Timken (TKR) Competitors

Timken has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $87.07, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. Timken has a consensus target price of $150.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.16%. Given Brunswick's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Timken.

Timken has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Timken's return on equity.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 3 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Brunswick and 14 mentions for Timken. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Brunswick's score of 0.71 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Timken has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dover had 8 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Dover and 14 mentions for Timken. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Dover's score of 0.84 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Timken's net margin of 6.60%. Dover's return on equity of 18.43% beat Timken's return on equity.

Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Dover is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Timken shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Timken. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Timken presently has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.16%. Dover has a consensus price target of $238.29, indicating a potential upside of 17.70%. Given Dover's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Dover is more favorable than Timken.

In the previous week, Timken had 3 more articles in the media than ITT. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Timken and 11 mentions for ITT. ITT's average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Timken's score of 1.07 indicating that ITT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ITT has a net margin of 10.80% compared to Timken's net margin of 6.60%. ITT's return on equity of 16.83% beat Timken's return on equity.

ITT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Timken. Timken is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. ITT pays out 27.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Timken has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Timken is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

ITT presently has a consensus price target of $234.75, indicating a potential upside of 19.90%. Timken has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.16%. Given ITT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ITT is more favorable than Timken.

ITT has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Timken had 10 more articles in the media than Kennametal. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Timken and 4 mentions for Kennametal. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Kennametal's score of 0.37 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Timken has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Kennametal's net margin of 6.41%. Timken's return on equity of 11.84% beat Kennametal's return on equity.

Kennametal pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Kennametal pays out 45.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 32.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Kennametal currently has a consensus target price of $35.79, indicating a potential upside of 1.59%. Timken has a consensus target price of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.16%. Given Timken's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Timken is more favorable than Kennametal.

Timken has higher revenue and earnings than Kennametal. Kennametal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kennametal has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Kennametal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.