Timken (TKR) Competitors

Timken has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Timken has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Timken currently has a consensus target price of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.17%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Timken's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Timken is more favorable than Brunswick.

In the previous week, Timken had 2 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Timken and 8 mentions for Brunswick. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Brunswick's score of 1.05 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the media.

89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Timken has a net margin of 5.43% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Timken's return on equity.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Timken. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dover currently has a consensus price target of $238.29, suggesting a potential upside of 14.68%. Timken has a consensus price target of $150.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.17%. Given Dover's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Dover is more favorable than Timken.

Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Dover pays out 25.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dover has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Dover had 3 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Dover and 10 mentions for Timken. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Dover's score of 0.99 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Dover has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Timken's net margin of 5.43%. Dover's return on equity of 18.32% beat Timken's return on equity.

84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ITT has a net margin of 8.90% compared to Timken's net margin of 5.43%. ITT's return on equity of 15.90% beat Timken's return on equity.

ITT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Timken. Timken is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ITT presently has a consensus price target of $241.08, indicating a potential upside of 10.39%. Timken has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.17%. Given Timken's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Timken is more favorable than ITT.

In the previous week, ITT had 5 more articles in the media than Timken. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for ITT and 10 mentions for Timken. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat ITT's score of 0.82 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ITT has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Timken has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. ITT pays out 30.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Timken has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Timken is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Timken shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Timken shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Timken presently has a consensus price target of $150.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.17%. Kennametal has a consensus price target of $34.07, suggesting a potential upside of 9.04%. Given Timken's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Timken is more favorable than Kennametal.

Timken pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kennametal pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Timken pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kennametal pays out 18.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Timken has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Kennametal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kennametal has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Timken's net margin of 5.43%. Kennametal's return on equity of 24.83% beat Timken's return on equity.

In the previous week, Timken had 3 more articles in the media than Kennametal. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Timken and 7 mentions for Kennametal. Timken's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Kennametal's score of 0.78 indicating that Timken is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kennametal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Timken. Kennametal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Timken, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.1% of Timken shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Timken shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Kennametal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Timken has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kennametal has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.