S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:ONTO

Onto Innovation Competitors

$57.99
-5.58 (-8.78 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$57.43
Now: $57.99
$63.50
50-Day Range
$54.05
MA: $59.97
$66.27
52-Week Range
$20.32
Now: $57.99
$66.95
Volume550,044 shs
Average Volume367,620 shs
Market Capitalization$2.83 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.28

Competitors

Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) Vs. AMAT, LRCX, KLAC, ENTG, MKSI, and BRKS

Should you be buying ONTO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "semiconductor equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to Onto Innovation, including Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), KLA (KLAC), Entegris (ENTG), MKS Instruments (MKSI), and Brooks Automation (BRKS).

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Applied Materials and Onto Innovation's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials$17.20 billion5.77$3.62 billion$4.1725.96
Onto Innovation$305.90 million9.27$1.91 million$1.3941.72

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Onto Innovation. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Onto Innovation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Applied Materials and Onto Innovation, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Materials041802.82
Onto Innovation00403.00

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $125.7391, suggesting a potential upside of 16.17%. Onto Innovation has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.43%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Onto Innovation.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and Onto Innovation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%

Volatility & Risk

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Onto Innovation on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) and Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Onto Innovation and Lam Research's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Onto Innovation$305.90 million9.27$1.91 million$1.3941.72
Lam Research$10.04 billion7.52$2.25 billion$15.9533.15

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Onto Innovation. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Onto Innovation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.0% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Onto Innovation and Lam Research, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Onto Innovation00403.00
Lam Research042102.84

Onto Innovation currently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.43%. Lam Research has a consensus target price of $478.88, suggesting a potential downside of 9.44%. Given Onto Innovation's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Onto Innovation is more favorable than Lam Research.

Profitability

This table compares Onto Innovation and Lam Research's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%
Lam Research23.60%55.82%20.06%

Risk and Volatility

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lam Research beats Onto Innovation on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Onto Innovation and KLA's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Onto Innovation$305.90 million9.27$1.91 million$1.3941.72
KLA$5.81 billion7.63$1.22 billion$10.3527.79

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Onto Innovation. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Onto Innovation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Onto Innovation and KLA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Onto Innovation00403.00
KLA081002.56

Onto Innovation currently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.43%. KLA has a consensus target price of $272.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.43%. Given Onto Innovation's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Onto Innovation is more favorable than KLA.

Profitability

This table compares Onto Innovation and KLA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%
KLA21.76%65.49%18.66%

Risk and Volatility

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

KLA beats Onto Innovation on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) and Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Onto Innovation and Entegris' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Onto Innovation$305.90 million9.27$1.91 million$1.3941.72
Entegris$1.59 billion8.24$254.86 million$1.9350.37

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than Onto Innovation. Onto Innovation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Entegris shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Entegris shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Onto Innovation and Entegris, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Onto Innovation00403.00
Entegris02502.71

Onto Innovation currently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.43%. Entegris has a consensus target price of $100.7778, suggesting a potential upside of 3.66%. Given Entegris' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Entegris is more favorable than Onto Innovation.

Profitability

This table compares Onto Innovation and Entegris' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%
Entegris15.03%26.54%12.06%

Risk and Volatility

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Entegris has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Entegris beats Onto Innovation on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) and MKS Instruments (NASDAQ:MKSI) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Onto Innovation and MKS Instruments' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Onto Innovation$305.90 million9.27$1.91 million$1.3941.72
MKS Instruments$1.90 billion4.38$140.39 million$4.5233.35

MKS Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Onto Innovation. MKS Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Onto Innovation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of MKS Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of MKS Instruments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Onto Innovation and MKS Instruments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Onto Innovation00403.00
MKS Instruments02802.80

Onto Innovation currently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.43%. MKS Instruments has a consensus target price of $180.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.40%. Given MKS Instruments' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MKS Instruments is more favorable than Onto Innovation.

Profitability

This table compares Onto Innovation and MKS Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%
MKS Instruments12.78%16.49%9.74%

Risk and Volatility

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

MKS Instruments beats Onto Innovation on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Onto Innovation (NYSE:ONTO) and Brooks Automation (NASDAQ:BRKS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Onto Innovation and Brooks Automation's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Onto Innovation$305.90 million9.27$1.91 million$1.3941.72
Brooks Automation$897.27 million6.33$64.85 million$1.2660.71

Brooks Automation has higher revenue and earnings than Onto Innovation. Onto Innovation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.5% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Brooks Automation shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Onto Innovation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Brooks Automation shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Onto Innovation and Brooks Automation, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Onto Innovation00403.00
Brooks Automation02602.75

Onto Innovation currently has a consensus target price of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.43%. Brooks Automation has a consensus target price of $79.3750, suggesting a potential upside of 3.76%. Given Brooks Automation's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brooks Automation is more favorable than Onto Innovation.

Profitability

This table compares Onto Innovation and Brooks Automation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Onto Innovation-1.27%6.32%5.48%
Brooks Automation7.23%7.95%6.13%

Risk and Volatility

Onto Innovation has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brooks Automation has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Brooks Automation beats Onto Innovation on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Onto Innovation Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Applied Materials logo
AMAT
Applied Materials
2.4$108.24-6.7%$99.33 billion$17.20 billion27.61
Lam Research logo
LRCX
Lam Research
2.3$528.81-4.2%$75.57 billion$10.04 billion29.99Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
KLA logo
KLAC
KLA
2.2$287.62-5.6%$44.32 billion$5.81 billion34.99
Entegris logo
ENTG
Entegris
1.8$97.22-4.7%$13.12 billion$1.59 billion49.86
MKS Instruments logo
MKSI
MKS Instruments
2.6$150.76-5.3%$8.33 billion$1.90 billion30.09Increase in Short Interest
Brooks Automation logo
BRKS
Brooks Automation
1.9$76.50-7.0%$5.68 billion$897.27 million86.93
Amkor Technology logo
AMKR
Amkor Technology
1.9$20.75-7.2%$5.05 billion$4.05 billion16.21Gap Down
CMC Materials logo
CCMP
CMC Materials
1.6$162.54-5.1%$4.74 billion$1.12 billion33.65Dividend Increase
News Coverage
Advanced Energy Industries logo
AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries
2.2$99.99-5.3%$3.83 billion$788.95 million37.03
FormFactor logo
FORM
FormFactor
1.7$41.21-6.9%$3.20 billion$589.46 million41.63
Xperi logo
XPER
Xperi
1.6$21.98-0.1%$2.30 billion$280.07 million-37.90Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Ultra Clean logo
UCTT
Ultra Clean
1.7$43.64-8.0%$1.77 billion$1.07 billion40.41Gap Up
Cohu logo
COHU
Cohu
1.7$39.47-6.1%$1.67 billion$583.33 million-35.56Gap Up
Axcelis Technologies logo
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies
2.0$35.78-7.5%$1.21 billion$342.96 million26.90Insider Selling
Veeco Instruments logo
VECO
Veeco Instruments
1.4$21.29-2.7%$1.06 billion$419.35 million-24.75
Photronics logo
PLAB
Photronics
1.9$11.48-1.9%$728.02 million$609.69 million21.66Analyst Report
PDF Solutions logo
PDFS
PDF Solutions
1.6$17.65-2.2%$646.52 million$85.58 million-70.60
AXT logo
AXTI
AXT
1.7$11.57-10.4%$477.84 million$83.26 million-385.54
Rubicon Technology logo
RBCN
Rubicon Technology
0.5$10.00-0.6%$24.22 million$3.53 million-41.67
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.