Go Pro

Kyndryl (KD) Competitors

Kyndryl logo
$12.58 +0.27 (+2.19%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

KD vs. DOX, EPAM, DXC, FORTY, and GLOB

Should you buy Kyndryl stock or one of its competitors? Kyndryl's main competitors and comparable companies include Amdocs (DOX), EPAM Systems (EPAM), DXC Technology (DXC), Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY), and Globant (GLOB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does Kyndryl compare to Amdocs?

Amdocs (NASDAQ:DOX) and Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Amdocs currently has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 41.15%. Kyndryl has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.16%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Kyndryl.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Amdocs
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Kyndryl
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

92.0% of Amdocs shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Amdocs shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amdocs has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Amdocs' return on equity of 20.28% beat Kyndryl's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Amdocs9.75% 20.28% 10.94%
Kyndryl 0.58%12.24%1.33%

Amdocs has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 1 more articles in the media than Amdocs. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Kyndryl and 4 mentions for Amdocs. Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Amdocs' score of 0.35 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Amdocs
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kyndryl
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Amdocs has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kyndryl. Amdocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amdocs$4.53B1.46$564.70M$4.2014.62
Kyndryl$15.09B0.18$199M$0.3734.00

Summary

Amdocs beats Kyndryl on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kyndryl compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat Kyndryl's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EPAM Systems7.15% 15.84% 11.95%
Kyndryl 0.58%12.24%1.33%

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 3 more articles in the media than Kyndryl. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for EPAM Systems and 5 mentions for Kyndryl. EPAM Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.83 indicating that EPAM Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kyndryl
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

EPAM Systems presently has a consensus target price of $116.47, suggesting a potential upside of 5.41%. Kyndryl has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.16%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than EPAM Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EPAM Systems
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.35
Kyndryl
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Kyndryl shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

EPAM Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kyndryl. EPAM Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems$5.46B1.04$377.68M$7.3814.97
Kyndryl$15.09B0.18$199M$0.3734.00

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Kyndryl on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kyndryl compare to DXC Technology?

Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) and DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DXC Technology has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of DXC Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Kyndryl. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for DXC Technology and 5 mentions for Kyndryl. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.83 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kyndryl
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DXC Technology
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

DXC Technology has a net margin of 0.99% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat Kyndryl's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kyndryl0.58% 12.24% 1.33%
DXC Technology 0.99%15.60%3.94%

Kyndryl has higher revenue and earnings than DXC Technology. DXC Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kyndryl$15.09B0.18$199M$0.3734.00
DXC Technology$12.64B0.14$18M$0.7015.44

Kyndryl presently has a consensus target price of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.16%. DXC Technology has a consensus target price of $12.21, indicating a potential upside of 12.99%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than DXC Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kyndryl
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
DXC Technology
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.78

Summary

DXC Technology beats Kyndryl on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kyndryl compare to Formula Systems (1985)?

Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kyndryl0.58% 12.24% 1.33%
Formula Systems (1985) 21.58%4.01%1.94%

Formula Systems (1985) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kyndryl. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kyndryl$15.09B0.18$199M$0.3734.00
Formula Systems (1985)$2.75B0.65$606.48M$39.312.96

Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kyndryl presently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.16%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kyndryl
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 4 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Kyndryl and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.83 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kyndryl
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Formula Systems (1985)
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats Kyndryl on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kyndryl compare to Globant?

Globant (NYSE:GLOB) and Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Globant presently has a consensus price target of $46.38, suggesting a potential upside of 16.93%. Kyndryl has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.16%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Globant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Globant
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.24
Kyndryl
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Globant had 14 more articles in the media than Kyndryl. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Globant and 5 mentions for Kyndryl. Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Globant's score of 0.26 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Globant
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kyndryl
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kyndryl has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Globant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Globant$2.45B0.71$102.92M$2.5515.55
Kyndryl$15.09B0.18$199M$0.3734.00

Globant has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Globant has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat Globant's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Globant4.63% 9.28% 6.18%
Kyndryl 0.58%12.24%1.33%

91.6% of Globant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Kyndryl shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Globant shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Globant beats Kyndryl on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kyndryl News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KD vs. The Competition

MetricKyndrylIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.73B$11.08B$29.55B$24.31B
Dividend YieldN/A2.80%2.75%3.70%
P/E Ratio34.0014.2673.3530.31
Price / Sales0.1862.10598.8821.00
Price / Cash0.9242.1550.3532.49
Price / Book2.3524.959.446.77
Net Income$199M$273.31M$679.74M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.44%-1.25%-1.29%-0.65%
1 Month Performance8.11%5.45%4.03%3.38%
1 Year Performance-59.63%30.28%189.70%14.90%

Kyndryl Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KD
Kyndryl
4.1636 of 5 stars
$12.58
+2.2%
$16.50
+31.2%
-59.6%$2.73B$15.09B34.0072,000
DOX
Amdocs
4.3527 of 5 stars
$57.25
-1.7%
$86.67
+51.4%
-30.4%$6.28B$4.53B13.6326,969
EPAM
EPAM Systems
3.3175 of 5 stars
$98.80
-1.7%
$116.47
+17.9%
-36.8%$5.18B$5.46B13.3962,850
DXC
DXC Technology
4.3071 of 5 stars
$10.38
-3.8%
$12.44
+19.8%
-24.1%$1.72B$12.64B14.83115,000
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
1.8875 of 5 stars
$109.88
+0.6%
N/A-9.7%$1.67B$2.63B2.8019,337

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:KD) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners