Ultra Clean Competitors

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Ultra Clean (NASDAQ:UCTT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Ultra Clean shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ultra Clean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Applied Materials and Ultra Clean, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus target price of $143.3750, suggesting a potential upside of 3.21%. Ultra Clean has a consensus target price of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Applied Materials' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Ultra Clean.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Applied Materials and Ultra Clean's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Ultra Clean. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultra Clean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and Ultra Clean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultra Clean has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Ultra Clean on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and Ultra Clean (NASDAQ:UCTT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.0% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Ultra Clean shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ultra Clean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Lam Research and Ultra Clean, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Lam Research presently has a consensus target price of $518.1304, suggesting a potential downside of 21.73%. Ultra Clean has a consensus target price of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Ultra Clean's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ultra Clean is more favorable than Lam Research.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lam Research and Ultra Clean's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Ultra Clean. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultra Clean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Lam Research and Ultra Clean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultra Clean has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lam Research beats Ultra Clean on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Ultra Clean (NASDAQ:UCTT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Ultra Clean shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ultra Clean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for KLA and Ultra Clean, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

KLA presently has a consensus target price of $282.9333, suggesting a potential downside of 19.81%. Ultra Clean has a consensus target price of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Ultra Clean's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ultra Clean is more favorable than KLA.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares KLA and Ultra Clean's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Ultra Clean. KLA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultra Clean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

KLA has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultra Clean has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares KLA and Ultra Clean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

KLA beats Ultra Clean on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and Ultra Clean (NASDAQ:UCTT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Entegris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Ultra Clean shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Entegris shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ultra Clean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Entegris and Ultra Clean, as reported by MarketBeat.

Entegris presently has a consensus target price of $100.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 17.02%. Ultra Clean has a consensus target price of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Ultra Clean's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ultra Clean is more favorable than Entegris.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Entegris and Ultra Clean's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than Ultra Clean. Ultra Clean is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Entegris has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultra Clean has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Entegris and Ultra Clean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Entegris beats Ultra Clean on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

MKS Instruments (NASDAQ:MKSI) and Ultra Clean (NASDAQ:UCTT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.0% of MKS Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Ultra Clean shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of MKS Instruments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ultra Clean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for MKS Instruments and Ultra Clean, as reported by MarketBeat.

MKS Instruments presently has a consensus target price of $180.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.99%. Ultra Clean has a consensus target price of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given MKS Instruments' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe MKS Instruments is more favorable than Ultra Clean.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MKS Instruments and Ultra Clean's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MKS Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Ultra Clean. MKS Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ultra Clean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultra Clean has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MKS Instruments and Ultra Clean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MKS Instruments beats Ultra Clean on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brooks Automation (NASDAQ:BRKS) and Ultra Clean (NASDAQ:UCTT) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.3% of Brooks Automation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Ultra Clean shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Brooks Automation shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ultra Clean shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Brooks Automation and Ultra Clean, as reported by MarketBeat.

Brooks Automation presently has a consensus target price of $81.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 14.45%. Ultra Clean has a consensus target price of $49.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Ultra Clean's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ultra Clean is more favorable than Brooks Automation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Brooks Automation and Ultra Clean's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Brooks Automation has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ultra Clean. Ultra Clean is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Brooks Automation has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ultra Clean has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Brooks Automation and Ultra Clean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ultra Clean beats Brooks Automation on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.