Amphenol (APH) Competitors

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Amphenol. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Materials has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Applied Materials had 57 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 86 mentions for Applied Materials and 29 mentions for Amphenol. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Applied Materials' score of 0.74 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Amphenol presently has a consensus target price of $176.53, suggesting a potential upside of 39.20%. Applied Materials has a consensus target price of $384.52, suggesting a potential downside of 13.58%. Given Amphenol's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a net margin of 27.78% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 17.24%. Applied Materials' return on equity of 37.52% beat Amphenol's return on equity.

97.0% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Amphenol shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Amphenol pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

97.0% of Amphenol shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Amphenol shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Amphenol had 27 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Amphenol and 2 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.44 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Amphenol pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Amphenol has a net margin of 17.24% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Amphenol's return on equity of 37.44% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Amphenol presently has a consensus target price of $176.53, suggesting a potential upside of 39.20%. Given Amphenol's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than KLA. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

97.0% of Amphenol shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Amphenol shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Amphenol had 1 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Amphenol and 28 mentions for KLA. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat KLA's score of 0.86 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. KLA pays an annual dividend of $7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Amphenol pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KLA pays out 21.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years.

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 17.24%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Amphenol's return on equity.

Amphenol presently has a consensus target price of $176.53, suggesting a potential upside of 39.20%. KLA has a consensus target price of $1,838.48, suggesting a potential downside of 2.96%. Given Amphenol's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amphenol is more favorable than KLA.

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Lam Research pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amphenol pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 37 more articles in the media than Amphenol. MarketBeat recorded 66 mentions for Lam Research and 29 mentions for Amphenol. Amphenol's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Lam Research's score of 1.20 indicating that Amphenol is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Amphenol shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Amphenol shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lam Research has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amphenol. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 17.24%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat Amphenol's return on equity.

Lam Research currently has a consensus target price of $291.75, indicating a potential downside of 2.70%. Amphenol has a consensus target price of $176.53, indicating a potential upside of 39.20%. Given Amphenol's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Lam Research.