Amphenol Competitors

Amphenol (NYSE:APH) and T-Mobile US (NASDAQ:TMUS) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Amphenol and T-Mobile US, as provided by MarketBeat.

Amphenol currently has a consensus target price of $120.70, suggesting a potential downside of 3.96%. T-Mobile US has a consensus target price of $141.7083, suggesting a potential upside of 18.12%. Given T-Mobile US's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe T-Mobile US is more favorable than Amphenol.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.8% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.5% of T-Mobile US shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Amphenol shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of T-Mobile US shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Amphenol has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Amphenol and T-Mobile US's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

T-Mobile US has higher revenue and earnings than Amphenol. T-Mobile US is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Amphenol and T-Mobile US's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

SAP (NYSE:SAP) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for SAP and Amphenol, as reported by MarketBeat.

SAP presently has a consensus price target of $131.2727, suggesting a potential upside of 6.42%. Amphenol has a consensus price target of $120.70, suggesting a potential downside of 3.96%. Given SAP's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SAP is more favorable than Amphenol.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

92.8% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of SAP shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Amphenol shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

SAP has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

SAP pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. SAP pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amphenol pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amphenol has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SAP and Amphenol's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SAP has higher revenue and earnings than Amphenol. SAP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares SAP and Amphenol's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SAP beats Amphenol on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Airbnb and Amphenol, as reported by MarketBeat.

Airbnb presently has a consensus price target of $167.3462, suggesting a potential downside of 18.90%. Amphenol has a consensus price target of $120.70, suggesting a potential downside of 3.96%. Given Amphenol's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Amphenol is more favorable than Airbnb.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

92.8% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Amphenol shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Airbnb and Amphenol's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Airbnb.

Profitability

This table compares Airbnb and Amphenol's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Amphenol beats Airbnb on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Mobile (NYSE:CHL) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for China Mobile and Amphenol, as reported by MarketBeat.

China Mobile presently has a consensus price target of $49.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.12%. Amphenol has a consensus price target of $120.70, suggesting a potential downside of 3.96%. Given China Mobile's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe China Mobile is more favorable than Amphenol.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.9% of China Mobile shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Amphenol shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

China Mobile has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

China Mobile pays an annual dividend of $1.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. China Mobile pays out 47.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amphenol pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amphenol has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Mobile and Amphenol's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Mobile has higher revenue and earnings than Amphenol. China Mobile is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares China Mobile and Amphenol's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Amphenol beats China Mobile on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and Amphenol's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Amphenol pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amphenol pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Amphenol has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Applied Materials and Amphenol, as reported by MarketBeat.

Applied Materials presently has a consensus price target of $125.7391, suggesting a potential upside of 6.39%. Amphenol has a consensus price target of $120.70, suggesting a potential downside of 3.96%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than Amphenol.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Amphenol shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Amphenol shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Applied Materials and Amphenol's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Amphenol. Applied Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amphenol, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Applied Materials beats Amphenol on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) and Amphenol (NYSE:APH) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Zoom Video Communications and Amphenol's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, meaning that its stock price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Amphenol has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Zoom Video Communications and Amphenol, as reported by MarketBeat.

Zoom Video Communications presently has a consensus price target of $431.3043, suggesting a potential upside of 15.44%. Amphenol has a consensus price target of $120.70, suggesting a potential downside of 3.96%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than Amphenol.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Amphenol shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Amphenol shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Zoom Video Communications and Amphenol's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Amphenol has higher revenue and earnings than Zoom Video Communications. Amphenol is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Zoom Video Communications beats Amphenol on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.