Acuity Brands Competitors

Eaton (NYSE:ETN) and Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.9% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Acuity Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Eaton shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Acuity Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Eaton has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Eaton pays an annual dividend of $2.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Acuity Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Eaton pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acuity Brands pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Eaton has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Acuity Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Eaton and Acuity Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.

Eaton currently has a consensus price target of $119.8889, suggesting a potential downside of 10.52%. Acuity Brands has a consensus price target of $102.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 18.09%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Eaton is more favorable than Acuity Brands.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Eaton and Acuity Brands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than Acuity Brands. Acuity Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Eaton and Acuity Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) and Emerson Electric (NYSE:EMR) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.2% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Emerson Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Emerson Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Acuity Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Emerson Electric pays an annual dividend of $2.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Acuity Brands pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 58.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acuity Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Emerson Electric has raised its dividend for 59 consecutive years. Emerson Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Acuity Brands and Emerson Electric, as provided by MarketBeat.

Acuity Brands currently has a consensus price target of $102.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 18.09%. Emerson Electric has a consensus price target of $82.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 5.93%. Given Emerson Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Emerson Electric is more favorable than Acuity Brands.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Acuity Brands and Emerson Electric's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Emerson Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Acuity Brands. Acuity Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerson Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acuity Brands and Emerson Electric's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Emerson Electric beats Acuity Brands on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) and Roper Technologies (NYSE:ROP) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.2% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Roper Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Roper Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roper Technologies has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Acuity Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Roper Technologies pays an annual dividend of $2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Acuity Brands pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Roper Technologies pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acuity Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Roper Technologies has raised its dividend for 29 consecutive years. Roper Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Acuity Brands and Roper Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Acuity Brands currently has a consensus price target of $102.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 18.09%. Roper Technologies has a consensus price target of $414.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 8.92%. Given Roper Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Roper Technologies is more favorable than Acuity Brands.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Acuity Brands and Roper Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Roper Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Acuity Brands. Acuity Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Roper Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acuity Brands and Roper Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Roper Technologies beats Acuity Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) and Rockwell Automation (NYSE:ROK) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.2% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.2% of Rockwell Automation shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Rockwell Automation shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Acuity Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Rockwell Automation pays an annual dividend of $4.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Acuity Brands pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Rockwell Automation pays out 55.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acuity Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Rockwell Automation has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Rockwell Automation is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Acuity Brands and Rockwell Automation, as provided by MarketBeat.

Acuity Brands currently has a consensus price target of $102.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 18.09%. Rockwell Automation has a consensus price target of $234.4667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.13%. Given Rockwell Automation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rockwell Automation is more favorable than Acuity Brands.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Acuity Brands and Rockwell Automation's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Rockwell Automation has higher revenue and earnings than Acuity Brands. Acuity Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockwell Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acuity Brands and Rockwell Automation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Rockwell Automation beats Acuity Brands on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) and AMETEK (NYSE:AME) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.2% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.7% of AMETEK shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Acuity Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of AMETEK shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AMETEK has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Acuity Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. AMETEK pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Acuity Brands pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AMETEK pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acuity Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and AMETEK has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Acuity Brands and AMETEK, as provided by MarketBeat.

Acuity Brands currently has a consensus price target of $102.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 18.09%. AMETEK has a consensus price target of $109.75, suggesting a potential downside of 10.57%. Given AMETEK's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe AMETEK is more favorable than Acuity Brands.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Acuity Brands and AMETEK's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than Acuity Brands. Acuity Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Acuity Brands and AMETEK's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

AMETEK beats Acuity Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Acuity Brands (NYSE:AYI) and Enphase Energy (NASDAQ:ENPH) are both construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Acuity Brands and Enphase Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.2% of Acuity Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Enphase Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Acuity Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Enphase Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Acuity Brands and Enphase Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Acuity Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Enphase Energy. Acuity Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enphase Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Acuity Brands and Enphase Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Acuity Brands currently has a consensus price target of $102.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 18.09%. Enphase Energy has a consensus price target of $177.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Enphase Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enphase Energy is more favorable than Acuity Brands.

Summary

Enphase Energy beats Acuity Brands on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.