Micron Technology Competitors

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Micron Technology and NVIDIA's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NVIDIA has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Micron Technology. Micron Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Micron Technology and NVIDIA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.4% of Micron Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Micron Technology and NVIDIA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Micron Technology currently has a consensus price target of $84.7419, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $548.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 6.62%. Given NVIDIA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Micron Technology.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Micron Technology on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Micron Technology and Intel's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Intel has higher revenue and earnings than Micron Technology. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Micron Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Micron Technology and Intel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.4% of Micron Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Intel shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Intel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Micron Technology and Intel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Micron Technology currently has a consensus price target of $84.7419, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Intel has a consensus price target of $60.2368, suggesting a potential upside of 4.61%. Given Micron Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Intel.

Summary

Micron Technology beats Intel on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Micron Technology and Broadcom's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Micron Technology. Broadcom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Micron Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Micron Technology and Broadcom's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.4% of Micron Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Broadcom shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Micron Technology and Broadcom, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Micron Technology currently has a consensus price target of $84.7419, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Broadcom has a consensus price target of $417.8148, suggesting a potential downside of 6.29%. Given Micron Technology's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Broadcom.

Summary

Broadcom beats Micron Technology on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) and Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.4% of Micron Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Texas Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Micron Technology and Texas Instruments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Micron Technology currently has a consensus price target of $84.7419, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Texas Instruments has a consensus price target of $152.4074, suggesting a potential downside of 9.92%. Given Micron Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Texas Instruments.

Risk and Volatility

Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Micron Technology and Texas Instruments' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Texas Instruments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Micron Technology. Micron Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Micron Technology and Texas Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats Micron Technology on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) and Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.9% of Analog Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Micron Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Analog Devices and Micron Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

Analog Devices currently has a consensus price target of $143.48, suggesting a potential downside of 9.05%. Micron Technology has a consensus price target of $84.7419, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Given Micron Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Analog Devices.

Volatility and Risk

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Analog Devices and Micron Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Micron Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Analog Devices. Micron Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Analog Devices and Micron Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Analog Devices beats Micron Technology on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Microchip Technology (NASDAQ:MCHP) and Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.1% of Microchip Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Micron Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Microchip Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Microchip Technology and Micron Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

Microchip Technology currently has a consensus price target of $132.9583, suggesting a potential downside of 10.50%. Micron Technology has a consensus price target of $84.7419, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Given Micron Technology's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Microchip Technology.

Volatility and Risk

Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Microchip Technology and Micron Technology's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Micron Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Microchip Technology. Microchip Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Micron Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Microchip Technology and Micron Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Microchip Technology beats Micron Technology on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.