Go Pro

Cummins (CMI) Competitors

Cummins logo
$635.55 +1.35 (+0.21%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$634.90 -0.65 (-0.10%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CMI vs. PCAR, PRTS, TSLA, ALSN, and CAT

Should you buy Cummins stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cummins with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cummins include PACCAR (PCAR), CarParts.com (PRTS), Tesla (TSLA), Allison Transmission (ALSN), and Caterpillar (CAT).

How does Cummins compare to PACCAR?

Cummins (NYSE:CMI) and PACCAR (NASDAQ:PCAR) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Cummins has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PACCAR has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.9% of PACCAR shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PACCAR shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PACCAR has a net margin of 9.00% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.89%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat PACCAR's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cummins7.89% 25.25% 9.77%
PACCAR 9.00%12.73%5.69%

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than PACCAR. PACCAR is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cummins$33.67B2.60$2.84B$19.2732.98
PACCAR$28.44B2.46$2.38B$4.7627.87

In the previous week, PACCAR had 16 more articles in the media than Cummins. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for PACCAR and 23 mentions for Cummins. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat PACCAR's score of 0.97 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cummins
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PACCAR
19 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. PACCAR pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PACCAR pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cummins has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years and PACCAR has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cummins presently has a consensus price target of $740.07, indicating a potential upside of 16.45%. PACCAR has a consensus price target of $131.70, indicating a potential downside of 0.74%. Given Cummins' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Cummins is more favorable than PACCAR.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
PACCAR
0 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.21

Summary

Cummins beats PACCAR on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cummins compare to CarParts.com?

CarParts.com (NASDAQ:PRTS) and Cummins (NYSE:CMI) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than CarParts.com. CarParts.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CarParts.com$547.53M0.08-$50.44M-$6.20N/A
Cummins$33.67B2.60$2.84B$19.2732.98

Cummins has a net margin of 7.89% compared to CarParts.com's net margin of -6.97%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat CarParts.com's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CarParts.com-6.97% -61.91% -19.36%
Cummins 7.89%25.25%9.77%

CarParts.com presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.11%. Cummins has a consensus target price of $740.07, indicating a potential upside of 16.45%. Given Cummins' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cummins is more favorable than CarParts.com.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CarParts.com
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

75.3% of CarParts.com shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. 6.6% of CarParts.com shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cummins had 22 more articles in the media than CarParts.com. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cummins and 1 mentions for CarParts.com. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat CarParts.com's score of 0.00 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CarParts.com
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cummins
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CarParts.com has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cummins beats CarParts.com on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cummins compare to Tesla?

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Cummins (NYSE:CMI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Tesla has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cummins has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than Cummins. Cummins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$94.83B12.96$3.79B$1.08288.15
Cummins$33.67B2.60$2.84B$19.2732.98

Tesla presently has a consensus price target of $402.24, suggesting a potential upside of 29.26%. Cummins has a consensus price target of $740.07, suggesting a potential upside of 16.45%. Given Tesla's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tesla is more favorable than Cummins.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tesla
4 Sell rating(s)
19 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Cummins has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Tesla's net margin of 3.67%. Cummins' return on equity of 25.25% beat Tesla's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tesla3.67% 3.82% 2.27%
Cummins 7.89%25.25%9.77%

In the previous week, Tesla had 235 more articles in the media than Cummins. MarketBeat recorded 258 mentions for Tesla and 23 mentions for Cummins. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Tesla's score of 0.39 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tesla
91 Very Positive mention(s)
40 Positive mention(s)
50 Neutral mention(s)
56 Negative mention(s)
21 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cummins
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

66.2% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tesla beats Cummins on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cummins compare to Allison Transmission?

Cummins (NYSE:CMI) and Allison Transmission (NYSE:ALSN) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Cummins had 14 more articles in the media than Allison Transmission. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Cummins and 9 mentions for Allison Transmission. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Allison Transmission's score of 1.30 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cummins
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Allison Transmission
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cummins has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allison Transmission has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Cummins presently has a consensus target price of $740.07, suggesting a potential upside of 16.45%. Allison Transmission has a consensus target price of $131.17, suggesting a potential upside of 14.40%. Given Cummins' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Cummins is more favorable than Allison Transmission.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Allison Transmission
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Cummins has higher revenue and earnings than Allison Transmission. Allison Transmission is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cummins, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cummins$33.67B2.60$2.84B$19.2732.98
Allison Transmission$3.01B3.16$623M$6.4317.83

Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Allison Transmission pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allison Transmission pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cummins has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years and Allison Transmission has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Cummins is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

83.5% of Cummins shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.9% of Allison Transmission shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Allison Transmission shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allison Transmission has a net margin of 14.88% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.89%. Allison Transmission's return on equity of 37.50% beat Cummins' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cummins7.89% 25.25% 9.77%
Allison Transmission 14.88%37.50%10.74%

Summary

Cummins beats Allison Transmission on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cummins compare to Caterpillar?

Cummins (NYSE:CMI) and Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Caterpillar has higher revenue and earnings than Cummins. Cummins is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caterpillar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cummins$33.67B2.60$2.84B$19.2732.98
Caterpillar$67.59B5.56$8.88B$20.0940.60

83.5% of Cummins shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Caterpillar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cummins shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Caterpillar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Caterpillar has a net margin of 13.33% compared to Cummins' net margin of 7.89%. Caterpillar's return on equity of 48.21% beat Cummins' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cummins7.89% 25.25% 9.77%
Caterpillar 13.33%48.21%10.11%

Cummins has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caterpillar has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Caterpillar had 56 more articles in the media than Cummins. MarketBeat recorded 79 mentions for Caterpillar and 23 mentions for Cummins. Cummins' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Caterpillar's score of 0.84 indicating that Cummins is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cummins
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Caterpillar
41 Very Positive mention(s)
11 Positive mention(s)
21 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cummins presently has a consensus target price of $740.07, indicating a potential upside of 16.45%. Caterpillar has a consensus target price of $966.29, indicating a potential upside of 18.46%. Given Caterpillar's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Caterpillar is more favorable than Cummins.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cummins
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Caterpillar
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.52

Cummins pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Caterpillar pays an annual dividend of $6.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Cummins pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Caterpillar pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cummins has raised its dividend for 19 consecutive years and Caterpillar has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

Summary

Caterpillar beats Cummins on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cummins News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMI vs. The Competition

MetricCumminsMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$87.70B$11.40B$10.62B$23.69B
Dividend Yield1.26%2.19%120.66%4.22%
P/E Ratio32.9820.0727.5130.98
Price / Sales2.6063.44310.0119.22
Price / Cash19.8723.3224.0718.73
Price / Book6.544.404.724.76
Net Income$2.84B$357.12M$610.65M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.07%-0.25%-0.58%-0.34%
1 Month Performance-4.02%-2.01%-2.36%-0.53%
1 Year Performance78.60%12.44%12.50%19.19%

Cummins Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMI
Cummins
4.9142 of 5 stars
$635.55
+0.2%
$740.07
+16.4%
+78.6%$87.70B$33.67B32.9867,400
PCAR
PACCAR
3.7589 of 5 stars
$133.44
+0.9%
$124.18
-6.9%
+37.5%$69.60B$28.44B28.3925,900
PRTS
CarParts.com
0.9747 of 5 stars
$4.90
-7.2%
$6.00
+22.4%
-35.7%$42.76M$547.53MN/A1,466
TSLA
Tesla
4.6895 of 5 stars
$309.23
-1.2%
$402.24
+30.1%
+2.8%$1.24T$94.83B286.33134,785
ALSN
Allison Transmission
4.915 of 5 stars
$121.92
-0.3%
$131.17
+7.6%
+30.7%$10.15B$3.01B18.964,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CMI) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners