Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AME or HUBB?

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AMETEK $7.40B 7.33 $1.48B $6.62 35.75 Hubbell $5.84B 4.42 $887.10M $16.93 28.89

Is AME or HUBB more profitable?

AMETEK has a net margin of 20.11% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 15.10%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat AMETEK's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets AMETEK 20.11% 16.63% 11.06% Hubbell 15.10% 27.09% 12.82%

Does the media refer more to AME or HUBB?

In the previous week, Hubbell had 2 more articles in the media than AMETEK. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Hubbell and 12 mentions for AMETEK. AMETEK's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Hubbell's score of 1.04 indicating that AMETEK is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AMETEK 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hubbell 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HUBB or EME?

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hubbell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hubbell $5.84B 4.42 $887.10M $16.93 28.89 EMCOR Group $16.99B 1.94 $1.27B $29.81 24.87

Is HUBB or EME more profitable?

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.54%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Hubbell's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hubbell 15.10% 27.09% 12.82% EMCOR Group 7.54% 35.19% 13.68%

Does the media refer more to HUBB or EME?

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 2 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for EMCOR Group and 14 mentions for Hubbell. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Hubbell's score of 1.04 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hubbell 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive EMCOR Group 15 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ETN or HUBB?

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eaton $27.45B 5.67 $4.09B $10.23 39.15 Hubbell $5.84B 4.42 $887.10M $16.93 28.89

Is ETN or HUBB more profitable?

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Eaton's net margin of 13.99%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Eaton's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Eaton 13.99% 24.72% 10.69% Hubbell 15.10% 27.09% 12.82%

Does the media prefer ETN or HUBB?

In the previous week, Eaton had 12 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Eaton and 14 mentions for Hubbell. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Eaton's score of 0.70 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Eaton 11 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hubbell 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor FIX or HUBB?

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 14 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 14 mentions for Hubbell. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Hubbell's score of 1.04 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Comfort Systems USA 20 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hubbell 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is IR or HUBB more profitable?

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 7.54%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ingersoll Rand 7.54% 12.79% 7.16% Hubbell 15.10% 27.09% 12.82%

Does the media prefer IR or HUBB?

In the previous week, Hubbell had 2 more articles in the media than Ingersoll Rand. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Hubbell and 12 mentions for Ingersoll Rand. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Ingersoll Rand's score of 0.86 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ingersoll Rand 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hubbell 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Hubbell (HUBB) Competitors

$489.18 +7.14 (+1.48%)

Closing price 07/17/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$488.66 -0.52 (-0.11%)

As of 07/17/2026 05:54 PM Eastern

Compare

HUBB vs. AME, EME, ETN, FIX, and IR

Should you buy Hubbell stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hubbell with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hubbell include AMETEK (AME), EMCOR Group (EME), Eaton (ETN), Comfort Systems USA (FIX), and Ingersoll Rand (IR).

How does Hubbell compare to AMETEK?

AMETEK (NYSE:AME) and Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

87.4% of AMETEK shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of AMETEK shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

AMETEK has a net margin of 20.11% compared to Hubbell's net margin of 15.10%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat AMETEK's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AMETEK	20.11%	16.63%	11.06%
Hubbell	15.10%	27.09%	12.82%

AMETEK pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. AMETEK pays out 20.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AMETEK has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Hubbell has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

AMETEK has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hubbell has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hubbell had 2 more articles in the media than AMETEK. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Hubbell and 12 mentions for AMETEK. AMETEK's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Hubbell's score of 1.04 indicating that AMETEK is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AMETEK	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hubbell	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AMETEK	$7.40B	7.33	$1.48B	$6.62	35.75
Hubbell	$5.84B	4.42	$887.10M	$16.93	28.89

AMETEK currently has a consensus price target of $256.29, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Hubbell has a consensus price target of $554.38, indicating a potential upside of 13.33%. Given Hubbell's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hubbell is more favorable than AMETEK.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AMETEK	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Hubbell	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Summary

AMETEK beats Hubbell on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to EMCOR Group?

Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) and EMCOR Group (NYSE:EME) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

EMCOR Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. EMCOR Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hubbell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hubbell	$5.84B	4.42	$887.10M	$16.93	28.89
EMCOR Group	$16.99B	1.94	$1.27B	$29.81	24.87

Hubbell has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Hubbell presently has a consensus price target of $554.38, suggesting a potential upside of 13.33%. EMCOR Group has a consensus price target of $871.25, suggesting a potential upside of 17.53%. Given EMCOR Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EMCOR Group is more favorable than Hubbell.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hubbell	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
EMCOR Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to EMCOR Group's net margin of 7.54%. EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.19% beat Hubbell's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hubbell	15.10%	27.09%	12.82%
EMCOR Group	7.54%	35.19%	13.68%

Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. EMCOR Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years and EMCOR Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, EMCOR Group had 2 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for EMCOR Group and 14 mentions for Hubbell. EMCOR Group's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Hubbell's score of 1.04 indicating that EMCOR Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hubbell	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
EMCOR Group	15 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

88.2% of Hubbell shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of EMCOR Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Hubbell shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of EMCOR Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

EMCOR Group beats Hubbell on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Eaton?

Eaton (NYSE:ETN) and Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eaton	$27.45B	5.67	$4.09B	$10.23	39.15
Hubbell	$5.84B	4.42	$887.10M	$16.93	28.89

Eaton has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hubbell has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Eaton's net margin of 13.99%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Eaton's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eaton	13.99%	24.72%	10.69%
Hubbell	15.10%	27.09%	12.82%

Eaton presently has a consensus target price of $423.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.61%. Hubbell has a consensus target price of $554.38, indicating a potential upside of 13.33%. Given Hubbell's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hubbell is more favorable than Eaton.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eaton	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Hubbell	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

In the previous week, Eaton had 12 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Eaton and 14 mentions for Hubbell. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Eaton's score of 0.70 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Eaton	11 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hubbell	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

83.0% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Hubbell shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Eaton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hubbell shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Eaton pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Hubbell beats Eaton on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Comfort Systems USA?

Comfort Systems USA (NYSE:FIX) and Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Comfort Systems USA pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Comfort Systems USA has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Hubbell has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

96.5% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Comfort Systems USA shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Comfort Systems USA has higher revenue and earnings than Hubbell. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comfort Systems USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Comfort Systems USA	$9.10B	6.45	$1.02B	$34.66	48.10
Hubbell	$5.84B	4.42	$887.10M	$16.93	28.89

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hubbell has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12.07%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 51.69% beat Hubbell's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Comfort Systems USA	12.07%	51.69%	20.21%
Hubbell	15.10%	27.09%	12.82%

Comfort Systems USA currently has a consensus price target of $2,015.43, indicating a potential upside of 20.88%. Hubbell has a consensus price target of $554.38, indicating a potential upside of 13.33%. Given Comfort Systems USA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Comfort Systems USA is more favorable than Hubbell.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Comfort Systems USA	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Hubbell	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

In the previous week, Comfort Systems USA had 14 more articles in the media than Hubbell. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Comfort Systems USA and 14 mentions for Hubbell. Comfort Systems USA's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Hubbell's score of 1.04 indicating that Comfort Systems USA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Comfort Systems USA	20 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hubbell	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Comfort Systems USA beats Hubbell on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hubbell compare to Ingersoll Rand?

Ingersoll Rand (NYSE:IR) and Hubbell (NYSE:HUBB) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Ingersoll Rand currently has a consensus price target of $92.71, suggesting a potential upside of 12.67%. Hubbell has a consensus price target of $554.38, suggesting a potential upside of 13.33%. Given Hubbell's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hubbell is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ingersoll Rand	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Hubbell	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Hubbell has a net margin of 15.10% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 7.54%. Hubbell's return on equity of 27.09% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ingersoll Rand	7.54%	12.79%	7.16%
Hubbell	15.10%	27.09%	12.82%

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hubbell has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hubbell had 2 more articles in the media than Ingersoll Rand. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Hubbell and 12 mentions for Ingersoll Rand. Hubbell's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Ingersoll Rand's score of 0.86 indicating that Hubbell is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ingersoll Rand	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hubbell	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Hubbell pays an annual dividend of $5.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Ingersoll Rand pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hubbell pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hubbell has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years. Hubbell is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Hubbell shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Hubbell shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hubbell has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ingersoll Rand. Hubbell is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ingersoll Rand	$7.65B	4.21	$581.40M	$1.48	55.60
Hubbell	$5.84B	4.42	$887.10M	$16.93	28.89

Summary

Hubbell beats Ingersoll Rand on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hubbell News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HUBB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HUBB vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hubbell	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$25.47B	$10.68B	$9.44B	$23.48B
Dividend Yield	1.18%	0.77%	3.52%	4.15%
P/E Ratio	28.89	14.45	26.89	30.94
Price / Sales	4.42	1.70	1,959.48	19.11
Price / Cash	21.70	46.01	27.42	32.65
Price / Book	6.75	3.64	4.40	4.75
Net Income	$887.10M	$353.37M	$791.21M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.49%	-3.12%	-0.28%	-0.01%
1 Month Performance	-6.73%	-14.38%	-1.10%	1.08%
1 Year Performance	13.54%	2.45%	14.41%	16.61%

Hubbell Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HUBB Hubbell	4.4863 of 5 stars	$489.18 +1.5%	$554.38 +13.3%	+11.9%	$25.47B	$5.84B	28.89	18,000	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Downgrade Gap Down
AME AMETEK	4.4979 of 5 stars	$232.05 -0.8%	$256.29 +10.4%	+31.7%	$53.63B	$7.40B	35.05	22,500	News Coverage
EME EMCOR Group	4.6324 of 5 stars	$764.32 -2.2%	$871.25 +14.0%	+32.5%	$34.74B	$16.99B	25.64	44,000	News Coverage Positive News Gap Down
ETN Eaton	4.5181 of 5 stars	$402.66 -1.1%	$423.00 +5.1%	+5.3%	$158.15B	$27.45B	39.36	97,000	Trending News
FIX Comfort Systems USA	4.9186 of 5 stars	$1,730.63 -1.4%	$2,015.43 +16.5%	+202.2%	$61.82B	$9.10B	49.93	22,700	Positive News Upcoming Earnings Analyst Downgrade Analyst Revision Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HUBB) was last updated on 7/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hubbell (HUBB) Competitors