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Which has more volatility & risk, AMAT or KLAC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in AMAT or KLAC?

Do analysts rate AMAT or KLAC?

Is AMAT or KLAC more profitable?

Is AMAT or KLAC a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, AMAT or KLAC?

Does the media refer more to AMAT or KLAC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools