S&P 500   3,699.12 (+0.88%)
DOW   30,218.26 (+0.83%)
QQQ   305.52 (+0.41%)
AAPL   122.25 (-0.56%)
MSFT   214.36 (+0.06%)
FB   279.70 (-0.76%)
GOOGL   1,823.76 (+0.11%)
AMZN   3,162.58 (-0.76%)
TSLA   599.04 (+0.95%)
NVDA   542.33 (+1.21%)
BABA   267.25 (+0.13%)
CGC   28.59 (-0.14%)
GE   10.88 (+2.64%)
MU   73.34 (+4.92%)
AMD   94.04 (+1.87%)
T   29.54 (+1.06%)
NIO   43.04 (-5.09%)
F   9.34 (+1.41%)
ACB   10.89 (-3.11%)
BA   232.71 (-1.89%)
NFLX   498.31 (+0.16%)
GILD   61.56 (+1.15%)
DIS   154.14 (+0.59%)
S&P 500   3,699.12 (+0.88%)
DOW   30,218.26 (+0.83%)
QQQ   305.52 (+0.41%)
AAPL   122.25 (-0.56%)
MSFT   214.36 (+0.06%)
FB   279.70 (-0.76%)
GOOGL   1,823.76 (+0.11%)
AMZN   3,162.58 (-0.76%)
TSLA   599.04 (+0.95%)
NVDA   542.33 (+1.21%)
BABA   267.25 (+0.13%)
CGC   28.59 (-0.14%)
GE   10.88 (+2.64%)
MU   73.34 (+4.92%)
AMD   94.04 (+1.87%)
T   29.54 (+1.06%)
NIO   43.04 (-5.09%)
F   9.34 (+1.41%)
ACB   10.89 (-3.11%)
BA   232.71 (-1.89%)
NFLX   498.31 (+0.16%)
GILD   61.56 (+1.15%)
DIS   154.14 (+0.59%)
S&P 500   3,699.12 (+0.88%)
DOW   30,218.26 (+0.83%)
QQQ   305.52 (+0.41%)
AAPL   122.25 (-0.56%)
MSFT   214.36 (+0.06%)
FB   279.70 (-0.76%)
GOOGL   1,823.76 (+0.11%)
AMZN   3,162.58 (-0.76%)
TSLA   599.04 (+0.95%)
NVDA   542.33 (+1.21%)
BABA   267.25 (+0.13%)
CGC   28.59 (-0.14%)
GE   10.88 (+2.64%)
MU   73.34 (+4.92%)
AMD   94.04 (+1.87%)
T   29.54 (+1.06%)
NIO   43.04 (-5.09%)
F   9.34 (+1.41%)
ACB   10.89 (-3.11%)
BA   232.71 (-1.89%)
NFLX   498.31 (+0.16%)
GILD   61.56 (+1.15%)
DIS   154.14 (+0.59%)
S&P 500   3,699.12 (+0.88%)
DOW   30,218.26 (+0.83%)
QQQ   305.52 (+0.41%)
AAPL   122.25 (-0.56%)
MSFT   214.36 (+0.06%)
FB   279.70 (-0.76%)
GOOGL   1,823.76 (+0.11%)
AMZN   3,162.58 (-0.76%)
TSLA   599.04 (+0.95%)
NVDA   542.33 (+1.21%)
BABA   267.25 (+0.13%)
CGC   28.59 (-0.14%)
GE   10.88 (+2.64%)
MU   73.34 (+4.92%)
AMD   94.04 (+1.87%)
T   29.54 (+1.06%)
NIO   43.04 (-5.09%)
F   9.34 (+1.41%)
ACB   10.89 (-3.11%)
BA   232.71 (-1.89%)
NFLX   498.31 (+0.16%)
GILD   61.56 (+1.15%)
DIS   154.14 (+0.59%)
Log in
NYSE:SNAP

Snap Competitors

$48.10
+0.15 (+0.31 %)
(As of 12/4/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$47.40
Now: $48.10
$48.60
50-Day Range
$27.83
MA: $40.77
$47.95
52-Week Range
$7.89
Now: $48.10
$48.60
Volume12.90 million shs
Average Volume30.81 million shs
Market Capitalization$71.67 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.52

Competitors

Snap (NYSE:SNAP) Vs. ZM, BIDU, PINS, TTD, TWTR, and INFO

Should you be buying SNAP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "computer programming, data processing, & other computer related" are considered alternatives and competitors to Snap, including Zoom Video Communications (ZM), Baidu (BIDU), Pinterest (PINS), The Trade Desk (TTD), Twitter (TWTR), and IHS Markit (INFO).

Snap (NYSE:SNAP) and Zoom Video Communications (NASDAQ:ZM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Snap and Zoom Video Communications, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Snap192502.69
Zoom Video Communications2111402.44

Snap presently has a consensus target price of $33.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 30.61%. Zoom Video Communications has a consensus target price of $419.7917, suggesting a potential upside of 2.39%. Given Zoom Video Communications' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Zoom Video Communications is more favorable than Snap.

Risk and Volatility

Snap has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zoom Video Communications has a beta of -1.46, indicating that its share price is 246% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Snap and Zoom Video Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Snap-57.18%-49.08%-26.52%
Zoom Video Communications17.10%27.93%14.44%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Snap and Zoom Video Communications' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap$1.72 billion41.78$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-64.13
Zoom Video Communications$622.66 million187.29$25.31 million$0.094,555.67

Zoom Video Communications has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zoom Video Communications, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

47.0% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.0% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.3% of Zoom Video Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Zoom Video Communications beats Snap on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) and Snap (NYSE:SNAP) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Baidu and Snap, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baidu041402.78
Snap192502.69

Baidu presently has a consensus price target of $158.9118, suggesting a potential upside of 10.30%. Snap has a consensus price target of $33.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 30.61%. Given Baidu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Baidu is more favorable than Snap.

Volatility & Risk

Baidu has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Snap has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Baidu and Snap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baidu22.66%10.78%6.14%
Snap-57.18%-49.08%-26.52%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Baidu and Snap's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baidu$15.43 billion3.23$296 million$5.3626.88
Snap$1.72 billion41.78$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-64.13

Baidu has higher revenue and earnings than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baidu, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.2% of Baidu shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Baidu shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Baidu beats Snap on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) and Snap (NYSE:SNAP) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

54.5% of Pinterest shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Pinterest and Snap, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pinterest091902.68
Snap192502.69

Pinterest presently has a consensus price target of $57.5556, suggesting a potential downside of 14.49%. Snap has a consensus price target of $33.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 30.61%. Given Pinterest's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Pinterest is more favorable than Snap.

Volatility & Risk

Pinterest has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Snap has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Pinterest and Snap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pinterest-32.88%-20.50%-17.42%
Snap-57.18%-49.08%-26.52%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pinterest and Snap's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinterest$1.14 billion36.41$-1,361,370,000.00($3.24)-20.77
Snap$1.72 billion41.78$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-64.13

Snap has higher revenue and earnings than Pinterest. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinterest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Snap beats Pinterest on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) and Snap (NYSE:SNAP) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares The Trade Desk and Snap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Trade Desk17.57%18.10%6.91%
Snap-57.18%-49.08%-26.52%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Trade Desk and Snap's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Trade Desk$661.06 million64.21$108.32 million$2.27398.14
Snap$1.72 billion41.78$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-64.13

The Trade Desk has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Trade Desk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

The Trade Desk has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its stock price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Snap has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.7% of The Trade Desk shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Snap shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of The Trade Desk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for The Trade Desk and Snap, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Trade Desk08702.47
Snap192502.69

The Trade Desk currently has a consensus price target of $593.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 34.37%. Snap has a consensus price target of $33.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 30.61%. Given Snap's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Snap is more favorable than The Trade Desk.

Summary

The Trade Desk beats Snap on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Snap (NYSE:SNAP) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Twitter and Snap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Twitter-32.54%-12.17%-8.11%
Snap-57.18%-49.08%-26.52%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Twitter and Snap's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twitter$3.46 billion10.97$1.47 billion$1.9923.98
Snap$1.72 billion41.78$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-64.13

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twitter, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Twitter has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Snap has a beta of 1.52, suggesting that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

71.9% of Twitter shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Snap shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Twitter shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Twitter and Snap, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Twitter4221002.17
Snap192502.69

Twitter currently has a consensus price target of $39.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 16.49%. Snap has a consensus price target of $33.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 30.61%. Given Twitter's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Twitter is more favorable than Snap.

Summary

Twitter beats Snap on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IHS Markit (NYSE:INFO) and Snap (NYSE:SNAP) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

IHS Markit has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Snap has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares IHS Markit and Snap's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IHS Markit$4.41 billion8.45$502.70 million$2.0944.80
Snap$1.72 billion41.78$-1,033,660,000.00($0.75)-64.13

IHS Markit has higher revenue and earnings than Snap. Snap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IHS Markit, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for IHS Markit and Snap, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
IHS Markit071002.59
Snap192502.69

IHS Markit presently has a consensus price target of $83.4375, suggesting a potential downside of 10.90%. Snap has a consensus price target of $33.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 30.61%. Given IHS Markit's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IHS Markit is more favorable than Snap.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.7% of IHS Markit shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.0% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of IHS Markit shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares IHS Markit and Snap's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
IHS Markit21.45%11.07%5.72%
Snap-57.18%-49.08%-26.52%

Summary

IHS Markit beats Snap on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Snap Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Zoom Video Communications logo
ZM
Zoom Video Communications
1.1$410.01+0.9%$116.62 billion$622.66 million525.65Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Baidu logo
BIDU
Baidu
2.0$144.07+0.1%$49.82 billion$15.43 billion14.49Increase in Short Interest
Pinterest logo
PINS
Pinterest
1.2$67.31+3.6%$43.08 billion$1.14 billion-94.80Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
The Trade Desk logo
TTD
The Trade Desk
1.8$903.78+1.8%$42.45 billion$661.06 million364.43Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Twitter logo
TWTR
Twitter
1.3$47.73+0.1%$37.96 billion$3.46 billion-34.84Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
IHS Markit logo
INFO
IHS Markit
2.0$93.64+3.2%$36.10 billion$4.41 billion40.89Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Yandex logo
YNDX
Yandex
1.6$68.05+1.9%$22.52 billion$2.83 billion200.15
Wix.com logo
WIX
Wix.com
1.5$255.83+0.9%$14.10 billion$761.09 million-99.16Analyst Downgrade
GDS logo
GDS
GDS
1.3$90.99+1.1%$13.68 billion$592.15 million-174.98Analyst Downgrade
FactSet Research Systems logo
FDS
FactSet Research Systems
1.5$351.01+1.3%$13.34 billion$1.49 billion36.37Insider Selling
LINE logo
LN
LINE
0.6$51.83+0.1%$12.50 billion$2.12 billion-28.48Decrease in Short Interest
Weibo logo
WB
Weibo
1.4$41.91+1.8%$9.60 billion$1.77 billion19.49Upcoming Earnings
MDLA
Medallia
1.5$30.48+15.3%$4.48 billion$402.46 million-29.03Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Heavy News Reporting
HUYA logo
HUYA
HUYA
1.5$19.00+2.1%$4.14 billion$1.20 billion38.78Increase in Short Interest
Sabre logo
SABR
Sabre
1.2$12.40+2.9%$3.93 billion$3.97 billion-5.85High Trading Volume
DOYU
DouYu International
1.4$11.98+1.6%$3.86 billion$1.04 billion33.28High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
TripAdvisor logo
TRIP
TripAdvisor
1.1$30.94+7.6%$3.85 billion$1.56 billion-39.16Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Switch logo
SWCH
Switch
1.6$16.07+0.9%$3.83 billion$462.31 million160.72
Cardlytics logo
CDLX
Cardlytics
1.1$123.19+4.4%$3.24 billion$210.43 million-73.33Analyst Downgrade
21Vianet Group logo
VNET
21Vianet Group
1.0$28.04+0.7%$3.15 billion$544.25 million-9.47
SVMK logo
SVMK
SVMK
1.6$21.06+0.8%$2.97 billion$307.42 million-33.43
Pluralsight logo
PS
Pluralsight
1.6$18.00+4.4%$2.51 billion$316.91 million-15.38
Eventbrite logo
EB
Eventbrite
1.0$18.04+4.0%$1.59 billion$326.80 million-7.16
HCAT
Health Catalyst
1.4$36.90+0.4%$1.56 billion$154.94 million-16.40Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
Model N logo
MODN
Model N
1.2$33.25+0.7%$1.15 billion$161.06 million-81.10Increase in Short Interest
QTT
Qutoutiao
1.3$2.56+5.1%$762.02 million$790.85 million-2.17Upcoming Earnings
HealthStream logo
HSTM
HealthStream
1.2$19.96+2.0%$619.94 million$254.11 million38.39Analyst Report
Heavy News Reporting
TrueCar logo
TRUE
TrueCar
1.2$4.22+4.3%$420.54 million$353.88 million-12.06Analyst Upgrade
JG
Aurora Mobile
0.5$3.25+0.9%$372.80 million$130.21 million-15.48
Sify Technologies logo
SIFY
Sify Technologies
1.2$1.11+0.0%$198.94 million$326.31 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
LIZI
Lizhi
1.5$3.82+25.4%$174.70 million$169.58 million-3.78High Trading Volume
Heavy News Reporting
Jianpu Technology logo
JT
Jianpu Technology
1.1$3.34+19.2%$57.01 million$234.18 million-1.39High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Synacor logo
SYNC
Synacor
0.9$1.36+2.2%$55.11 million$121.85 million-4.53
PT
Pintec Technology
0.6$0.97+0.7%$36.60 million$184.61 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
AutoWeb logo
AUTO
AutoWeb
1.4$2.83+2.1%$36.48 million$113.98 million-4.16Increase in Short Interest
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies
0.5$1.54+2.6%$34.35 million$58.08 million-9.06Decrease in Short Interest
GIGM
GigaMedia
0.9$2.85+0.4%$31.50 million$6.64 million-28.50Decrease in Short Interest
MOXC
Moxian
0.3$1.32+5.3%$22.51 million$370,000.000.00Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Professional Diversity Network logo
IPDN
Professional Diversity Network
0.4$1.53+4.6%$20.51 million$5.03 million0.00Analyst Downgrade
This page was last updated on 12/4/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.