Free Trial

Hubbell (HUBB) Competitors

Hubbell logo
$483.79 -2.19 (-0.45%)
Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$485.50 +1.71 (+0.35%)
As of 07:37 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HUBB vs. AME, AYI, ETN, FIX, and IR

Should you buy Hubbell stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hubbell with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hubbell include AMETEK (AME), Acuity (AYI), Eaton (ETN), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), and Ingersoll Rand (IR).

How does Hubbell compare to AMETEK?

AMETEK (NYSE:AME) and Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

AMETEK has a net margin of 20.11% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 15.10%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat AMETEK's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AMETEK20.11% 16.63% 11.06%
Hubbell 15.10%27.09%12.82%

In the previous week, AMETEK had 15 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for AMETEK and 4 mentions for Hubbell. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat AMETEK's score of 0.92 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AMETEK
9 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hubbell
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

AMETEK pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. AMETEK pays out 20.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AMETEK has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Hubbell has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

AMETEK currently has a consensus target price of $252.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.08%. Hubbell has a consensus target price of $546.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.91%. Given Hubbell's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hubbell is more favorable than AMETEK.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AMETEK
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79
Hubbell
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AMETEK$7.40B7.16$1.48B$6.6234.94
Hubbell$6.00B4.29$887.10M$16.9328.58

87.4% of AMETEK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of AMETEK shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AMETEK has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hubbell has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

AMETEK beats Hubbell on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Acuity?

Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) and Acuity (NYSE:AYI) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Hubbell currently has a consensus target price of $546.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.91%. Acuity has a consensus target price of $369.17, indicating a potential upside of 30.09%. Given Acuity's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Acuity is more favorable than Hubbell.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hubbell
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Acuity
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Acuity shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Acuity shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Acuity's net margin of 9.37%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Acuity's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hubbell15.10% 27.09% 12.82%
Acuity 9.37%20.74%12.20%

In the previous week, Hubbell had 1 more articles in the media than Acuity. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hubbell and 3 mentions for Acuity. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Acuity's score of 0.51 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hubbell
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Acuity
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hubbell has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acuity has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Acuity pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acuity pays out 5.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Acuity has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hubbell has higher revenue and earnings than Acuity. Acuity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hubbell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hubbell$6.00B4.29$887.10M$16.9328.58
Acuity$4.35B1.98$396.60M$13.6420.80

Summary

Hubbell beats Acuity on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Eaton?

Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Eaton had 21 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Eaton and 4 mentions for Hubbell. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Eaton's score of 1.07 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hubbell
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eaton
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Eaton's net margin of 13.99%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hubbell15.10% 27.09% 12.82%
Eaton 13.99%24.72%10.69%

Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Eaton shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Eaton shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hubbell$6.00B4.29$887.10M$16.9328.58
Eaton$27.45B5.76$4.09B$10.2339.81

Hubbell currently has a consensus target price of $546.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.91%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $420.95, indicating a potential upside of 3.36%. Given Hubbell's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hubbell is more favorable than Eaton.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hubbell
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Eaton
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86

Summary

Hubbell beats Eaton on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) and Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Hubbell has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 38 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 4 mentions for Hubbell. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Comfort Systems USA's score of 1.24 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hubbell
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Comfort Systems USA
32 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.07%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Hubbell's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hubbell15.10% 27.09% 12.82%
Comfort Systems USA 12.07%51.69%20.21%

Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Comfort Systems USA has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hubbell$6.00B4.29$887.10M$16.9328.58
Comfort Systems USA$9.10B7.86$1.02B$34.6658.67

Hubbell presently has a consensus target price of $546.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.91%. Comfort Systems USA has a consensus target price of $1,923.20, indicating a potential downside of 5.42%. Given Hubbell's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hubbell is more favorable than Comfort Systems USA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hubbell
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Comfort Systems USA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Hubbell on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Ingersoll Rand?

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ingersoll Rand pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ingersoll Rand presently has a consensus target price of $93.38, indicating a potential upside of 30.93%. Hubbell has a consensus target price of $546.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.91%. Given Ingersoll Rand's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ingersoll Rand is more favorable than Hubbell.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ingersoll Rand
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Hubbell
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

In the previous week, Ingersoll Rand had 5 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Ingersoll Rand and 4 mentions for Hubbell. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Ingersoll Rand's score of 0.43 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ingersoll Rand
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hubbell
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 7.54%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ingersoll Rand7.54% 12.79% 7.16%
Hubbell 15.10%27.09%12.82%

Hubbell has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingersoll Rand$7.65B3.65$581.40M$1.4848.19
Hubbell$6.00B4.29$887.10M$16.9328.58

95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Hubbell shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hubbell shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hubbell has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Hubbell beats Ingersoll Rand on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hubbell News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HUBB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HUBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HUBB vs. The Competition

MetricHubbellMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$25.72B$11.15B$9.32B$22.95B
Dividend Yield1.16%1.18%3.57%4.06%
P/E Ratio28.5814.2924.8528.29
Price / Sales4.291.725,374.0924.50
Price / Cash21.8847.0827.9225.11
Price / Book6.813.664.784.73
Net Income$887.10M$353.37M$792.39M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.79%-2.57%0.19%-1.11%
1 Month Performance-11.33%-4.56%3.61%1.36%
1 Year Performance25.64%20.14%38.17%24.41%

Hubbell Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HUBB
Hubbell
4.4249 of 5 stars
$483.79
-0.5%
$546.25
+12.9%
+24.7%$25.72B$6.00B28.5818,000
AME
AMETEK
4.3413 of 5 stars
$230.27
-0.1%
$252.33
+9.6%
+28.2%$52.75B$7.40B34.7822,500
AYI
Acuity
4.7377 of 5 stars
$285.63
-1.3%
$369.17
+29.2%
+3.6%$8.66B$4.35B20.9413,800
ETN
Eaton
4.3966 of 5 stars
$422.44
-0.7%
$396.50
-6.1%
+23.1%$163.90B$27.45B40.3997,000
FIX
Comfort Systems USA
4.0116 of 5 stars
$1,891.64
+1.3%
$1,923.20
+1.7%
+336.2%$66.59B$10.14B54.5822,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:HUBB) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners