TE Connectivity (TEL) Competitors

TE Connectivity presently has a consensus target price of $255.31, indicating a potential upside of 25.70%. Given TE Connectivity's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

TE Connectivity has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 23.56% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

TE Connectivity pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. TE Connectivity pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TE Connectivity has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

TE Connectivity has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 16 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TE Connectivity and 1 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. TE Connectivity's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.67 indicating that TE Connectivity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Entegris presently has a consensus price target of $164.22, suggesting a potential upside of 22.75%. TE Connectivity has a consensus price target of $255.31, suggesting a potential upside of 25.70%. Given TE Connectivity's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Entegris.

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Entegris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 4 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TE Connectivity and 13 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat TE Connectivity's score of 1.27 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TE Connectivity has higher revenue and earnings than Entegris. TE Connectivity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. TE Connectivity pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Entegris pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TE Connectivity pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TE Connectivity has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. TE Connectivity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Entegris has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

TE Connectivity has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Entegris' net margin of 8.18%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 23.56% beat Entegris' return on equity.

TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

TE Connectivity currently has a consensus price target of $255.31, suggesting a potential upside of 25.70%. Littelfuse has a consensus price target of $465.83, suggesting a potential upside of 15.98%. Given TE Connectivity's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Littelfuse.

TE Connectivity has a net margin of 15.54% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 23.56% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

TE Connectivity has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TE Connectivity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TE Connectivity pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. TE Connectivity pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TE Connectivity has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 7 more articles in the media than Littelfuse. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for TE Connectivity and 10 mentions for Littelfuse. TE Connectivity's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Littelfuse's score of 0.90 indicating that TE Connectivity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to TE Connectivity's net margin of 15.54%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat TE Connectivity's return on equity.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than TE Connectivity. TE Connectivity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TE Connectivity pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. TE Connectivity pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TE Connectivity has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Lam Research has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. TE Connectivity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 62 more articles in the media than TE Connectivity. MarketBeat recorded 79 mentions for Lam Research and 17 mentions for TE Connectivity. TE Connectivity's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Lam Research's score of 1.18 indicating that TE Connectivity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TE Connectivity presently has a consensus price target of $255.31, suggesting a potential upside of 25.70%. Lam Research has a consensus price target of $360.51, suggesting a potential upside of 17.52%. Given TE Connectivity's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe TE Connectivity is more favorable than Lam Research.