Sensata Technologies (ST) Competitors

99.4% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensata Technologies has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sensata Technologies and Sensata Technologies both had 5 articles in the media. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Sensata Technologies' score of 0.78 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sensata Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Sensata Technologies pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Littelfuse pays out -640.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

Sensata Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensata Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sensata Technologies has a net margin of 2.37% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -0.31%. Sensata Technologies' return on equity of 18.68% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

Sensata Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $49.10, suggesting a potential upside of 16.89%. Littelfuse has a consensus target price of $465.83, suggesting a potential upside of 14.21%. Given Sensata Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sensata Technologies is more favorable than Littelfuse.

99.4% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Microchip Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Microchip Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Microchip Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Sensata Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Microchip Technology and 5 mentions for Sensata Technologies. Microchip Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Sensata Technologies' score of 0.78 indicating that Microchip Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sensata Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Microchip Technology pays an annual dividend of $1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Sensata Technologies pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Microchip Technology pays out 271.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Microchip Technology has raised its dividend for 23 consecutive years. Microchip Technology is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sensata Technologies has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Sensata Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 16.89%. Microchip Technology has a consensus target price of $98.67, indicating a potential upside of 34.66%. Given Microchip Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Microchip Technology is more favorable than Sensata Technologies.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 9.34% compared to Sensata Technologies' net margin of 2.37%. Sensata Technologies' return on equity of 18.68% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity.

Microchip Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Sensata Technologies. Sensata Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microchip Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sensata Technologies has a net margin of 2.37% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Sensata Technologies' return on equity of 18.68% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

Sensata Technologies has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Sensata Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensata Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 4 more articles in the media than Sensata Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Brunswick and 5 mentions for Sensata Technologies. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Sensata Technologies' score of 0.78 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.4% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Sensata Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sensata Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Sensata Technologies pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sensata Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $49.10, suggesting a potential upside of 16.89%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.33%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Sensata Technologies.

Dover has higher revenue and earnings than Sensata Technologies. Dover is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensata Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Dover had 1 more articles in the media than Sensata Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Dover and 5 mentions for Sensata Technologies. Dover's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Sensata Technologies' score of 0.78 indicating that Dover is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.4% of Sensata Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Dover shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Sensata Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Dover shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dover has a net margin of 13.48% compared to Sensata Technologies' net margin of 2.37%. Sensata Technologies' return on equity of 18.68% beat Dover's return on equity.

Sensata Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $49.10, indicating a potential upside of 16.89%. Dover has a consensus price target of $238.29, indicating a potential upside of 27.07%. Given Dover's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dover is more favorable than Sensata Technologies.

Sensata Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Dover pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Sensata Technologies pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Dover pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dover has increased its dividend for 70 consecutive years.

Sensata Technologies has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dover has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.