Does the media prefer LRCX or AMAT?

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 87 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 171 mentions for Applied Materials and 84 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.69 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lam Research 61 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Applied Materials 74 Very Positive mention(s) 31 Positive mention(s) 37 Neutral mention(s) 17 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to AMD or LRCX?

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 106 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 190 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 84 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.94 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Advanced Micro Devices 103 Very Positive mention(s) 30 Positive mention(s) 27 Neutral mention(s) 21 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lam Research 61 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LRCX or KLAC?

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lam Research $23.23B 18.52 $7.27B $5.76 59.69 KLA $13.58B 19.80 $4.83B $3.67 56.07

Is LRCX or KLAC more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 31.27%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Lam Research's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48% KLA 35.57% 87.66% 29.23%

Does the media favor LRCX or KLAC?

In the previous week, Lam Research had 62 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Lam Research and 22 mentions for KLA. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat KLA's score of 0.74 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lam Research 61 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive KLA 12 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, META or LRCX?

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Meta Platforms $200.97B 7.21 $60.46B $26.55 21.43 Lam Research $23.23B 18.52 $7.27B $5.76 59.69

Is META or LRCX more profitable?

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Meta Platforms' net margin of 29.83%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Meta Platforms' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Meta Platforms 29.83% 33.18% 20.07% Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48%

Does the media refer more to META or LRCX?

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 68 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 152 mentions for Meta Platforms and 84 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.68 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Meta Platforms 87 Very Positive mention(s) 10 Positive mention(s) 20 Neutral mention(s) 25 Negative mention(s) 6 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lam Research 61 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, LRCX or MKSI?

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. MKS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lam Research $23.23B 18.52 $7.27B $5.76 59.69 MKS $3.93B 5.52 $295M $6.27 51.15

Is LRCX or MKSI more profitable?

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to MKS's net margin of 10.15%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat MKS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lam Research 31.27% 67.60% 33.48% MKS 10.15% 24.72% 7.80%

Does the media prefer LRCX or MKSI?

In the previous week, Lam Research had 73 more articles in the media than MKS. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Lam Research and 11 mentions for MKS. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat MKS's score of 0.97 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lam Research 61 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MKS 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Lam Research (LRCX) Competitors

$343.84 +11.48 (+3.45%)

Closing price 08/17/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$328.00 -15.84 (-4.61%)

As of 06:14 AM Eastern

Compare

LRCX vs. AMAT, AMD, KLAC, META, and MKSI

Should you buy Lam Research stock or one of its competitors? Lam Research's main competitors and comparable companies include Applied Materials (AMAT), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), KLA (KLAC), Meta Platforms (META), and MKS (MKSI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Lam Research compare to Applied Materials?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Lam Research has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Applied Materials. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$23.23B	18.52	$7.27B	$5.76	59.69
Applied Materials	$28.37B	14.98	$7.00B	$11.60	46.15

Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Applied Materials' net margin of 30.05%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Applied Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%
Applied Materials	30.05%	38.02%	22.09%

Lam Research presently has a consensus price target of $358.47, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $640.17, indicating a potential upside of 19.59%. Given Applied Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Applied Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Applied Materials has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 87 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 171 mentions for Applied Materials and 84 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.69 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	61 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Applied Materials	74 Very Positive mention(s)	31 Positive mention(s)	37 Neutral mention(s)	17 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lam Research beats Applied Materials on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lam Research compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) and Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Advanced Micro Devices' net margin of 15.58%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Advanced Micro Devices' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Advanced Micro Devices	15.58%	12.30%	9.89%
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%

Advanced Micro Devices presently has a consensus price target of $546.87, indicating a potential upside of 8.08%. Lam Research has a consensus price target of $358.47, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Advanced Micro Devices' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Advanced Micro Devices is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Advanced Micro Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	31 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, Advanced Micro Devices had 106 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 190 mentions for Advanced Micro Devices and 84 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Advanced Micro Devices' score of 0.94 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Advanced Micro Devices	103 Very Positive mention(s)	30 Positive mention(s)	27 Neutral mention(s)	21 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lam Research	61 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lam Research has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advanced Micro Devices. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advanced Micro Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Advanced Micro Devices	$34.64B	23.85	$4.34B	$3.89	130.08
Lam Research	$23.23B	18.52	$7.27B	$5.76	59.69

71.3% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Advanced Micro Devices shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Advanced Micro Devices beats Lam Research on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lam Research compare to KLA?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 62 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Lam Research and 22 mentions for KLA. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat KLA's score of 0.74 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	61 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
KLA	12 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$23.23B	18.52	$7.27B	$5.76	59.69
KLA	$13.58B	19.80	$4.83B	$3.67	56.07

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and KLA has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 31.27%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Lam Research's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%
KLA	35.57%	87.66%	29.23%

Lam Research presently has a consensus price target of $358.47, suggesting a potential upside of 4.26%. KLA has a consensus price target of $223.70, suggesting a potential upside of 8.72%. Given KLA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.72

Summary

Lam Research beats KLA on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lam Research compare to Meta Platforms?

Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) and Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than Lam Research. Meta Platforms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Meta Platforms	$200.97B	7.21	$60.46B	$26.55	21.43
Lam Research	$23.23B	18.52	$7.27B	$5.76	59.69

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Meta Platforms' net margin of 29.83%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Meta Platforms' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Meta Platforms	29.83%	33.18%	20.07%
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%

Meta Platforms presently has a consensus price target of $785.32, indicating a potential upside of 38.02%. Lam Research has a consensus price target of $358.47, indicating a potential upside of 4.26%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Meta Platforms	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	35 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 68 more articles in the media than Lam Research. MarketBeat recorded 152 mentions for Meta Platforms and 84 mentions for Lam Research. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.68 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Meta Platforms	87 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	20 Neutral mention(s)	25 Negative mention(s)	6 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lam Research	61 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Meta Platforms pays out 7.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Meta Platforms is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 13.5% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Meta Platforms beats Lam Research on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lam Research compare to MKS?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and MKS (NASDAQ:MKSI) are both large-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. MKS pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Lam Research pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MKS pays out 15.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. MKS is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of MKS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of MKS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. MKS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$23.23B	18.52	$7.27B	$5.76	59.69
MKS	$3.93B	5.52	$295M	$6.27	51.15

In the previous week, Lam Research had 73 more articles in the media than MKS. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Lam Research and 11 mentions for MKS. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat MKS's score of 0.97 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	61 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MKS	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lam Research has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MKS has a beta of 1.98, indicating that its share price is 98% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to MKS's net margin of 10.15%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat MKS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	31.27%	67.60%	33.48%
MKS	10.15%	24.72%	7.80%

Lam Research presently has a consensus price target of $358.47, suggesting a potential upside of 4.26%. MKS has a consensus price target of $385.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.03%. Given MKS's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MKS is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
MKS	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88

Summary

Lam Research beats MKS on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lam Research News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LRCX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LRCX vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lam Research	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$415.89B	$113.40B	$30.57B	$13.06B
Dividend Yield	0.31%	1.52%	2.72%	10.62%
P/E Ratio	59.69	97.50	75.32	25.39
Price / Sales	18.52	110.16	598.14	92.24
Price / Cash	53.46	69.25	53.35	38.47
Price / Book	34.49	11.98	8.36	6.51
Net Income	$7.27B	$1.85B	$679.85M	$347.22M
7 Day Performance	10.41%	5.03%	0.95%	1.27%
1 Month Performance	9.75%	8.74%	4.63%	2.72%
1 Year Performance	247.73%	142.60%	200.12%	21.85%

Lam Research Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LRCX Lam Research	4.6838 of 5 stars	$343.84 +3.5%	$358.47 +4.3%	+245.5%	$415.89B	$23.23B	59.69	23,300	Positive News
AMAT Applied Materials	4.9057 of 5 stars	$527.48 -1.3%	$603.23 +14.4%	+230.9%	$424.16B	$28.37B	49.53	36,500	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Upgrade Gap Up
AMD Advanced Micro Devices	3.9999 of 5 stars	$489.28 +1.5%	$542.53 +10.9%	+185.1%	$786.03B	$34.64B	125.78	31,000	Trending News Analyst Downgrade
KLAC KLA	4.5895 of 5 stars	$193.22 +0.2%	$223.70 +15.8%	+135.2%	$251.85B	$13.58B	52.69	15,200
META Meta Platforms	4.9876 of 5 stars	$589.90 +0.2%	$785.32 +33.1%	-27.5%	$1.49T	$200.97B	22.22	78,865	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LRCX) was last updated on 8/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lam Research (LRCX) Competitors

LRCX vs. AMAT, AMD, KLAC, META, and MKSI

How does Lam Research compare to Applied Materials?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to KLA?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to Meta Platforms?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to MKS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LRCX vs. The Competition

Lam Research Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lam Research (LRCX) Competitors

LRCX vs. AMAT, AMD, KLAC, META, and MKSI

How does Lam Research compare to Applied Materials?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LRCX or AMAT?

Which has more volatility & risk, LRCX or AMAT?

Is LRCX or AMAT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend LRCX or AMAT?

Is LRCX or AMAT a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer LRCX or AMAT?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in LRCX or AMAT?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to Advanced Micro Devices?

Is AMD or LRCX more profitable?

Do analysts recommend AMD or LRCX?

Does the media refer more to AMD or LRCX?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AMD or LRCX?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AMD or LRCX?

Which has more volatility & risk, AMD or LRCX?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to KLA?

Does the media favor LRCX or KLAC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LRCX or KLAC?

Is LRCX or KLAC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, LRCX or KLAC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LRCX or KLAC?

Is LRCX or KLAC more profitable?

Do analysts rate LRCX or KLAC?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to Meta Platforms?

Which has more volatility and risk, META or LRCX?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, META or LRCX?

Is META or LRCX more profitable?

Do analysts rate META or LRCX?

Does the media refer more to META or LRCX?

Is META or LRCX a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of META or LRCX?

Summary

How does Lam Research compare to MKS?

Is LRCX or MKSI a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LRCX or MKSI?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LRCX or MKSI?

Does the media prefer LRCX or MKSI?

Which has more volatility & risk, LRCX or MKSI?

Is LRCX or MKSI more profitable?

Do analysts prefer LRCX or MKSI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LRCX vs. The Competition

Lam Research Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools