Does the media refer more to AMD or AMAT?

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 131 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 173 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.67 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Advanced Micro Devices 74 Very Positive mention(s) 45 Positive mention(s) 38 Neutral mention(s) 14 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 20 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, AMAT or AVGO?

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 13.27 $7.00B $11.60 40.89 Broadcom $89.10B 19.02 $23.13B $7.83 45.34

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% Broadcom 42.94% 48.33% 23.78%

Does the media favor AMAT or AVGO?

In the previous week, Broadcom had 38 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 80 mentions for Broadcom and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 20 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Broadcom 52 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AMAT or GOOGL?

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Applied Materials $28.37B 13.27 $7.00B $11.60 40.89 Alphabet $402.84B 10.26 $132.17B $19.91 16.97

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09% Alphabet 54.77% 51.32% 35.42%

Does the media refer more to AMAT or GOOGL?

In the previous week, Alphabet had 140 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 182 mentions for Alphabet and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Alphabet's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that Alphabet is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Applied Materials 20 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Alphabet 121 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 27 Neutral mention(s) 25 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Intel's net margin of -19.79%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Intel's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Intel -19.79% 2.62% 1.50% Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09%

Does the media favor INTC or AMAT?

In the previous week, Intel had 157 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 199 mentions for Intel and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Intel's score of 0.76 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intel 111 Very Positive mention(s) 40 Positive mention(s) 27 Neutral mention(s) 14 Negative mention(s) 6 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 20 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KLAC or AMAT?

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio KLA $13.58B 18.07 $4.83B $3.67 51.19 Applied Materials $28.37B 13.27 $7.00B $11.60 40.89

Is KLAC or AMAT more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Applied Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23% Applied Materials 30.05% 38.02% 22.09%

Does the media prefer KLAC or AMAT?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 27 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Applied Materials and 15 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment KLA 11 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 20 Very Positive mention(s) 11 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

$474.38 +1.92 (+0.41%)

Closing price 09/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$462.68 -11.70 (-2.47%)

As of 04:45 AM Eastern

Compare

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

Should you buy Applied Materials stock or one of its competitors? Applied Materials's main competitors and comparable companies include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Broadcom (AVGO), Alphabet (GOOGL), Intel (INTC), and KLA (KLAC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Advanced Micro Devices' net margin of 15.58%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Advanced Micro Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Advanced Micro Devices	15.58%	12.30%	9.89%
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 131 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 173 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.67 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Advanced Micro Devices	74 Very Positive mention(s)	45 Positive mention(s)	38 Neutral mention(s)	14 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	20 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advanced Micro Devices. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Micro Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Advanced Micro Devices	$34.64B	28.97	$4.34B	$3.89	158.00
Applied Materials	$28.37B	13.27	$7.00B	$11.60	40.89

Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.48, suggesting that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

71.3% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Advanced Micro Devices currently has a consensus target price of $565.13, indicating a potential downside of 8.05%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 38.80%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Advanced Micro Devices.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Advanced Micro Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	33 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.81
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Summary

Applied Materials beats Advanced Micro Devices on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadcom pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Broadcom has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Broadcom is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Broadcom had 38 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 80 mentions for Broadcom and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Broadcom's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that Broadcom is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	20 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Broadcom	52 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $658.45, suggesting a potential upside of 38.80%. Broadcom has a consensus price target of $509.04, suggesting a potential upside of 43.39%. Given Broadcom's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Broadcom	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	28 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.4% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Broadcom shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Broadcom has a net margin of 42.94% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Broadcom's return on equity of 48.33% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
Broadcom	42.94%	48.33%	23.78%

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	13.27	$7.00B	$11.60	40.89
Broadcom	$89.10B	19.02	$23.13B	$7.83	45.34

Summary

Broadcom beats Applied Materials on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $658.45, indicating a potential upside of 38.80%. Alphabet has a consensus price target of $422.16, indicating a potential upside of 24.96%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Alphabet.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Alphabet	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	45 Buy rating(s)	5 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.02

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Alphabet has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Applied Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Alphabet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Alphabet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 140 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 182 mentions for Alphabet and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Alphabet's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that Alphabet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Applied Materials	20 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Alphabet	121 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	27 Neutral mention(s)	25 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Alphabet has a net margin of 54.77% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Alphabet's return on equity of 51.32% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%
Alphabet	54.77%	51.32%	35.42%

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Materials. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials	$28.37B	13.27	$7.00B	$11.60	40.89
Alphabet	$402.84B	10.26	$132.17B	$19.91	16.97

