International Business Machines (IBM) Competitors

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to International Business Machines' net margin of 15.61%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat International Business Machines' return on equity.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 159 more articles in the media than International Business Machines. MarketBeat recorded 254 mentions for Alphabet and 95 mentions for International Business Machines. International Business Machines' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Alphabet's score of 0.82 indicating that International Business Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

International Business Machines currently has a consensus target price of $294.41, suggesting a potential upside of 30.33%. Alphabet has a consensus target price of $362.73, suggesting a potential downside of 8.28%. Given International Business Machines' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe International Business Machines is more favorable than Alphabet.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than International Business Machines. International Business Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphabet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Business Machines pays an annual dividend of $6.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. International Business Machines pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Business Machines has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Alphabet has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Business Machines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

59.0% of International Business Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.3% of Alphabet shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of International Business Machines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Alphabet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 193 more articles in the media than International Business Machines. MarketBeat recorded 288 mentions for Alphabet and 95 mentions for International Business Machines. International Business Machines' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Alphabet's score of 0.82 indicating that International Business Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to International Business Machines' net margin of 15.61%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat International Business Machines' return on equity.

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than International Business Machines. International Business Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alphabet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Business Machines presently has a consensus price target of $294.41, indicating a potential upside of 30.33%. Alphabet has a consensus price target of $406.71, indicating a potential upside of 2.11%. Given International Business Machines' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe International Business Machines is more favorable than Alphabet.

59.0% of International Business Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.0% of Alphabet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of International Business Machines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Alphabet shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Alphabet has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

International Business Machines pays an annual dividend of $6.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. International Business Machines pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alphabet pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Business Machines has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Alphabet has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Business Machines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

59.0% of International Business Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of Intel shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of International Business Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Intel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Intel had 188 more articles in the media than International Business Machines. MarketBeat recorded 283 mentions for Intel and 95 mentions for International Business Machines. International Business Machines' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Intel's score of 0.89 indicating that International Business Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

International Business Machines has higher revenue and earnings than Intel. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Business Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

International Business Machines presently has a consensus price target of $294.41, indicating a potential upside of 30.33%. Intel has a consensus price target of $75.64, indicating a potential downside of 33.07%. Given International Business Machines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe International Business Machines is more favorable than Intel.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 2.18, indicating that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 15.61% compared to Intel's net margin of -5.90%. International Business Machines' return on equity of 37.23% beat Intel's return on equity.

International Business Machines pays an annual dividend of $6.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Meta Platforms pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. International Business Machines pays out 59.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International Business Machines has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Meta Platforms has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. International Business Machines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than International Business Machines. International Business Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meta Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 160 more articles in the media than International Business Machines. MarketBeat recorded 255 mentions for Meta Platforms and 95 mentions for International Business Machines. International Business Machines' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Meta Platforms' score of 0.58 indicating that International Business Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to International Business Machines' net margin of 15.61%. International Business Machines' return on equity of 37.23% beat Meta Platforms' return on equity.

International Business Machines has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

International Business Machines presently has a consensus price target of $294.41, indicating a potential upside of 30.33%. Meta Platforms has a consensus price target of $840.31, indicating a potential upside of 37.11%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than International Business Machines.

59.0% of International Business Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of International Business Machines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Meta Platforms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.