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alphabet beats Applied Materials on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Intel has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Intel currently has a consensus target price of $108.49, suggesting a potential downside of 11.50%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $658.45, suggesting a potential upside of 38.80%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Intel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intel	3 Sell rating(s)	26 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Applied Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Intel. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intel	$52.85B	11.70	-$267M	-$2.11	N/A
Applied Materials	$28.37B	13.27	$7.00B	$11.60	40.89

Applied Materials has a net margin of 30.05% compared to Intel's net margin of -19.79%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 38.02% beat Intel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intel	-19.79%	2.62%	1.50%
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%

64.5% of Intel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Intel shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Intel had 157 more articles in the media than Applied Materials. MarketBeat recorded 199 mentions for Intel and 42 mentions for Applied Materials. Applied Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Intel's score of 0.76 indicating that Applied Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intel	111 Very Positive mention(s)	40 Positive mention(s)	27 Neutral mention(s)	14 Negative mention(s)	6 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	20 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Applied Materials beats Intel on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

KLA presently has a consensus price target of $222.22, suggesting a potential upside of 18.29%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $658.45, suggesting a potential upside of 38.80%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$13.58B	18.07	$4.83B	$3.67	51.19
Applied Materials	$28.37B	13.27	$7.00B	$11.60	40.89

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 27 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Applied Materials and 15 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.81 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	11 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	20 Very Positive mention(s)	11 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%

KLA has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

KLA beats Applied Materials on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Applied Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMAT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Applied Materials	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$374.94B	$118.62B	$31.38B	$13.29B
Dividend Yield	0.45%	1.62%	2.75%	12.57%
P/E Ratio	40.89	84.25	78.98	25.69
Price / Sales	13.27	93.10	590.46	79.71
Price / Cash	46.80	65.77	49.70	52.76
Price / Book	14.69	10.77	8.01	6.32
Net Income	$7.00B	$2.06B	$702.96M	$359.73M
7 Day Performance	13.65%	5.43%	1.41%	0.17%
1 Month Performance	-2.03%	4.67%	-1.06%	-3.27%
1 Year Performance	135.49%	80.72%	178.57%	5.58%

Applied Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMAT Applied Materials	4.8866 of 5 stars	$474.38 +0.4%	$658.45 +38.8%	+136.2%	$374.94B	$28.37B	40.89	36,500	Trending News
AMD Advanced Micro Devices	2.867 of 5 stars	$606.85 +8.4%	$565.13 -6.9%	+282.0%	$990.97B	$34.64B	156.05	31,000	Trending News
AVGO Broadcom	4.996 of 5 stars	$359.57 +0.5%	$509.04 +41.6%	+4.7%	$1.72T	$89.10B	45.96	33,000	Trending News Ex-Dividend
GOOGL Alphabet	4.7389 of 5 stars	$355.57 +1.7%	$422.16 +18.7%	+34.2%	$4.35T	$402.84B	17.86	190,820	Trending News Analyst Revision
INTC Intel	3.3543 of 5 stars	$121.73 +12.1%	$108.49 -10.9%	+317.9%	$614.08B	$52.85B	N/A	85,100	Trending News Analyst Revision

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMAT) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Applied Materials (AMAT) Competitors

AMAT vs. AMD, AVGO, GOOGL, INTC, and KLAC

How does Applied Materials compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Is AMD or AMAT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to AMD or AMAT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, AMD or AMAT?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMD or AMAT?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AMD or AMAT?

Do analysts rate AMD or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Broadcom?

Is AMAT or AVGO a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor AMAT or AVGO?

Do analysts recommend AMAT or AVGO?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMAT or AVGO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AMAT or AVGO?

Is AMAT or AVGO more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, AMAT or AVGO?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Alphabet?

Do analysts recommend AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AMAT or GOOGL?

Does the media refer more to AMAT or GOOGL?

Is AMAT or GOOGL more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AMAT or GOOGL?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMAT or GOOGL?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to Intel?

Which has more risk & volatility, INTC or AMAT?

Do analysts recommend INTC or AMAT?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, INTC or AMAT?

Is INTC or AMAT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of INTC or AMAT?

Does the media favor INTC or AMAT?

Summary

How does Applied Materials compare to KLA?

Do analysts prefer KLAC or AMAT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KLAC or AMAT?

Does the media prefer KLAC or AMAT?

Is KLAC or AMAT more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, KLAC or AMAT?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in KLAC or AMAT?

Is KLAC or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMAT vs. The Competition

Applied Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools